2015 PLP 157 (GBLR)
MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2015 PLP 157 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2015 PLP 157 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2015 PLP 157 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2015 PLP 157 (GBLR) (MUHAMMAD RIAZ — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Haq Nawaz, Senior Advocate along with Haji Jamal Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 345
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 34
Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), S.13
Qatl-i-amd, common intention, possessing unlicensed arms
Parties had patched up the matter through the Elders and Notables of the area and an application had been moved in that regard
Trial Court had confirmed the genuineness of the compromise arrived at between the parties; complainant party had pardoned accused for the sake of Almighty Allah
Complainant party had no objection, if convicted person was acquitted on the basis of said compromise
Accused was also convicted under S. 13 of Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 and was sentenced for 7 years' R.I. with fine
Accused had spent 5 years and 8 months in the judicial lock-up, said period was enough time spent behind the bars, remaining period, was deemed to have been undergone
Fine of Rs.5000 would stand as it was and would be deposited in the Government treasury
Accused was acquitted of the charge of murder under S.302/34, P.P.C.
Conviction of accused under S.13 of Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, would be deemed to have served in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner Muhammad Riaz son of Jahngir resident of Thore Chilas District Diamer had been convicted under section 302/34 vide FIR No. 02/2008 Police Station Thore Tehsil Chilas District Diamer by the Division Bench of Chief Court vide order dated 11-09-2013. He has been sentenced to life imprisonment and he has also been sentenced to 7 years' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 5000/- under section 13 Arms Ordinance Vide FIR No. 03/2008 Police Station Thore Tehsil Chilas District Diamer. Appeal has been preferred against the order of the GB Chief Court dated 11.09.2013. Meanwhile, the parties have patched up the matter through the elders and notables of the area and an application has also been moved in this Court in this regard. This Court vide order dated 19.08.2014 directed the trial Court i.e. Additional District and Sessions Judge Chilas to inquire into the matter regarding the genuineness of the compromise between the parties. The Additional Sessions Judge Diamer Chilas complied with the order of this Court and recorded the statements of the parties and submitted his recommendation to this Court vide his report dated 28-08-2014. In his order the additional Sessions Judge District Diamer has confirmed the genuineness of the compromise between the parties and the complainant party has pardoned the accused for the sake of Almighty Allah. He further reports that the complainant party has no objection if the convicted party is acquitted on the basis of the said compromise. The Trial Court has also checked the identities and scrutinized the photocopies of the National Identity Cards (NICs) and has also placed the said copies on the file. In this circumstance, we also accept the said compromise to be genuine. However, the conviction under 13 Arms Ordinance whereby the convict has been convicted for 07 years rigorous imprisonment in addition of fine amounting to Rs. 5000/= . In this regard counsel for the parties pleaded that the accused has spent 5 years and 08 months in the judicial lock-up. The same may be considered in his favour. We deem it proper that the period of 05 years and 08 months is enough time spent behind bar the remaining period is deemed to have been undergone. However, the fine of Rs. 5000/= stands as it is. The same shall be deposited in the Government treasury and the challan shall be placed on the record of this Court. The convicted person i.e. Muhammad Riaz is acquitted from the charge of murder under section 302/34 vide FIR No.02/2008 Police Station Thore and the conviction under section 13, A.O. vide FIR No. 03/2008 Police Station Thore Tehsil Chilas District Diamer in the case titled State v. Muhammad Riaz etc. vide order date 11-09-2013 passed by the Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court will be deemed to have been served. He shall be released forthwith if he is not required in any other case. The case is accordingly disposed of on the basis of the compromise. HBT/168/GB Order accordingly.