YLR 2013

2013 PLP 510 (YLR)

DANIYAL M. ASLAM — Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD WASAM KHAN and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh
Decided Date
Criminal Revision Applications Nos.28 and 85 of 2012, decided on 1st October, 2012.
Honorable Judges
Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2013 PLP 510 (YLR)
Forum / Court Sindh
Bench Members Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, J
Parties DANIYAL M. ASLAM — Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD WASAM KHAN and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2013 PLP 510 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2013 PLP 510 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: Sadiq Hussain Bhatti, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2013 PLP 510 (YLR) (DANIYAL M. ASLAM — Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD WASAM KHAN and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Date of hearing: 25th September, 2012.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 439 & 516-A

Supredari order, review of

Scope

Application of peti-tioner was allowed by Trial Court and case property was ordered to be handed over to him but subsequently on an application filed by respondent the order was withdrawn and application of petitioner was recalled

Validity

Trial Court had no power under Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, to review its own order and all orders regarding disposal of property were final except ex parte order

Revision application was allowed, earlier order passed by Trial Court was revived as the subsequent order passed with regard to same property was violative of law. Fazal Hussain v. The State 1976 PCr.LJ 747 rel. Muhammad Sajjad Abbasi for Applicant (in Criminal Revision No.28 of 2012). Hamid Munir for Application (in Criminal Revision Application No.85 of 2012). Abrar Ali, A.P.-G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

SADIQ HUSSAIN BHATTI, J.

This order will dispose of Criminal Revision Application No.28 of 2012 and Criminal Revision Application No.85 of 2012. The applicant Daniyal Muhammad Aslam, Assistant Manager Finance of Messrs CATCOS (Pvt.) Limited and Muhammad Wassam Khan have preferred these Criminal Revision Applications against the order dated 19-12-2011 and 17-1-2012 passed by the learned IVth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karachi East on the application under section 516-A, Cr.P.C. passed by him. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant Daniyal Muhammad Aslam that R & Ps of the above matter may be called and examined as to the legality, correctness and the propriety of the order and set aside the order dated 17-1-2012 and cancel/recall the order dated 19-12-2011 passed by the learned IVth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karachi East. He has further contended that the Applicant-Company purchased the Generator Power Link Stanford 30 KVA Diesel from Messrs Sikandar and Company on 13-5-2008 and subsequently this Generator was sold to Mr. Ali Raza on 18-10-2011, showing his identity as Director of Bukhari Farm Houses, Super Highway for consideration of Rs.4,50,000 through Pay Order of NIB Bank, 42-C, Tauheed Commercial Phase-IV, DHA, Karachi, but the said amount was not deposited in the Applicant-Company and same was found to be fake and bogus as such F.I.R. was lodged bearing Crime No.780 of 2011 at Police Station Ferozabad, Karachi. The applicant submitted an application under section 516-A, Cr.P.C. bearing No. 2277/2011 for release of case property on superdary basis. The Court of learned IVth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karachi East after hearing the Parties, allowed the application vide order dated 19-12-2011 released the case property subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.4,00,

000. The respondent No.1 Muhammad Wassam Khan (Applicant in Criminal Revision Application No.85 of 2012) also filed an application under section 516-A Cr.P.C. bearing No.2288 of 2011 for release of same Generator on superdary basis. On 17-1-2012 after hearing both the applicants and the learned State Counsel, learned IVth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karachi East passed the order by which it recalled the earlier order dated 19-12-2011 and dismissed the application submitted by the respondent No.1 Muhammad Wassam Khan on the main ground that the ownership of the property is not yet decided. Hence, both the applications were dismissed. After due consideration of the above facts and circumstances of the above matter, cardinal point, which is involved in this case is once an order on the application is passed can another joint order be passed in the same matter regarding same case property. In my view, this amounts to reviewing its own order, which is violative of law. In the case of Fazal Hussain v. The State (1976 PCr.LJ 747) wherein it has been held that:-- "the order passed in favour of the applicant could not be modified as there is no power of review given under the Criminal Procedure Code and the said order had become final." Bare perusal of the dictum laid down reveals that the Court has no power to review its own order given to it under the Cr.P.C. and all the orders regarding disposal of the property except ex parte are final. In view of the above dictum laid down, the order passed on 19-12-2011 shall prevail and subsequent order passed with regard to the same property is violative of the law, hence Criminal Revision Application No.28 of 2012 is allowed, and Criminal Revision Application No.85 of 2012 is dismissed. MH/D-11/K Order accordingly.