SCMR 2012

2012 PLP 54 (SCMR)

Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus G.M. (P & D) WATER, WAPDA and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.2033-L of 2010, decided on 12th July, 2011.
Honorable Judges
Jawwad S. Khawaja and Mian Saqib Nisar, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2012 PLP 54 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Jawwad S. Khawaja and Mian Saqib Nisar, JJ
Parties Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus G.M. (P & D) WATER, WAPDA and others — Respondents
Primary Law Sanctioning Procedure of Grants of Widow Welfare Fund Rules
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 54 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Sanctioning Procedure of Grants of Widow Welfare Fund Rules as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 54 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Jawwad S. Khawaja and Mian Saqib Nisar, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 54 (SCMR) (Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus G.M. (P & D) WATER, WAPDA and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Sanctioning Procedure of Grants of Widow Welfare Fund Rules

Representation

  • Mian Jaffar Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
  • Faiz-ur-Rehman, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 12th July, 2011.

Headnotes / Summary

(Against the judgment dated 5-11-2010 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Writ Petition No. 20970 of 2009).

Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199 & 185(3)

Wapda Welfare Fund established for its retired employees

Death of petitioner's husband after four years of his retirement from Service

Petitioner-widow falling within category of beneficiaries of such Fund filed application after 17 years of his death for granting benefits thereunder

Denial of such benefits to petitioner by Authority for her application being barred by time

Dismissal of petitioner's constitutional petition by High Court

Validity

Such Fund had attributes of a Private Trust

Persons responsible to administer such Fund for being trustees were responsible to make payments to beneficiaries in accordance with its rules

Petitioner would be entitled to benefits under such Fund from date of making application, but not to prior distributions already made

Non-making of application within time would not mean that petitioner had forfeited all rights as beneficiary even in respect of period starting with her application

No provision existed in Rules denying such benefits to widow for her failure to make an application within time

Petitioner's status as a beneficiary of such Fund still existed, thus, her rights could not be barred for all times to come

Supreme Court set aside impugned judgment and directed Authority to make payments to petitioner from date of her application as being made to other similarly placed widows.

Judgment & Decree

JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J.

The petitioner admittedly is the widow of a former employee of WAPDA who retired from service on 16-5-1988 on attaining the age of superannuation and thereafter died on 27-6-1992. The widow falls within the category of beneficiaries of the WAPDA Welfare Fund as per rules of the said Fund. However, she is being denied the benefits. Furthermore, it is evident from the record that other widows, who are similarly placed to the petitioner Mst. Nasim Akhtar, are receiving payment from the WAPDA Welfare Fund. The only reason why the petitioner is being denied similar payments and treatment is that she did not apply for benefits available to widows within the period prescribed by rules framed under the said Fund. 3(sic.) After examining the record and relevant rules it is clear to us that the Fund has the attributes of a private Trust. The persons responsible for administering the WAPDA Welfare Fund are therefore, trustees responsible for making payments to the beneficiaries in accordance with the constitution of the Fund and the rules framed thereunder. It may well be that due to prior distributions already made, the petitioner is not entitled to receive payments from the Fund until the date she applied to the Welfare Fund as a beneficiary. This, however, does not mean that the petitioner has forfeited all rights as a beneficiary even in respect of the period starting with her application which was made on 16-6-2009. The date of the application is not in dispute between the parties.

4. The petitioner had filed Writ Petition No.20970 of 2009 to assert her right as beneficiary being widow of a former WAPDA employee. This petition has been dismissed on the ground of limitation as recorded in pare 4 of the impugned judgment. The said para, for ease of reference, is reproduced as under:-- "

4. Perusal of record reveals that the husband of the petitioner was retired on 16-5-1988 who was drawing pension and expired on 27-6-1992. The petitioner never applied for the welfare fund and the instant claim of the petitioner is badly time barred who has claimed widow welfare fund after lapse of 17 years. Rule 3 of "Sanctioning Procedure of Grants of Widow Welfare Fund Rules" the petitioner's prayer is badly barred by time." The petitioner undeniably is a beneficiary of the Fund, being widow of a former employee. Moreover, there is no provision in the Rules that any widow would lose her benefits if she does not make an application within time.

5. In view of the foregoing discussion, we are of the opinion that the petitioner's rights cannot be barred for all times to come because her status as a beneficiary exists even today. In this view of the matter, we find the impugned judgment does not proceed on a correct interpretation of the law or the responsibility of those administering the WAPDA Welfare Fund in a capacity akin to that of the trustees of a private Trust.

6. We, therefore, convert this petition into an appeal and allow the same. The impugned judgment is set aside. The petitioner Mst. Naseem Akhtar shall be entitled to the benefits payable to widows of former employees of WAPDA and the respondent-department shall ensure payments to her in line with the payments which are admittedly being made to other widows who are similarly placed. These payments shall be made w.e.f. the date of her application i.e. 16-6-2009. S.A.K./N-13/SC Appeal accepted.