1994 P Cr (PLP)
THE STATE — Appellant Versus MUSA KHAN — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | THE STATE — Appellant Versus MUSA KHAN — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (THE STATE — Appellant Versus MUSA KHAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Mian Rafiquddin for Respondent
- This appeal has been referred by the State through Advocate-General from the order of the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Peshawar, dated 27-10-1986, whereby the accused-respondent was acquitted of the charge under sections 39-A and 39-L of the Local Council Ordinance, 1979.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 39-K & 39-L
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 417 & 4(1)(h)
Complaint initially was not made by the competent Authority as envisaged by S.39-S of North-West Frontier Province Local Government Ordinance, 1979 and mere endorsement on the Police Report by an Election Officer could not make it a complaint in legal sense
Trial Court, therefore, had rightly acquitted the accused
Appeal against acquittal of accused was dismissed accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Mian Rafiquddin for Respondent Date of hearing: 16th March, 1994. This appeal has been referred by the State through Advocate-General from the order of the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Peshawar, dated 27-10-1986, whereby the accused-respondent was acquitted of the charge under sections 39-A and 39-L of the Local Council Ordinance, 1979.
2. It is alleged against the accused that on the day of election to the Local Council he was found canvassing in the premises of the election and violated sections 39-K and 39-L of the Local Council Ordinance in bringing out the ballot-box and dashing it to the ground.
3. I heard both sides and went through the record. The sole reason for acquittal of the accused from the offence was that no complaint had been made by the competent election authority as required by section 39-S and therefore, the proceedings in the case on the police report were illegal. The record shows that the present proceedings were initiated against the accused on the report of the S. H. O. Police Station Kabuli. The learned counsel appearing in support of the appeal submitted that there appears endorsement of the officer on Special Duty of the Provincial Election Authority N. -W. F. P. on the challan to the effect "Forwarded please", which according to him satisfied the requirements of law of the complaint made by the Election Authority. This argument is without substance. The complaint initially should have been by the competent authority as envisaged by section 39-S and the mere endorsement by an Officer of the Election Office would not make it a complaint in legal sense. The definition of the complaint in the Criminal Procedure Code is to the effect that:-- "Complaint".
'Complaint' means the allegation orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but it does include the report of a Police Officer." The police report in this case does not satisfy the requirement of the complaint and mere endorsement by an Election Officer would also not render this police report as a complaint. The learned trial Judge was, therefore, correct in holding that in absence of a complaint by the competent Election Authority the proceedings against the accused-respondent would amount to abuse of process of law and, therefore, rightly acquitted him. I find no substance in this appeal and accordingly dismiss it. N. H. Q./1613/P Appeal dismissed.