2003 P Cr (PLP)
SHER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2003 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SHER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 P Cr (PLP) (SHER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Applicant's learned Advocate argued that in fact the Law Enforcing Agency permitted themselves to be used by some irresponsible and mischievous elements on the basis of misguiding and misleading information. They joined the police and Magistrate with them and trespassed into the house of applicants and arrested them without any justification and then manufactured a false story of liquor etc. for only face saving purpose. Coming on merits the learned Advocate argued that the only charge for sending the couple to the Court for trial is the alleged use and possession of liquor but after the reports of doctor and Chemical Examiner that allegation too falls to the ground and, as such, there is no possibility of conviction of the applicants/accused in this case.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 561-A
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art.4
Residence of the accused was raided basis of information that one lady was available there for commission Zina, but after raid and investigation it was proved that lady present with the accused in his house was his own wife
Only allegation left according to prosecution case was that couple was drunk and also had liquor in their possession, but in a result of medical examination none of them was found to have taken liquor
Stuff which prosecution claimed to alcohol was not found to be so
Taking of swabs of lady who happened to be wife of the accused, was absolutely unnecessary as she could never be charged for Zina with her own husband
Possibility of conviction of couple in presence of two negative reports, could safely be excluded
Proceedings challenged by accused, were liable to be quashed.
Judgment & Decree
Couple was referred to Medical Officer, Badin for examination and report not only in respect of taking liquor but also regarding the act of intercourse too. The doctor reported that none of the two persons was found to have taken liquor. The swabs of the couple together with their blood and urine taken by the hospital authorities were sent for chemical examination. Also the sample of liquid alleged to be liquor was dispatched for the chemical examination. After examining all the items/articles chemically the Chemical Examiner sent the result as under:-- Human semen is not detected in above cited articles Nos. one, two, three, four six, seven and eleven. Ethyl Alcohol is not detected in above cited articles Nos. five nine, ten, twelve and thirteen respectively. Ethyl. Alcohol is not detected in above cited article No. fourteen. Before arrival of the reports of Chemical Examiner Sher Khan and Nawabzadi were challaned for offence under Article 4, Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 on 4-12-2001. After arrival of the report, an application for acquittal of the accused/applicants under section 249-A, Cr.P.C. was filed. After its dismissal on 4-4-2002 by the trial Court the present application for quashment of the proceedings has been filed. Applicant's learned Advocate argued that in fact the Law Enforcing Agency permitted themselves to be used by some irresponsible and mischievous elements on the basis of misguiding and misleading information. They joined the police and Magistrate with them and trespassed into the house of applicants and arrested them without any justification and then manufactured a false story of liquor etc. for only face saving purpose. Coming on merits the learned Advocate argued that the only charge for sending the couple to the Court for trial is the alleged use and possession of liquor but after the reports of doctor and Chemical Examiner that allegation too falls to the ground and, as such, there is no possibility of conviction of the applicants/accused in this case. Mr. Siddiqui, the learned counsel appearing for the State concedes to these arguments. It is true that bungalow of Sher Khan the applicant was raided on the basis of an information that one lady was available there for commission of Zina but after raid and investigation it was proved that a lady available with Sher Khan in bungalow was his own wife Nawabzadi. After' that the only allegation, according to prosecution case was that the couple was drunk and also they had liquor in their possession. In the result of medical examination none of them was found to have taken the liquor. Also the stuff which the prosecution claimed to be alcohol was A found not to be Ethyl Alcohol. Taking of swabs of the lady who happened to be wife of Sher Khan was absolutely unnecessary as she could never be charged for Zina with her own husband. In presence of the two negative reports the possibility, of conviction of the couple in present case can safely be excluded. Thus there is no possibility of the conviction of the applicants in the case pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Badin. The proceedings challenged through present application are, therefore, liable to be quashed. Although his name and designation are not disclosed but I must express deep concern over the performance of an officer of the law enforcing agency having played a leading role in the episode. He arranged the entry in the house without verifying the genuineness of so ?called information about presence of one stranger lady with Sher Khan in his bungalow, The matter did not end with the entry into the house but the couple was arrested and taken to police station on a charge of taking and possessing liquor. The events like present one surely damage the image of the Agencies which are expected to conduct themselves decently and with full sense of responsibility. Required restraint is essentially to be taken care of while dealing with the matters relating to the honour. and liberty of citizens. In consequence of above the proceedings against the applicants pending before the Civil Judge and F.C.M., Badin in the result of case registered as Crime No. 193 of 2001 at Police Station Badin are quashed. H.B.T./S-279/K?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Proceedings quashed.