2005 PLP 1293 (SCMR)
MAVRA ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus Sheikh EHSAN GHANI — Respondent
| Citation | 2005 PLP 1293 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Tanvir Ahmed Khan and Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, JJ |
| Parties | MAVRA ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus Sheikh EHSAN GHANI — Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 1293 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 1293 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Tanvir Ahmed Khan and Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 1293 (SCMR) (MAVRA ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus Sheikh EHSAN GHANI — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Naseer Ahmad Bhutta, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 25th February, 2003.
Headnotes / Summary
(Petition for taking action for violating commitment made by the respondent in C.P.L.A. No.965-L of 2002).
S. 5, Sched. & S.13
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.185(3) & 204
Suit for past and future maintenance by minor daughter against her father and paternal-grandfather
Courts below concurrently decreed the suit
Supreme Court disposed of appeal by father and grandfather on their statements undertaking to pay Rs.1,00,000 to minor on or before 15-5-2002 and Rs.25,000 on 10th of each month towards satisfaction of arrears and future maintenance
Minor on non-payment of Rs.25,000 to her on 10-6-2002 filed contempt application seeking compliance of such undertaking by the judgment-debtors (father and grandfather)
Judgment-debtors appeared before Supreme Court, but did not pay any amount to the minor
Supreme Court directed Executing Court to proceed to execute decree and ensure recovery of arrears of maintenance from the judgment-debtors within six months. Petitioner in person through her mother Mst. Shazia Naz.
Judgment & Decree
KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.
Through a judgment, dated 7-9-2001 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Lahore, the suit of one Mavra Arshad for her maintenance was decreed whereby she was allowed maintenance of Rs.10,000 per month and whereby the past maintenance from the date of institution of the said suit was also granted to her. An appeal filed against this judgment and decree was dismissed by a learned Additional District Judge at Lahore through his judgment, dated 16-2-2002. The father and the paternal-grandfather of Mst. Mavra Arshad then impugned these judgments before the Lahore High Court through Writ Petition No.3907 of 2002 which petition was dismissed through a judgment dated 11-3-2002 of the Honourable Lahore High Court. The said defendants i.e. the father and the paternal-grandfather of Mst. Mavra Arshad minor then approached this Court through C.P.L.A. No.965-L of 2002 questioning the above-mentioned three judgments directing payment of future and past maintenance to the said minor as mentioned above. This petition was converted into an appeal and was disposed of through a judgment dated 26-4-2002 on the basis of a statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants, committing themselves to pay Rs.1,00,000 to the minor respondent on or before 15-5-2002 and whereby they had also undertaken to pay Rs.25,000 on the 10th day of each month to the said minor towards satisfaction of the arrears and the future maintenance.
2. On 29-6-2002 the said minor submitted this petition bearing Criminal Original No.16-L of 2002 stating therein that whereas the judgment-debtors had paid Rs.1,00,000 to her as per the above-noticed commitment, the amount of Rs.25,000 which were to be paid by them before 10th of June, 2002 had not been so paid. She had consequently prayed that the said judgment-debtors be directed to comply with the undertaking given by them to this Court.
3. The respondent appeared before us and despite our efforts, the respondent-judgment-debtors did not pay any amount of money to the petitioners-decree-holder.
4. In the circumstances, we are left with no alternative but to direct the learned Court executing the above-mentioned decree passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Lahore on 7-9-2001 to proceed to execute the said decree and the said learned Executing Court shall ensure that the arrears of maintenance are recovered from the respondent judgment-debtors within six months, at the latest, with intimation to the Registrar of this Court for the information of this Bench.
5. A copy of this order shall be sent to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Lahore for onward transmission to the learned Executing Court. This petition is disposed of in the above terms. S.A.K./M-817/S Order accordingly.