1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
ABDUL HAMEED FORESTER Versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, SIALKOT and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Malik Abdul Aziz, Member-I |
| Parties | ABDUL HAMEED FORESTER Versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, SIALKOT and another |
| Primary Law | Civil services |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil services as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Malik Abdul Aziz, Member-I.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (ABDUL HAMEED FORESTER Versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, SIALKOT and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- MA. Riaz for Appellant.
- Abbas Raza, DA. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 11th August, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Penalties of recovery of loss and censure were imposed on civil servant who was forester, on allegation that seven tyres alongwith rims were stolen from water tanker parked in area under his control due to his negligence
Civil servant as forester was duty bound to take proper care of Government water tanker and should have made adequate arrangements for safety of water tanker parked at forest nursery in his block
Civil servant not only failed to make adequate arrangements for safety of Government property falling within his jurisdiction, but reported matter of theft to police station after expiry of 18 to 20 hours which was clear cut negligence of duty and violence of Rules
Government have suffered loss in form of theft of tyres due to civil servant's inefficiency and negligence, he was rightly held responsible for such loss and was punished
Civil servant having failed to pinpoint and establish any legal defect on point of law or fact in departmental proceedings undertaken by Authorities against him and charge levelled against him having stood proved from record beyond any doubt, orders of Authorities passed against civil servant could not be interfered with.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 199/725 of 1987, decided on 5th October, 1991. Civil services
Penalties of recovery of loss and censure were imposed on civil servant who was forester, on allegation that seven tyres alongwith rims were stolen from water tanker parked in area under his control due to his negligence
Civil servant as forester was duty bound to take proper care of Government water tanker and should have made adequate arrangements for safety of water tanker parked at forest nursery in his block
Civil servant not only failed to make adequate arrangements for safety of Government property falling within his jurisdiction, but reported matter of theft to police station after expiry of 18 to 20 hours which was clear cut negligence of duty and violence of Rules
Government have suffered loss in form of theft of tyres due to civil servant's inefficiency and negligence, he was rightly held responsible for such loss and was punished
Civil servant having failed to pinpoint and establish any legal defect on point of law or fact in departmental proceedings undertaken by Authorities against him and charge levelled against him having stood proved from record beyond any doubt, orders of Authorities passed against civil servant could not be interfered with. MA. Riaz for Appellant. Abbas Raza, DA. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 11th August, 1991.