2012 PLP 1270 (YLR)
ABDUL REHMAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2012 PLP 1270 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Anwaarul Haq, J |
| Parties | ABDUL REHMAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 1270 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 1270 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Anwaarul Haq, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 1270 (YLR) (ABDUL REHMAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Ahsan Nizami for Petitioner.
- Rana Imtiaz Hussain Advocate for the Complainant.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 148 & 149
Qatl-e-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapons
Accused was nominated in the F.I.R. but there was no evidence connecting him with the alleged crime
Dead body of the deceased was found lying in the house of the co-accused and nothing regarding involvement of the accused was mentioned
Accused remained in physical custody of the police for fourteen days but nothing was recovered from him
Contention of complainant regarding previous enmity between the parties was a double edged weapon, which could be the reason for the murder of the deceased and at the same time could also be the cause for false implication of the accused in the case
Case against accused fell within the purview of S. 497(2), Cr.P.C and was one of further inquiry
Bail application of accused was accepted and he was released on bail.
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 148 & 149
Qatl-e-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapons
Motive for implication of accused
Scope
Motive in the shape of previous enmity was a double edged weapon, if, prima facie, it could be the reason for the murder of the deceased, it could also be the cause for false implication of the accused in the case. Ch. Muhammad Akram Tahir, DDPP for the State with Intezar Hussain A.S.-I. Rana Imtiaz Hussain Advocate for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD ANWAARUL HAQ, J.
Petitioner Abdul Rehman seeks post arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.165 dated 22-6-2011 under sections 302 and 148/149 P.P.C. registered at Police Station Sarai Mughal District Kasur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the F.I.R. does not disclose any evidence to connect the petitioner with the crime in any manner whatsoever; that the petitioner has falsely been involved in this case only on the basis of suspicion of the complainant that cannot be considered as legal evidence. Further contends that the petitioner remained on physical remand for fourteen days but nothing was recovered from him; that the deceased was involved in many murder cases and he might have been murdered by one of his other enemies.
3. On the other hand learned Deputy District Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant while opposing this bail application contends that the petitioner is nominated in the F.I.R. with the specific role that the petitioner along with his co-accused committed murder of the deceased with their respective weapons; that the complainant while appearing before the learned trial court has categorically stated that she herself has seen the occurrence and she is the eye-witness of the same; that in the statement of the complainant before the learned trial court there is direct allegation against the petitioner. Further contends that the version of the complainant is fully corroborated by the medical evidence available on the record; that there is a strong motive in the shape of previous criminal litigation between the parties; that the case against the petitioner is at evidence stage, therefore, bail should not be granted to the petitioner to avoid any possible prejudice to either side. Reliance is placed upon 2006 SCMR 1265.
4. Heard. Record perused.
5. Although the petitioner is nominated in the F.I.R. yet there is no evidence at all connecting him with the alleged crime. According to the F.I.R. itself the dead body of the deceased was found lying in the house of co-accused Ameer Hamza alias Khari but nothing is mentioned that how the petitioner is involved in this occurrence. The petitioner also remained in physical custody of the police for fourteen days but nothing was recovered from him. The motive in the shape of previous enmity is a double edged weapon, if prima facie, it can be the reason for the murder of the deceased it can also be the cause for false implication of the petitioner in this case. In view of the above, case against the petitioner, prima facie, falls within the purview of sub-section (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. and is one of further inquiry into his guilt. I, therefore, admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.2,00,000 (Rupees two hundred thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.
6. It is, however, clarified that the observations given herein are just tentative in nature and strictly confined to the disposal of this bail petition. M.W.A./A-47/L Bail granted.