CLD 2013

2013 PLP 1129 (CLD)

File No.493/MERGER-CCP/2012

Jurisdiction / Court
Competition Commission of Pakistan
Decided Date
2012-October-9
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2013 PLP 1129 (CLD)
Forum / Court Competition Commission of Pakistan
Bench Members N/A
Parties File No.493/MERGER-CCP/2012
Primary Law Competition Act (XIX of 2010)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2013 PLP 1129 (CLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Competition Act (XIX of 2010) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2013 PLP 1129 (CLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Competition Commission of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2013 PLP 1129 (CLD) (File No.493/MERGER-CCP/2012). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Competition Act (XIX of 2010)

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 2(e), 11 & 31(1)(d)(i)

Competition (Merger Control) Regulations, 2007, Regln.6

Pre-merger application

Applicant/acquirer, had submitted a pre-merger application regarding the clearance from the Competition Commission of Pakistan the acquisition of corporation

Applicant was a dominant player in the relevant product market and would further strengthen its dominant position in the relevant market

Transaction involved the proposed acquisition of the merger corporation by way of contracts, assets and liabilities of the business segments by corporation

Apart from lessening of competition, elimination of a competitor also would reduce the choices available to consumer

Availability of choice was an important determinant of a competitive market

Reduction in choices available to consumers was the concern of the Competition Commission

Bench and the merger parties, however, agreed that a written undertaking by the applicant/acquirer to the effect that, merged corporation's products would continue to be available for a period of three years from the date of closing of transaction in Pakistan

Since the applicant had given a written undertaking to the Competition Commission the Bench authorized the acquisition under S.31(1)(d)(i) of the Competition Act, 2010.

Judgment & Decree

Nestle S.A. ("Nestle or the Acquirer") through its legal advisors, Ijaz Ahmed and Associates, submitted a pre-merger application, dated 6th June, 2012, pursuant to section 11 of the Competition Act, 2010 (hereinafter the "Act"), regarding the clearance from the Competition Commission of Pakistan (the "Commission") the acquisition of the Nutrition Business of Pfizer Inc. ("Pfizer").

2. The transaction involves an acquisition of the Nutrition Business of Pfizer Inc. ("Pfizer") by Nestle. The relevant product market of the merger parties comprises of two parts, Infant and Follow-On Milk ("IFFO") (0-12 months) and Growing-Up Milk ("GUM") (12 months +) the Acquirer is engaged in the relevant product market and is already enjoying a dominant position in the relevant product market by having .....% & ....% market share in IFFO milk and GUM in terms of volume, respectively. The target Pfizer, which is also engaged in the same line of business and is having ....% and .....% market share in IFFO milk and GUM respectively. The post-merger market shares of the acquirer would be ....% and .....% in IFFO milk and GUM, respectively. Once transaction is consummated, the already held dominant position of the acquirer Nestle would further strengthen.

3. Nestle is a dominant player in the relevant product markets and would further strengthen its dominant position in the relevant markets, which raised competition concerns for the Commission. Therefore, the Commission initiated the IInd phase review of the transaction and granted its approval subject to conditions documented below in this Order. A. UNDERTAKINGS (i) Nestle S.A.

4. Nestle S.A. was incorporated under the laws of Switzerland, and is active worldwide in the production, marketing and sale of a large variety of food and beverage products including infant nutrition formula milk. Nestle is present in Pakistan through its wholly owned subsidiary, Nestle Pakistan Limited, which produces the following relevant products in Pakistan:-- IFFO Milk: NAN, Lactogen, AL110, Lactogen Recover, Pre-NAN. GUM: Lactogen 3 and NNS. (ii) Pfizer Inc.

5. Pfizer Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America. In 2009, Pfizer acquired Wyeth LLC, USA ("Wyeth") whereby it acquired the Nutrition business of Wyeth. Pfizer's presence in the relevant markets in Pakistan is through its subsidiary Wyeth Pakistan Limited. Pfizer Nutrition, formerly Wyeth Nutrition, is a global pediatric nutrition business unit of Pfizer which includes speciality infant and toddler formulas, follow-on formulas, as well as maternal and adult nutrition products and is present in Pakistan in the IFFO milk and GUM market through the following products. IFFO Milk: SMA 1 and 2, Promil Gold and S-26 LF. GUM: Progress Gold and SMA. B. TRANSACTION

6. The transaction involves the proposed acquisition of the Nutrition Business of Pfizer by way of contracts, assets and liabilities of the business segment by Nestle. Pursuant to a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement between Nestle and Pfizer, Nestle will acquire the global infant nutrition business of Pfizer Nutrition for an aggregate purchase price of USD ........ (approx. PKR .......).

7. As part of the current transaction, the business (contracts, assets and liabilities) of Wyeth Pakistan Limited relating to IFFO milk and GUM will be transferred to Nestle designated entity in Pakistan i.e., Nestle Pakistan Limited. C. COMPETITION ASSESSMENT

8. Subsection (1) of section 11 of the Act lays down the substantive test for reviewing a merger, that is, whether a merger "substantially lessens competition by creating or strengthening a dominant position in the relevant market". Section 2(e) of the Act defines dominant position as: "dominant position" of one undertaking or several undertakings in a relevant market shall be deemed to exist if such undertaking or undertakings have the ability to behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors, customers, consumers and suppliers and the position of an undertaking shall be presumed to be dominant if its share of the relevant market exceeds forty per cent.

9. In the instant case, the Acquirer is already enjoying a dominant position in the relevant product market by having .....per cent and ....per cent market share, in terms of volume, in IFFO milk and GUN, respectively. The pre-merger market shares, in terms of volumes and sales, of the merger parties as well as all that of their competitors in the relevant product markets are given in the table below:-- ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....

10. Regulation 6 of the Competition (Merger Control) Regulations, 2007 (the "CMCR") lays down the factors in which the Commission may consider when determining substantial lessening of competition in the relevant market. One such factor which the Commission may consider when determining substantial lessening of competition in the relevant market is "whether the merger situation will result in the removal of an effective competitor." Apart from lessening of competition, elimination of a competitor also reduces the choices available to consumer. Availability of choice is an important determinant of a competitive market.1 Reduction in choices available to consumers was the concern of the Commission, which prompted the initiation of IInd Phase review.

11. A hearing was held with the parties to the merger on 2nd October, 2012, wherein the Bench raised the concerns of elimination of choices available to the consumers. The Council for the Acquirer apprised the Bench that Pfizer has no manufacturing facilities pertaining to IFFO and GUM in Pakistan. Pfizer's presence in the Pakistan market is through import of relevant products from Ireland and Singapore. The relevant products are imported by distributors which are associated with Pfizer as well as by independent distributors. It was further represented that Nestle would continue to allow the imports of Pfizer's nutrition products; thereby ensuring the choices available to consumer will not be reduced. D. REMEDIES/CONDITIONS

12. The Bench and the merger parties agreed that a written undertaking by Nestle to the effect that "Pfizer (Wyeth) products will continue to be available for a period of three years from the date of the closing of the transaction in Pakistan" will assuage the concerns raised by the Commission.

13. Since Nestle has given a written undertaking to the Commission that "Pfizer (Wyeth) products will continue to be available for a period of three years from the date of the closing of the transaction in Pakistan"; the Bench hereby authorize the acquisition under section 31(1)(d)(i) of the Act.

14. It is so ordered. HBT/9/CCP Application allowed.