CLD 2009

2009 PLP 1589 (CLD)

Jurisdiction / Court
Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
Decided Date
Show-Cause Notice No.EMD/233/701/2008-1935-41, dated 27th January, 2009, decided on 30th April, 2009.
Honorable Judges
Ali Azeem Ikram, Director (Enforcement)
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2009 PLP 1589 (CLD)
Forum / Court Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
Bench Members Ali Azeem Ikram, Director (Enforcement)
Parties
Primary Law Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 1589 (CLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 1589 (CLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan bench comprising: Ali Azeem Ikram, Director (Enforcement).

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 1589 (CLD) (). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984)

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 204-A & 498

Failure to have a whole time Secretary by the company

Imposition of penalty

In pursuance of subsection (1) of S.204-A of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, company which was a public listed-company, was required to have whole time Secretary, possessing prescribed qualifications, however, during the proceedings of inspection of the company under S.31 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, it was noticed that the company did not have any whole time Secretary

Default of S.204-A(1) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 was established and the Chief Executive and Directors, of the company had made themselves liable for the fine under S.498 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984

In exercise of powers conferred under S.498 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, instead of imposing maximum penalties, fine of Rs.5,000 only was imposed on Chief Executive and Directors of the company. Nemo for Messrs Progressive Insurance Company Ltd.

Judgment & Decree

(under section 204A read with section 498 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984) ALI AZEEM IKRAM, DIRECTOR (ENFORCEMENT).

This order shall dispose of the proceedings initiated against the Chief Executive and Directors of Messrs Progressive Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") for making default in complying with provisions of section 204A of the Companies 'Ordinance, 1984 ("the Ordinance").

2. The relevant facts for disposal of this case, briefly stated, are that in pursuance of subsection (1) of section 204A of the Ordinance, Progressive Insurance Company Limited, being a public listed-company, is required to have a whole time secretary, possessing prescribed qualification. However during the proceedings of inspection of the Company under section 231 of the Ordinance held from December 29 to December 31, 2008, it has been noticed that the Company does not have any whole time secretary. Mr. Minhaj Ahmed was shown as company Secretary in Annual Accounts of the Company for year, 2007 but was disclosed during afore-said on-site inspection that he just takes care of duties of secretary of the Company as an additional charge and he is actually appointed to serve as. Company Secretary in a related party Messrs Pakistan Industrial-and Commercial Leasing Company Limited. The failure of the Company to comply with the afore-said mandatory requirement necessitated action against the Chief Executive and Directors of the Company as provided under the Ordinance.

3. Show-cause notice dated January 27, 2009 under section 204A read with section 498 of the Ordinance was served on the Chief Executive and directors of the- Company, calling upon them to explain as to why appropriate action may not be taken against them under the law for afore-said contravention. The Company vide its letter dated January 30, 2009 requested-for grant of an extension of 30 days in time in order to submit 'reply to show-cause notice after seeking expert opinion and directions on the issue.

4. In order to provide an opportunity to the Chief Executive and Directors of the Company or their authorized representatives for appearing in person to explain the circumstances which let to non-compliances with said provisions of the Ordinance, a number to hearings in this matter were scheduled on dated 11th March, 2009 and 19th March, 2009 but every time it was adjourned on the Company's request.

5. The final hearing of the case was fixed for April 1, 2009 and hearing notices were sent to the Chief Executive and Directors of the Company wherein it was mentioned that this was final hearing opportunity and if no one appears therein on behalf of the Company, the matter would be decided ex parte on the merits of the case. However, none of the Directors or their authorized representative appeared in the final hearing of the case.

6. It has been observed that Directors of the Company have not only missed out .three consecutive opportunities of appearing in hearing of the case but they also failed to submit written reply to answer the queries raised in show-cause notice. However, the Company kept on seeking further extension in time to defer show-cause proceedings for indefinite period.

7. The Company should have deputed an authorized representative to participate in proceedings of the hearings of the case rather than seeking adjournment for 3 consecutive times for appearance of Mr. Sabur Rehman (the Major Shareholder) who was not present in the country. Being a public listed company, Progressive Insurance Company Limited is expected to exhibit more responsible and compliant corporate behaviour but circumstances of the case show that the Company did not comply with provisions of subsection. (1) section 204A of the Ordinance as well as those of Code of Corporate Governance.

8. Based on facts of the case and findings of the inspection as mentioned in para. 2 of this Order, the default of subsection (1) of section 204A of the Ordinance is established and the Chief Executive and Directors of the company have made themselves liable for fine under section 498 of the Ordinance, I, in exercise of powers conferred on me under section 498 of the Ordinance, instead of imposing maximum penalties, impose a fine of only Rs.5,000 each (Rupees five thousand only)' on the Chief Executive and Directors of the Company namely: -- Sr. No. Name Fine Rs.

1. Mr. Abdul Ghani, Chief Executive Officer 5,000

2. Mr. Manzoor Hussain Jilani, Chairman 5,000

3. Mr. Moeed Asghar Kidwani, Director 5,000

4. Mr. Rashid Munir Ahmed, Director 5,000

5. Mr. Waqar. Ahmed, Director 5,000

6. Mr. Syed Saleem Ahmed, Director 5,000

7. Mr. Nasir Munir Ahmed, Director 5,000 Total 35,000 Chief Executive and Directors of Messrs Progressive Insurance Company Limited are directed to deposit the afore-said fines aggregating to Rs.35,000 (Rupees thirty five thousand) in designated bank account maintained in the name of Securities and Exchange Commission with MCB Bank Limited within thirty (30) days from the receipt of this order and furnish vouchers issued in the name of Commission for information and record, failing which under the Land Revenue Act, 1967 shall be initiated against the Chief Executive and the Company, which may result in the attachment and sale of movable and immovable may please be noted that the said fines are imposed on the Chief Executive and Directors oral capacity and they are required to pay the said amounts from their personal resources. H.B.T./21/SEC Order accordingly.