1989 PLP 1097 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD BADAR UL MUNIR‑‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION COUNCIL and 2 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1097 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zillah, livid Iqbal and Usman Ali Shah, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD BADAR UL MUNIR‑‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION COUNCIL and 2 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1097 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1097 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zillah, livid Iqbal and Usman Ali Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1097 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD BADAR UL MUNIR‑‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, ARBITRATION COUNCIL and 2 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem, Advocate instructed by Muhammad Aslam Chaudhary, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Amir Alam, Advocate instructed by M. A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.3.
- Date of hearing: 8th March, 1989.
- Advocate Supreme Court, Advocate Supreme Court,
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order, dated 7th November, 1988 of the Lahore High Court, in Writ Petition No.4160 of 1988). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OXXXIII, R.6‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OXXIII, R.3‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Supreme Court, after some arguments, orally announced order for dismissal of the petition‑‑Later, both counsel sought time for negotiations and settlement out of Court which was allowed by Supreme Court‑‑Counsel presented a memorandum of agreement in the form of an application under OXXXIII, R.6, Supreme Court Rules and OXXIII, R.3, C.P.C. for acceptance thereof and disposal of the petition accordingly‑‑Both counsel stated before Supreme Court that agreement was genuine and without coercion and there was no other impediment in its implementation‑‑Supreme Court, converted petition into appeal and disposed of same in terms of agreement. Nemo for other Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑After some arguments when we orally announced the order for dismissal of this petition, both the learned counsel sought time for negotiations and settlement out of Court. Time having been allowed to them, they have presented a memorandum of agreement in the form of an application under Order XXXIII, Rule 6, Supreme Court Rules and under Order XXIII, Rule 3 of the C.P.C. for acceptance thereof and disposal of the petition accordingly. It reads as follows:‑‑ l. That the abovestated Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal is pending in this learned Court and the same is fixed for 8‑3‑1989.
2. That through the intervention of some respectable and counsel for the parties, the parties have reached at a compromise to the following effect:‑‑ (a) That the petitioner has agreed to surrender the custody of minor Waqas Badar in favour of respondent No.3. Mst. Tallat Shaheen, and in consideration thereof Mst. Tallat Shaheen has agreed to forego her claim for maintenance i.e. past as well as future and the decree passed against the petitioner and in favour of Mst. Tallat Shaheen by Chairman, Arbitration Council and modified by the High Court may be set aside. (b) That the petitioner shall pay tomorrow a sum of Rs.10,000 i.e.1/2 of the dower amount to the respondent No.3, while the respondent No.3 foregoes her claim regarding the balance 1/2 thereof. (c) That the dowry of the respondent No.3 shall be returned by the to petitioner either today or tomorrow positively and the petitioner will obtain a receipt from the respondent No.3 stating that she had received the full dowry in final settlement of her claim. (d) That the petitioner shall divorce respondent No.3 by way of "Talaq‑e‑Mubarat" i.e. Irrevocable Divorce which shall be executed by both the parties, with the mutual consent. (e) That the respondent No.3 shall file an application before the learned Guardian Judge, praying she be appointed as a Guardian of the minor. The said application shall be disposed of alongwith the application already filed by the petitioner, wherein the petitioner shall, make a statement, withdrawing his application surrendering the custody of the minor in favour of respondent No.3 for all times to come and conceding the application so filed by respondent No.3. The criminal proceedings pending in the Court of Illaqa Magistrate, Bahawalnagar, and other, if any, between the parties shall be got withdrawn and compounded by the parties. The quashment proceedings filed by Shakeel Anjum Qureshi, real brother of the respondent No.3 in regards to the criminal proceedings shall be got accepted before the learned Lahore High Court (Baliawalnagar Bench), Bahawalnagar. (f) That the respondent No.3 will never claim any maintenance for the minor Waqas Badar for the past and future period, on the basis of said settlement. (g) That the parties shall cooperate with each other so as to fulfill this compromise in letter and spirit, as the same is in the interest of parties and not against public policy. It is, therefore, very humbly and respectfully prayed that the compromise noted above may very kindly and graciously be attested and Civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal may kindly be disposed of in terms thereof. Sd/x.x.x.x. Sd/x.x.x.x.x. Mst. Tallat Shaheen, Muhammad Badar‑ul‑Munir, Respondent No.3 Petitioner Sd/x.x.x.x. Sd/x.x.x.x.x. (Amir Alam Khan) (Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem) Advocate Supreme Court, Advocate Supreme Court, of Pakistan Sd/x.x.x.x. Sd/x.x.x.x. (Mahmood A.Qureshi) (Muhammad Aslam Chaudhary) A.O.R. A.O.R." Both the learned counsel stated that the agreement is genuine and further that it being without coercion there is no other impediment in its I implementation. This petition accordingly is converted into appeal. The same is disposed of in terms of agreement. There shall be no order as to costs. M.BA./M‑801/S Order accordingly.