1999 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Mst: ZARINA KAUSAR Versus DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (W) SAHIWAL
| Citation | 1999 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Syed Jamshed Ali, J |
| Parties | Mst: ZARINA KAUSAR Versus DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (W) SAHIWAL |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Syed Jamshed Ali, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Mst: ZARINA KAUSAR Versus DEPUTY DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (W) SAHIWAL). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Tariq Muhammad Iqbal for Petitioner.
- 2. Learned Additional Advocate‑General submits that‑‑
- This satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed in view of the undertaking given by the learned Additional Advocate‑General.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑‑Civil service‑‑‑Authority had given undertaking that no action would be taken against petitioners/civil servants on basis of report of Pakistan Army which was being considered as a survey report; that no ex pane action would be taken against any of petitioners/civil servants that in case in which any incriminating evidence was available against any civil servant, action would be taken after fulfilling necessary formalities as required by law including show‑cause notice and personal hearing and that till the time petitioners/civil servants continued in service and action against them was not finalized; salary due to them would not be stopped‑‑‑Petitioners/civil servants having satisfied themselves with undertaking given by Authority, Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. Khadim Nadim Malik, Addl. A.‑G. (on Court's call).
Judgment & Decree
Tariq Muhammad Iqbal for Petitioner. Khadim Nadim Malik, Addl. A.‑G. (on Court's call). A number of identical writ petitions raising the same question have been disposed of by the Division Bench of this Court on 6‑10‑1998.
2. Learned Additional Advocate‑General submits that‑‑ (i) no action will be taken against the civil servants serving in Education Department solely on the basis of the report of Pakistan Army which is being considered as a survey report; (ii) no ex pane action will be taken against any of the employee. In case in which any incriminating evidence is available against an employee, action will be taken after fulfilling necessary formalities as required by law including show‑cause notices and personal hearing; (iii) till such time the employee continue in the service of Education Department and action against them is not finalised, the salary due to them shall not be stopped. This satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed in view of the undertaking given by the learned Additional Advocate‑General. H.B.T./Z‑61/L Order accordingly.