1989 PLP 1500(2) (SCMR)
S.M. NAZIR‑‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CO‑OPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION and
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1500(2) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | S.M. NAZIR‑‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CO‑OPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION and |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1500(2) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1500(2) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1500(2) (SCMR) (S.M. NAZIR‑‑Petitioner Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CO‑OPERATIVE FINANCE CORPORATION and). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Talib H. Rizvi, Advocate, instructed by S. Ali Imam Naqvi, Advocate‑on Record for Petitioner.
- MA. Qureshi, Advocate for Respondent No.l.
- M. Akhtar, Additional Advocate‑General with M.M. Saeed Beg for Respondent No.3.
- Date of hearing: 29th March, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 15th April, 1985 of the Lanore High Court in Writ Petition No.2715 of 1984). (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ‑‑‑ArL185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal was granted on the condition of the submission of an undertaking by the petitioner. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), 0XXXIX, Rr.l & 1‑‑Leave to appeal granted‑‑Stay order already granted carrying the condition of interest ordered to be continued till disposal of appeal, without condition.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal having been granted on the condition of the submission of an undertaking by the petitioner, he has submitted the undertaking. It reads as follows:‑
1. That the abovenoted petition is pending before this Honourable Court. 2.That the following undertaking is submitted by S.M. Nazir, Proprietor of S.M. Nazir & Sons, near Firdous Market, Lahore.
3. That the petitioner undertakes that an amount of Rs.1,70.075 which is said to have been withdrawn by him in his account with the respondent. He undertakes to make the payment of this amount to the Bank in instalments.
4. That the payment will be made in instalments spreading over a period of two years.
5. That the respondent will also give an undertaking to this Honourable Court that m case they recover this amount from their Manager Rana Muhammad Saleem or from any other source, they will refund the money back to the petitioner.
6. That the payment made to the respondent will be under protest and without any prejudice to the submissions made by the petitioner in the above noted appeal.
7. That the petitioner has given this undertaking of his own free will and without any undue influence. It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that the above noted undertaking may kindly be entertained. Submitted by Sd/‑xxxxxxxxxxxx (S.M. Naur) Petitioner/Appellant. Mr. MA. Qureshi learned counsel for the respondent, has objected to the form of the undertaking. After hearing both the sides, at length, we are of the view that the petitioner has substantially complied with the condition laid down in the leave granted order. Objection is over ruled. Regarding the stay order granted on 16‑6‑1985 carrying the condition of interest, in view of the grant of leave to appeal (which is now, after hearing the objections from the respondents' side, is declared and held as open for all the parties concerned), we consider it just and fair to continue the said order till disposal of the appeal, without condition. In the foregoing context it has become necessary to implead the manager and all others concerned with the fraud directly or indirectly. Order accordingly. It is clarified that the parties, in view of the open leave to appeal, shall be at liberty to take all the available points including whether, in case several persons are involved in the fraud, the recovery should not be made from all and if it is sought to be made from one only whether it is not necessary to show bona fides for not recovering from others and effect thereof. Appeal shall come up for hearing in accordance with the normal practice of the Court. Security shall be Rs.5,
000. MA.K./S‑291/S Leave granted.