YLR 2016

2016 PLP 2564 (YLR)

DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION through President — Petitioner Versus SINDH BAR COUNCIL through Secretary and 3 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
Decided Date
C.P. No.D-620 of 2015, decided on 21st April, 2015.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Shaukat Ali Memon, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2016 PLP 2564 (YLR)
Forum / Court Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
Bench Members Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Shaukat Ali Memon, JJ
Parties DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION through President — Petitioner Versus SINDH BAR COUNCIL through Secretary and 3 others — Respondents
Primary Law Bar Association
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2016 PLP 2564 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Bar Association as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2016 PLP 2564 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh (Hyderabad Bench) bench comprising: Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Shaukat Ali Memon, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2016 PLP 2564 (YLR) (DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION through President — Petitioner Versus SINDH BAR COUNCIL through Secretary and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Bar Association

Representation

  • M. Yousif Leghari for Petitioner along with Petitioner in person
  • Mr. M. Yousif Leghari advocate has filed the amended title in compliance of the order dated 16.4.2015 which is taken on record.
  • Mr. Salahuddin Gandapur has filed Vakalatnama for respondent No.1 and also appearing in person as respondent No.4.
  • Mr. Mustafa Lakhani present along with Mr. Pir Darvesh advocate has filed Vakalatnama for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
  • Counsel for respondent No.1 has also filed a statement along with various documents. On the contrary counsel for the petitioner has also filed a list of members and argued that some of the members/ voters are government servants, some of them have dual membership and some members are in private service hence they cannot be treated actively practicing advocates, copy of the list is taken on record and supplied to the respondents.
  • At the very outset learned counsel for respondents pointed out page 43 which is the memo of appeal filed by District Bar Association Mirpurkhas through its General Secretary. This appeal was disposed of vide short order dated 7.2.2015 by the Appellate Committee (Sindh) Pakistan Bar Council in which the parties were agreed that Mr. Salahuddin Gandapur may be appointed Chairman Election Board for holding fresh elections of District Bar Association Mirpurkhas along with two other members of the bar. Till such time Mr. Muhammad Muzzafar Leghari advocate, Supreme Court shall continue to look after day to day affairs of the District Bar Association, Mirpurkhas. The reasons were given by the Appellate Committee (Sindh) Pakistan Bar Council on 24.3.2015 which are available at page 59 in which the elections board was directed to hold the elections of District Bar Association Mirpurkhas in the year 2015 within a period of one month.
  • Learned counsel for respondents argued that this was a consent order in which Mr. Muhammad Muzzafar Leghari advocate was also present hence at this stage he has no right to assail or challenge this order and the petition is not maintainable.
  • After arguing at some length Mr. Muhammad Yousif Leghari advocate submits that he has no objection if the elections are held but he submits that the list of members submitted by him should be scrutinized so that the government officials or the members who are in service or the members having dual membership may be excluded from the list of voters of Mirpurkhas Bar Association. He further submits that since the elections are going to be held on 25.4.2015, therefore, due to paucity of time this exercise cannot be carried out properly within short period of time. Mr. Mustafa Lakhani and Mr. Salahuddin Gandapur agreed that they will consider the list submitted by Mr. Muhammad Yousif Leghari and also scrutinize the same and if any person is found in having dual membership or in government service or in private service, his name will be excluded in accordance with the Bar Council Rules after giving them opportunity of hearing. They also agreed that since this exercise will take some time, therefore, they agreed that the elections on 25.4.2015 will be postponed and now the Mirpurkhas Bar Association Election for 2015 will be held on 16.5.2015, however the nomination of the candidature will remain intact including the schedule and no modification will be made in the elections schedule except the new date of elections i.e. 16.5.2015.

Headnotes / Summary

Election of Bar Association

Voters list, scrutiny of

Delay in elections

Grievance of petitioner was that list of members of concerned Bar Association was to be scrutinized so that government officials or members who were in service or the members having dual membership should be excluded from the list of voters of the Bar Association

Petitioner had a further grievance that elections were going to be held soon and due to paucity of time scrutiny of voters list could not be carried out properly within short period of time

Effect

Election Board agreed that they would consider the list submitted by petitioner and also scrutinize the same and if any person was found having dual membership or in government service or in private service, his name would be excluded in accordance with Bar Council Rules after giving them opportunity of hearing

Election Board also agreed that as the scrutiny would take some time, therefore, they will postpone the elections for three weeks and nomination of candidature would remain intact including schedule and no modification was made in election schedule except new date of elections

Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

Mr. M. Yousif Leghari advocate has filed the amended title in compliance of the order dated 16.4.2015 which is taken on record. Mr. Salahuddin Gandapur has filed Vakalatnama for respondent No.1 and also appearing in person as respondent No.4. Mr. Mustafa Lakhani present along with Mr. Pir Darvesh advocate has filed Vakalatnama for respondent Nos. 2 and

3. Counsel for respondent No.1 has also filed a statement along with various documents. On the contrary counsel for the petitioner has also filed a list of members and argued that some of the members/ voters are government servants, some of them have dual membership and some members are in private service hence they cannot be treated actively practicing advocates, copy of the list is taken on record and supplied to the respondents. At the very outset learned counsel for respondents pointed out page 43 which is the memo of appeal filed by District Bar Association Mirpurkhas through its General Secretary. This appeal was disposed of vide short order dated 7.2.2015 by the Appellate Committee (Sindh) Pakistan Bar Council in which the parties were agreed that Mr. Salahuddin Gandapur may be appointed Chairman Election Board for holding fresh elections of District Bar Association Mirpurkhas along with two other members of the bar. Till such time Mr. Muhammad Muzzafar Leghari advocate, Supreme Court shall continue to look after day to day affairs of the District Bar Association, Mirpurkhas. The reasons were given by the Appellate Committee (Sindh) Pakistan Bar Council on 24.3.2015 which are available at page 59 in which the elections board was directed to hold the elections of District Bar Association Mirpurkhas in the year 2015 within a period of one month. Learned counsel for respondents argued that this was a consent order in which Mr. Muhammad Muzzafar Leghari advocate was also present hence at this stage he has no right to assail or challenge this order and the petition is not maintainable. After arguing at some length Mr. Muhammad Yousif Leghari advocate submits that he has no objection if the elections are held but he submits that the list of members submitted by him should be scrutinized so that the government officials or the members who are in service or the members having dual membership may be excluded from the list of voters of Mirpurkhas Bar Association. He further submits that since the elections are going to be held on 25.4.2015, therefore, due to paucity of time this exercise cannot be carried out properly within short period of time. Mr. Mustafa Lakhani and Mr. Salahuddin Gandapur agreed that they will consider the list submitted by Mr. Muhammad Yousif Leghari and also scrutinize the same and if any person is found in having dual membership or in government service or in private service, his name will be excluded in accordance with the Bar Council Rules after giving them opportunity of hearing. They also agreed that since this exercise will take some time, therefore, they agreed that the elections on 25.4.2015 will be postponed and now the Mirpurkhas Bar Association Election for 2015 will be held on 16.5.2015, however the nomination of the candidature will remain intact including the schedule and no modification will be made in the elections schedule except the new date of elections i.e. 16.5.2015. By consent the petition is disposed of in the above terms. MH/D-17/Sindh Order accordingly.