CLC 2008

2008 PLP 896 (CLC)

MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Petitioner Versus AYUB NAWAZ, TAXATION OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE,

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2006-June-26
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2008 PLP 896 (CLC)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Petitioner Versus AYUB NAWAZ, TAXATION OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE,
Primary Law Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 896 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 896 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 896 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Petitioner Versus AYUB NAWAZ, TAXATION OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979)

Representation

  • Muhammad Arshad Mughal for Petitioner.
  • Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Mohandra for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 73, 137 & Second Sched.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199

Constitutional petition

Levy of tax on dangerous and offensive trade

Authority of Local Council

Scope

Petitioner had challenged notice issued by Authority calling upon him to pay amount as a tax on dangerous and offensive trade

Contention of petitioner was that under S.137 of Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979, Local Council was empowered to levy tax enumerated in the Second Schedule of the Ordinance; that according to Part III of Second Schedule, the leviable taxes of Urban Local Council were detailed in the said part of the Schedule and disputed dangerous and offensive trade tax was not listed therein; that Local Council had no authority to claim any such tax

Urban Local Council, according to Part III of Second Schedule of Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979 was competent to levy taxes mentioned in said part and claim No.16 of said part did not relate exclusively to dangerous and offensive trade; it was general item relating to all general items, trades etc.

Under S.73 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979 Local Council could regulate the dangerous and offensive articles and trades by means of issuance of licence putting restrictions on their movement, keeping, quantity, quality control etc., but certainly no tax was provided for such a dangerous or offensive trade

Tax being a compulsory levy, had to be construed very strictly

Merely by implication or commonality of certain words a citizen could not be burdened with tax

Impugned notice was declared illegal and without lawful authority, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD KHALID ALVI, J.

With the concurrence of learned counsel for the parties this case is being treated as a Pacca Case.

2. Through this constitutional petition petitioner has challenged a notice issued by respondent No.1 calling upon the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.4,100 as a tax on dangerous and offensive trade. The petitioner allegedly runs the business of manufacturing of trunks and boxes etc.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that under section 137 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979 a Local Council is empowered to levy tax enumerated in the Second Schedule of Ordinance. According to Part III of the Second Schedule the leviable taxes of the Urban Local Council are detailed in the said part of the schedule. The disputed tax i.e. dangerous and offensive trade tax is not listed, therefore, respondent Local Council has no authority to claim any such tax.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent with reference to section 73 of the Ordinance contends that the Local councils have the jurisdiction to regulate the business of dangerous and offensive trade. Further submits that dangerous and offensive articles and trades are detailed in the First Schedule of the Ordinance and at Item No.21 the trade of the petitioner is detailed as "manufacturer of safes, trunks and boxes", therefore, the business of the petitioner is within the mischief of dangerous and offensive trade, thus, he is liable to pay the requisite tax. Further submits that according to Second Schedule, Part III, Item No.16 is the relevant item which covers the impugned tax.

5. I have considered the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties.

6. There is no denying the fact that a Local Council had the authority to levy tax enumerated in the Second Schedule. Respondent undeniably is Urban Local Council, therefore, according to part III is competent to levy taxes mentioned in the said Part. Item No.16 referred by the learned counsel for the respondent is "tax on professions, trades, callings and employment". This item does not relate exclusively with respect to dangerous or offensive trade. It is general item relating to all general items, trades etc.

7. Under section 73 of the Ordinance, the Local Councils can regulate the dangerous and offensive articles and trades by means of issuance of licence putting restrictions on its movement, keeping, quantity, quality etc. but certainly no tax is provided for such a dangerous or offensive trade.

8. Tax being a compulsory levy has to be construed very strictly, merely by implication or commonality by certain words a citizen cannot be burdened with tax.

9. For what has been stated above, this writ petition is allowed, resultantly, the impugned notice issued by respondent No.1 is declared to be illegal and without lawful authority. No order as to costs. H.B.T./M-55/L Petition allowed.