PLC(CS) 1989

1989 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

RIAZ-UL-HAQ CHISHTI Versus ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore High Court
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 21 of 1986, decided on 10th October, 1987.
Honorable Judges
Zia Mahmood Mirza, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Lahore High Court
Bench Members Zia Mahmood Mirza, J
Parties RIAZ-UL-HAQ CHISHTI Versus ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Zia Mahmood Mirza, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (RIAZ-UL-HAQ CHISHTI Versus ALLAMA IQBAL OPEN UNIVERSITY). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Ch. Munir Ahmad for Petitioner.
  • Saad Ullah Mumtaz for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199--Civil service--Petitioner charge-sheeted, suspended and subsequently transferred--Petitioner's continuation under suspension impugned with prayer that his transfer be declared as unlawful and without jurisdiction--During pendency of petition, petitioner's conditional offer to resign accepted by respondent and he subsequently resigned and his resignation was accepted by respondent--Petitioner's resignation and acceptance of same on terms and conditions set up by such petitioner not denied--Constitutional petition having become infructuous was disposed of with direction that if dues mentioned in petitioner's resignation had not been paid, he might approach the respondent fur payment thereof and in event of default could again approach the Court.

Judgment & Decree

Petitioner who at the relevant time was an Upper Division Clerk in the respondent-University was charge-sheeted and suspended on 8-12-1985 and some inquiry was also instituted against him. He, therefore, approached this Court praying that "the act of the respondents in holding the inquiry on the basis of charge-sheet dated 8-7-1985 which has already been probed into and the petitioner exonerated and the continuation of the petitioner under suspension for an indefinite period, be declared as being without lawful authority, illegal, void. and of no legal effect and without jurisdiction." It was further prayed that transfer of the petitioner from Islamabad to Quetta be also declared as unlawful and without jurisdiction and that "a direction be issued to the respondents to take the petitioner on duty and he be allowed to perform his official functions".

2. It appears that during the pendency of the writ petition, petitioner made an application (C.M. 126 of 1986) stating therein that he wanted to resign from his post on the conditions that the respondent cancelled the impugned order of his suspension, paid the salaries to him from 13-6-1985 upto date as also the other earned benefits. Respondent submitted a reply to this application dated 5-3-1986 stating therein "the respondent University is prepared to accept the resignation of the petitioner and to cancel impugned suspension order, making payment of the salaries to the petitioner excluding subsistence allowance already drawn by him and also agree to pay all benefits admissible to the petitioner from the date of his appointment".

3. Learned counsel appearing for the University states that the petitioner has since submitted his resignation, which has been accepted. He has produced photo copy of the office order dated 7-3-1987 which has been placed on the record. It shows that the Vice-Chancellor had accepted the resignation of the petitioner dated 5-10-1986 with immediate effect on the following terms and conditions: - "(1) His suspension order issued vide office order No. F.2-6/85-Admn. dated 13-6-1985 and subsequent extension made in the suspension period from time to time shall be withdrawn. (2) He will be paid salary upto the period he performed duty at the Regional Office, Quetta which was his place of posting i.e. 30-8-1985. (3) The intervening period shall be treated as E.O.L. (without pay and allowances). (4) He will be paid Gratuity and G. P. Fund as per rules."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no contact with his client and, therefore, he does not know as to whether the dues, in fact, have been paid to him or not. The fact that the petitioner has resigned and his resignation has been accepted on the terms and conditions aforestated is not denied. That being so, the writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. It is, however, observed that if the dues mentioned in the office order aforementioned have not been paid to the petitioner, he can approach the University authorities for payment thereof and in the event of default, he can again approach this Court. With these observations, writ petition stands disposed of in limine. AA./R-112/L Order accordingly.