PLC(CS) 2007

2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

ABDUL SALIM Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Department of Education Secondary, N.-W.F.P., Peshawar and others

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.408-P of 2001, decided on 26th December, 2003.
Honorable Judges
Mian Muhammad Ajmal and Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Mian Muhammad Ajmal and Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan, JJ
Parties ABDUL SALIM Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Department of Education Secondary, N.-W.F.P., Peshawar and others
Primary Law North-West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: North-West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mian Muhammad Ajmal and Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ABDUL SALIM Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Department of Education Secondary, N.-W.F.P., Peshawar and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

North-West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974)

Representation

  • Assistant Director (Education) for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 26th December, 2003.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 27-8-2001 passed by N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal, Peshawar in Service Appeal No.1440 of 1997).

S. 4

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)

Termination from service

Grounds of termination, non-mentioning of

Change of Government

Irregularities committed at the time of appointment

Effect

Civil servant was appointed as school teacher in the year, 1995 and had been receiving salary for two years regularly

In year 1997, the authorities terminated the services of the civil servant and his departmental appeal was also dismissed

Service Tribunal maintained the decision of the authorities

Validity

In the order of removal from service it was only mentioned that the appointment of the civil servant was found illegal, ab initio void and against the prescribed rules but no details in that regard were mentioned therein

Absence of such reasons by itself was sufficient to dub the removal as mala fide

If there had been any specific reason and same had been intimated to the civil servant through show-cause notice, the civil servant might have been able to defend himself

For the irregularities committed by department itself regarding appointment of candidate, the appointees could not be condemned subsequently with the change of heads in department or on the upper level

Government being institution in perpetuity, its orders could not be reversed simply because the heads had changed

Such act of departmental authorities was unjustified when the candidate was otherwise fully qualified to hold the job

Supreme Court converted the petition for leave to appeal into appeal, set aside the order of termination and reinstated the civil servant in service

Appeal was allowed. Petitioner in person.

Judgment & Decree

SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN, J.

Abdus Salim son of Kamal Din, former C.T. Teacher at Government Middle School, Sherdara, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment, dated 27-8-2001 of N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal which had dismissed his appeal against removal from service vide departmental order, dated 13-2-1997.

2. The petitioner was appointed as C.T. Teacher (BPS-9) and posted at Government Middle School, Sherdara, Swabi vide order, dated 25-4-1995. His service book was prepared and he was paid monthly salaries regularly when on 13-2-1997, Divisional Director of Education (Male) Secondary, Mardan Division, Mardan dispensed with his services. His departmental representation having not been responded to, he resorted to the Service Tribunal.

3. The advertisement for the post in question having been published in Daily Mashriq, Peshawar is at page 30 against which the petitioner got interviewed in Government High School No.1, Mardan. His appointment order as C.T. Teacher is not disputed. The order of removal from service (page 26) reveals the grounds of his termination to the effect that his "appointment was found illegal, ab initio void and against the prescribed rules."

4. So far as the details thereof are concerned, it is nowhere mentioned as to how the appointment was illegal, as to how was it void ab initio and what were the prescribed rules violated in case of his appointment. The absence of such reasons by itself are sufficient to dub the removal as mala fide. Had there been any specific reason and had such reason been intimated to the petitioner through a show-cause notice, he might have been able to defend himself, but for the shortcomings of his own and not those of the department.

5. So far as the qualifications of the petitioner are concerned, at the time of his appointment/interview on 10-8-1995, he was graduate since April, 1985, B.Ed. Since 1993, M.A. Pushto since 1989 and M.A. Urdu since April, 1992, had a certificate in basic education for Afghan Refugees since August, 1984 and had remained S.V. Teacher in the Organization of Afghan Refugees from November, 1993 to April, 1995. One cannot imagine how was he not qualified for a post of C.T. Teacher in BPS-9.

6. For any irregularity whatsoever, if committed by the department itself, the appointee cannot be harmed, damaged or condemned subsequently when it occurs to the department that it had itself committed some irregularities qua any appointment. This Court has on numerous occasions held that for the irregularities committed by the department at itself qua the appointment of a candidate, the appointees cannot be condemned subsequently with the change of the heads in the department or on the upper level. Government is an institution in perpetuity and its orders cannot be reversed simply because the heads have changed. Such act of departmental authorities is all the more unjustified when the candidate is otherwise fully qualified to hold the job.

7. In the circumstances, the petition after conversion into appeal is hereby accepted. The impugned judgment, dated 27-8-2001 is set aside and, the order of termination from service, dated 13-2-1997 is set aside being void in law and petitioner is hereby reinstated in service. In the circumstances of the case, he shall not be given the back-benefits but his pay fixation shall be done with reference to and in continuation of the date of his initial appointment. M.H./A-101/SC Appeal allowed.