2015 PLP 910 (CLD)
NATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus SHAHID NASEEM, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SPECIALIZED COMPANIES DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
| Citation | 2015 PLP 910 (CLD) |
| Forum / Court | Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | NATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus SHAHID NASEEM, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SPECIALIZED COMPANIES DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2015 PLP 910 (CLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2015 PLP 910 (CLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2015 PLP 910 (CLD) (NATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED — Appellant Versus SHAHID NASEEM, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SPECIALIZED COMPANIES DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rashid Sadiq, Advocate and Asif Mumtaz Mian, Company Secretary for Appellant.
- Noman Akhtar, Joint Director (SCD) and Asif Paryani, Deputy Director (SCD) for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 33
Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Ss.282J(1), 282J(2), 282-D, 282M(1)
Non-Banking Finance Companies (Establishment and Regulation) Rules, 2003, Rr.5 & 7(3)
NE Regulations, 2008, Regln.4
Cancellation of Licence to undertake Asset Management Service for contravention of Rules and Regulations
Company remained persistently non-compliant of Rules and Regulations despite numerous commitments and assurances towards ensuring compliance
Company had made a number of commitments to raise its equity and size
Company was given a number of opportunities to make up the shortfall, but each time failed to adhere to its firm commitment
Company's licence to undertake Asset Management Services was suspended, but other licence to undertake Investment Advisory Services, remained intact
Since the Directors of the company did not comply with the Rules and Regulations; and continued to operate without compliance to the minimum required equity; and minimum required fund; a penalty of Rs.50,000 was imposed on each of its Directors as well as its ex-Directors
Representative of the company, contended that for the conversion of closed end fund to its open end fund, which was pending approval of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan; if approved, would enhance the equity to the level of minimum equity requirement and that requirement would be met by specified date
Judgment & Decree
This order is in Appeal No 15 of 2014 filed under section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (the "Commission") Act, 1997 against the order dated 30/05/14 (the "Impugned Order") passed by the Respondent.
2. The brief facts of the case are that Messrs National Asset Management Company Limited ("NAMCO") is a Non-Banking Finance Company incorporated in Pakistan as public unlisted company in the year 2005 under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 (the "Ordinance"). NAMCO was licensed by the Commission to undertake the businesses of asset management and investment advisory services under the Non-Banking Finance Companies (Establishment and Regulation) Rules, 2003 (NBFC Rules, 2003) and Notified Entities Regulations, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the "NBFCs and NE Regulations, 2008"). Show Cause Notice ("SCN") dated -1/11/14 was served under section 282J(1) and section 282J(2) reads with section 282D and section 282M(1) of the Ordinance for contravention of Rule 7(3) of NBFC Rules 2003 read with regulation 4 of the NBFCs and NEs Regulations, 2008. Hearings in the matter were held on 18-12-2013 and 21-3-2014.
3. The Respondent dissatisfied with the response of the Appellant held that NAMCO remained persistently non-complaint, inspite of numerous commitments and assurances towards ensuring compliance. NAMCO had made a number of commitments to raise its equity and to raise the NIF size and were given a number of opportunities to make up the shortfall but each time NAMCO failed to adhere to its firm commitment. In exercise of the powers of the Commission conferred under section 282J(2) of the Ordinance, NAMCO's license to undertake Asset Management Services issued under Rule 5 of NBFC Rules, 2003 was suspended with immediate effect. However, NAMCO's other license to undertake Investment Advisory Services shall remain intact. Further, since the directors of NAMCO did not comply with the NBFCs aforesaid Rule and the regulations and continued to operate without compliance to the minimum required equity and minimum required fund of NIF, a penalty of Rs. 50,000 was imposed on each of its current directors namely. Lt. Gen. (Retd.) M. Hamid Khan, Mr, Saleem Shahzada, M. Imtiaz Bashir and Mr. M. Asim Mustafa as well as ex-directors namely Mr. Shafiq A. Khan and Hafiz Awais Ghani, Furthermore, the trustee of both NBF and NIF i.e. MCB FSL are directed to take both the collective investment schemes i.e. NBF and NIF under its effective control on immediate bases and arrange to transfer their management rights to another Asset Management Company which best serves the interest of the unit/certificate holders.
4. The Appellant has preferred the appeal against the Impugned Order, The Appellant's representative argued that for the conversion of closed end fund to its open end fund which is pending approval of the SECP if approved would enhance the equity to the level of minimum equity requirement and this requirement will be met by 30-6-2014.
5. The department has accepted the request of the Appellant to give them time until 30/06/14 to comply with the aforesaid requirement. In view of the foregoing, we suspend the Impugned Order until the next date of hearing to be fixed after 30-6-2014. HBT/14/SEC Order accordingly.