SCMR 2020

2020 PLP 715 (SCMR)

ASFAND YAR KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Criminal Petition No. 234 of 2020, decided on 2nd April, 2020.
Honorable Judges
Umar Ata Bandial and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2020 PLP 715 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Umar Ata Bandial and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ
Parties ASFAND YAR KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2020 PLP 715 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2020 PLP 715 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Umar Ata Bandial and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2020 PLP 715 (SCMR) (ASFAND YAR KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Basharatullah Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
  • Arshad Yousafzai, Advocate Supreme Court with Durran Shah, Inspector for the State.

Headnotes / Summary

(Against order dated 3.2.2020 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Crl. Misc. No. 3759-P of 2019)

S. 497(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302(b)

Qatl-i-amd

Bail, grant of

Further inquiry

Implication through supplementary statement

Petitioners were not named in the crime report as being alongside the five main accused who gunned down the deceased

All the witnesses were unanimous on the number of accused as five

Such omission by the witnesses in not naming the petitioners at the time of lodging the FIR by itself brought petitioners' case within the remit of S. 497(2), Cr.P.C.

Petitioners were granted bail. Arshad Yousafzai, Advocate Supreme Court with Durran Shah, Inspector for the State.

Judgment & Decree

QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.

Asfand Yar Khan and Salman Khan, real brothers inter se, seek admission to bail; they have been arrayed as accused through supplementary statement dated 4.9.2019, in a case of homicide, registered on 17.8.2019 at Police Station Paharipura Peshawar on the statement of Nadim Safdar, acclaimed witness of the incident; he had blamed Asad, Farhan, Imran, Amjad and Aamir as the culprits for committing murder of his sister Sumera Safdar and driver Inaam Lag, who drove the entourage to attend proceedings in a case of murderous assault in District Courts Peshawar. Motive for the crime is bad blood over property with a string of cases raging between the parties. Sumera Safdar's daughter through supplementary statement joined the petitioners with the co-accused, initially omitted by the complainant as well as the witnesses who claimed to have survived the assault.

2. Heard. Record perused.

3. Be that as it may, the petitioners were not named in the crime report as being alongside the accused who gunned down the deceased; all the witnesses are unanimous on the number of accused as five; the omission is intriguing and by itself brings petitioners' case within the remit of subsection (2) of section 497 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898. Criminal Petition is converted into appeal and same is allowed; the petitioners shall be released upon furnishing bonds in the sum of Rs.500,000/- with one surety each in the like to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court/Duty Judge. MWA/A-14/SC Bail granted.