PLC(CS) 1980

1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

Miss SHAUKAT MAHMOOD Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Punjab
Decided Date
Appeal No. 209,1347 of 1978, decided on 6th January, 1980.
Honorable Judges
M. Saleem Chaudhry, Chairman, Mazhar Munir and S. Hafeez‑ur‑Rehman, Members
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Punjab
Bench Members M. Saleem Chaudhry, Chairman, Mazhar Munir and S. Hafeez‑ur‑Rehman, Members
Parties Miss SHAUKAT MAHMOOD Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Primary Law Civil service‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil service‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: M. Saleem Chaudhry, Chairman, Mazhar Munir and S. Hafeez‑ur‑Rehman, Members.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Miss SHAUKAT MAHMOOD Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil service‑

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑ Termination of service without show cause and defence opportunity‑ Violative of principle of natural justice‑‑Service of Teacher of Private School on nationalisation nationalised‑Service terminated subsequently on grounds that she lead resigned prior to nationalisation‑Alleged resignation denied and contention that appellant was merely on leave without pay‑‑‑Appellant in circum stances, held, must be given opportunity to rebut evidence relating to alleged resignationTermination order set aside‑‑Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4.

Judgment & Decree

Appeal No. 209,1347 of 1978, decided on 6th January, 1980. ‑‑ Termination of service without show cause and defence opportunity‑ Violative of principle of natural justice‑‑Service of Teacher of Private School on nationalisation nationalised‑Service terminated subsequently on grounds that she lead resigned prior to nationalisation‑Alleged resignation denied and contention that appellant was merely on leave without pay‑‑‑Appellant in circum stances, held, must be given opportunity to rebut evidence relating to alleged resignationTermination order set aside‑‑Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S.

4. M. SALEEM CHAUDHRY (CHAIRMAN).‑Miss Shaukat Mahmood was employed by the Manager of the Government Kashmir primary Girls, School, Shalimar Town Lahore, on 8th April, 1971 as an untrained teacher on a monthly salary of Rs.

100. She applied and was selected for training for the Primary Teaching Course for which the Management of the School granted her leave without pay from 1st October, 1971 till the expiry of the course. On expiry of the course she reported for duty on 1st November, 1972. She was advised by the Headmistress to approach the District Inspectress of Schools, Lahore. The appellant was allowed to resume duty in. the School in pursuance of order No. 1150 dated 5th May, 1973. The appellant resumed duty on 7th May, 1973. This order seas passed on Government orders conveyed to the Director of Education vide letter No. S. O. (NS) 6‑15/73 dated. 4th May, 1973 nationalizing the services of the appellant. The appellant served until the impugned order dated 29th September, 1977 received by her on 8th October, 1977 terminating her services. She filed a representation with the Government.

2. The appellant has now submitted this appeal that since her services have been nationalized they could not be dispensed with and the order of 29th September, 1977 is, therefore, bad in law and be set aside.

3. We leave seen the record. The case of the appellant was examined by a Committee constituted which came to the opinion that Miss Shaukat Mahmood resigned from the service of the Management prior to nationalization in order to seek admission to the P. T. C. training class. It is alleged that later on the appellant, in connivance with the Ex Manager, tampered with the record so as to show herself on leave w.e.f. the date she actually resigned and then could get her services nationalized. Even if this be the correct position a mere order of termination of service of the appellant being violative of principles of natural Justice, will not be a valid order. Proper procedure had to be, followed. The appellant has to be given an opportunity to rebut the evidence against her in order to come to a decision whether the appellant was on leave or she had actually resigned from service. For this reason the procedure adopted has no legal effect. The appeal is, therefore, accepted and the order of termination is set aside. Appeal accepted.