CLC 1992

1992 PLP 1502 (CLC)

Before Imam Ali G. Kazi, J Versus GHULAM HAIDER and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Civil Revision Application No. 130 of 1990, heard on 28th May, 1991
Honorable Judges
Imam Ali G. Kazi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP 1502 (CLC)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Imam Ali G. Kazi, J
Parties Before Imam Ali G. Kazi, J Versus GHULAM HAIDER and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP 1502 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP 1502 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Imam Ali G. Kazi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP 1502 (CLC) (Before Imam Ali G. Kazi, J Versus GHULAM HAIDER and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Date of hearing: 28th May, 1991.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑O.XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2‑‑‑Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss.42 & 56‑‑‑Interim injunction, grant of‑‑‑Respondent earlier had filed case against applicant‑‑ Pending said case before Rent Controller, applicant filed suit for declaration and injunction in respect of same premises‑‑‑Suit filed by applicant was dismissed by Trial Court and applicant filed appeal against dismissal order of Trial Court‑‑‑Applicant, during pendency of appeal applied for grant of interim order; but application in that respect was rejected by Appellate Court‑‑ Ejectment case earlier filed by respondent against applicant, having finally been decided in favour of respondent and against applicant, appeal was filed by applicant before Supreme Court‑‑‑Applicant had obtained stay order from Supreme Court to the effect that he would nest be ejected from premises till decision of Supreme Court‑‑‑In view of decision of Rent Controller and pendency of appeal before Supreme Court, applicant would not be entitled to grant of injunction in his favour being barred by provisions of S. 56, Specific Relief Act, 1877. A.Z. Shams for Applicant. Respondents called absent.

Judgment & Decree

Date of hearing: 28th May, 1991. The dispute in this Revision Application relates to a premises bearing NoA7‑10‑S‑41 (Old No. 943‑944) and situated in Agra Taj Colony. A number of people have occupied land unauthorisedly and raised construction in Agra Taj Colony. Karachi Municipal Corporation, respondent No.3, therein have taken upon themselves to regularise such occupations by granting them leases on the basis of possession and other considerations. Since the property in dispute was claimed by the applicant and Ghulam Haider, respondent No.l, the lease in respect of said property has not been granted to any one as yet. It appears that in the year 1985 respondent Ghulam Haider filed a Rent Application seeking ejectment of applicant, Aziz Hussain claiming him to be his tenant of the premises mentioned above. While this rent case was pending before the Rent Controller, the applicant filed a suit for declaration and injunction in respect of the same premises. The 'suit was resisted by respondent Ghulam Haider and ultimately suit was dismissed. Applicant Aziz Hussain filed an appeal against the dismissal of his suit and his appeal was registered as Civil Appeal No.10 of 1990 in the Court of Fifth Additional District Judge Karachi (South). During the pendency of this appeal, applicant applied for grant of an interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 & Z, C.P.C. The appeal Judge by his order passed on 26‑3‑1990 rejected it. It is against this last order that the present application under section 115, C.P.C. has been filed. Mr. A.Z. Shams, Advocate appearing for the applicant, stated that respondent Ghulam Haider succeeded in the rent case and obtained order of ejectment of the applicant from the said premises. The applicant did not succeed in the appeal filed by him before this Court. He then took the matter to the Supreme Court of Pakistan where his appeal is pending. He has been able to obtain a stay order from the Supreme Court in his favour. In spite of such stay order in favour of the applicant he contends that he is entitled to grant of an interim injunction pending his appeal before the Vth Additional District Judge Karachi (South). Nobody has appeared today for the respondents. The admitted position in this Revision Application is that the matter is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan where the applicant has succeeded in obtaining stay order against the order of the judgment passed by the Rent Controller and the applicant will not be ejected till the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan. Besides the applicant in view of the decision of the Rent Controller and pendency of appeal before the Supreme Court of Pakistan will not be entitled to grant of injunction being barred by the provision of law contained in section 56 of the Specific Relief Act. No other ground for exercise of revisional jurisdiction has been urged by the Advocate appearing for the applicant. This revision application merits no consideration and is dismissed with costs. Mr. A.Z. Shams, Advocate for the applicant, states that since the appeal filed by the applicant is pending before the Appellate Court, a direction may be made for its expeditious disposal. This request appears to be reasonable and it is directed that the Fifth District Judge Karachi (South) shall decided the appeal within a period of 3 months from today. H.B.T./A‑1082/K Revision dismissed.