SCMR 1987

1987 PLP 272 (SCMR)

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 381 of 1986, decided on 23rd December, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal, and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 272 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal, and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 272 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 272 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal, and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 272 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Khalid Farooq Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 23rd December, 1986.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court Lahore, dated 3rd December, 1986 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 608/M of 1986). ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 176(2) & 439‑‑Exhumation of dead body‑‑Lapse of one year‑‑High Court in revision setting aside order of Sessions Court and directing exhumation of dead body to ascertain cause of death‑‑Order impugned‑‑Pleas that on numerous inquest /inquiries cause of death was stated to be natural and that after lapse of one year no useful purpose would be served by disinterment, repelled‑‑Petitioner at initial stage had stated that he had no objection if dead body was exhumed and that disinterment could take place even after one year to ascertain cause of death‑‑Impugned order, held, not open to interference‑‑Leave to appeal refused. Modi on Medical Jurisprudence ref.

Judgment & Decree

Modi on Medical Jurisprudence ref. Khalid Farooq Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 23rd December, 1986. JAVID IQBAL, J.‑‑This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court Lahore, dated 3rd December, 1986. Facts are that Mst. Lalo Bibi had died in suspicious circumstances. Therefore, her brother moved an application to the authorities for exhumation of her dead body. The District Magistrate sent that application to the Police who after an inquest reported that the death of Mst. Lalo Bibi was natural. Dissatisfied with the findings of the Police another application was moved for disinterment of the dead body. This time the District Magistrate forwarded the application for necessary action to the Assistant Commissioner who held an inquiry and examined some witnesses. He arrived at the conclusion that the circumstances of the death of Mst. Lalo Bibi were suspicious and that, therefore, he recommended the exhumation of the dead body. The inquiry report of the Assistant Commissioner was placed before the District Magistrate who disagreeing with the finding of the Assistant Commissioner disallowed the prayer for exhumation Aggrieved by the said order a revision petition was filed before the Additional Sessions Judge who remanded the case to the District Magistrate to reconsider the finding of the Assistant Commissioner. The District Magistrate then held an inquiry and after examining witnesses from both the sides arrived at the conclusion that the death of Mst. Lalo Bibi was natural. Consequently another revision petition was moved before the Sessions Court which was dismissed. Thereafter, the matter was taken to the High Court and the learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court Lahore set aside the order of the Sessions Court and directed the District Magistrate Bhakkar to exhumate the dead body of Mst. Lalo Bibi in the presence of a board of doctors to be constituted at the District Headquarters Hospital to ascertain the cause of death of Mst. Lalo Bibi. Before us learned counsel for the petitioner argued that when on numerous occasions inquest/inquiries had been held in this case arriving at the conclusion that the cause of death of Mst. Lalo Bibi was natural, her dead body should not be exhumed. It was submitted that furtherance one year had passed and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in the disinterment. We have heard the learned counsel. At the initial stage the husband of Mst. Lalo Bibi, i.e. the present petitioner had himself stated while being examined that he had no objection if the dead body of Mst. Lalo Bibi was exhumed Besides that learned Single Judge while relying on a passage from the book of Modi on Medical Jurisprudence: had held that disinterment could take place even after one year to, ascertain the cause of death. We have gone through the impugned judgment and in the light of what has been discussed above no interference are called for. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. M. I. Petition dismissed.