PCRLJ 2012

2012 P Cr (PLP)

Mst. NASREEN BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
2011-December-20
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2012 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties Mst. NASREEN BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. NASREEN BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Syed Naveed Abbas for Petitioners and Petitioners in person.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498 & 497(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.420/468/471

Telegraph Act (XIII of 1885), S. 25-D

Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, forgery for purpose of cheating, using as genuine a forged document, causing annoyance

Ad interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of

Further inquiry

Accused, who were mother and son, had allegedly subjected the complainant (husband) to torture, extended threats to cause his 'qatl-e-amd', made interpolations in the Nikahnama and also caused annoyance to complainant by making phone calls

Genuineness of entries in Nikahnama was to be determined by the Family Court as the same had exclusive jurisdiction in that respect

Complainant's contention that certain columns in Nikahnama were left blank could not be accepted, as same could be agitated before the Family Court

Nikahnama was duly registered and affidavit of Nikah khawan had been submitted to the effect that the complainant and witnesses had put their signatures after completion of the Nikahnama and all entries were made before the signatures

Suit for maintenance and recovery of dower had admittedly been filed by accused against complainant

Accused's contention that they had been roped in the case with malice was not without substance

Reasonable doubts existed as to the veracity of allegations levelled by the complainant and case clearly needed further inquiry within the meaning of S.497(2), Cr.P.C.

Ad interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused was confirmed, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

RAUF AHMAD SHEIKH, J.

Both these petitions arise out of case F.I.R. No. 798 of 2011, dated 16-10-2011, under sections 420/468/471, P.P.C. and 25-D of Telegraph Act, Police Station Ghazi Abad, Lahore so are being decided through this single order as questions for determination therein are interlinked.

2. Allegedly the petitioners, who are mother and son inter se subjected the complainant to torture, extended threats to cause his "Qatl-e-amd", made interpolations in the Nikah Nama and also caused annoyance by making calls through Mobile phone. It is alleged that the petitioner Mst. Nasreen Bibi obtained divorce from her former husband and contracted marriage with the complainant but subsequently made interpolations in Columns Nos.16 and 17 of the Nikah Nama.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the petitioner Mst. Nasreen Bibi is legally wedded wife of the complainant and due to matrimonial dispute, he had got the false case registered against her and her real son with malice. It is contended that no incident of violence or extension of threats ever took place. It is urged that in fact the petitioner Mst. Nasreen Bibi has filed a suit for recovery of dower and maintenance and due to grudge nourished over it, he has lodged the false F.I.R.

4. The learned counsel for the complainant has contended that infact Columns Nos.16 and 17 of the Nikah Nama were left blank at the time of Nikah and subsequently the petitioner in connivance with the Nikah Khawan had made unauthorized entries in it. It is urged that dower of Rs.50,000 was fixed but no property was transferred in favour of the wife.

5. The question pertaining to the genuineness of entries in the Nikah Nama is to be determined by the learned Family Court as it has exclusive jurisdiction in respect thereto. The contention that the Columns Nos. 16 and 17 were left blank cannot be accepted at this stage. The complainant may agitate this contention before the Family Court and prove the same, if so desired. The Nikah Nama is duly registered and an affidavit of the Nikah Khawan has been submitted to the effect that the complainant and witnesses put their signatures after completion of the Nikah Nama and all entries were made before their signatures. Admittedly the suit for maintenance and recovery of dower has been filed by the petitioner Mst. Nasreen Bibi against the complainant. In these circumstances, the contention of the petitioners that they have been roped in the false case with malice is not without substance. Prima facie, a reasonable doubt exists as to the veracity of the allegations levelled by the complainant and case clearly needs further inquiry within the meanings of section 497(2), Cr.P.C. It is an established law that doubt is to be resolved in favour of the accused even at the bail stage. For the reasons supra, the petition is accepted and ad interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the petitioners is confirmed subject to their furnishing fresh bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 2,00,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. M.W.A./N-2/L Pre-arrest bail, confirmed.