2016 PLP 69 (CLCN)
BABY RAMMA KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD KHURRAM KHAN and 5 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2016 PLP 69 (CLCN) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BABY RAMMA KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD KHURRAM KHAN and 5 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2016 PLP 69 (CLCN)?
This judgment primarily cites: Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2016 PLP 69 (CLCN)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2016 PLP 69 (CLCN) (BABY RAMMA KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD KHURRAM KHAN and 5 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Akbar for Petitioner.
- Ms. Rakhshanda Waheed, State Counsel for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 25
Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Matter with regard to custody of minor was already pending before the competent court of jurisdiction
Parties to seek custody of minor from the concerned Guardian Court
Minor daughter showed her willingness to go along with her mother she was permitted to go with her
Minor was directed to be produced before the Guardian Court on the next date of hearing who should regulate interim and permanent custody of the same keeping in view the welfare of minor as prime consideration
Minor was allowed to join her mother only till the next date fixed by the Guardian Court
Said order would cease to have effect on such date whereafter either earlier order of Guardian Court would stand revived or her custody might be regulated through some subsequent order if passed by the Guardian Court
Respondents who were brothers of minor would be at liberty to join proceedings before the Guardian Court and might defend the custody of their minor sister
No harassment should be caused to any of the party and legal remedy should be availed to secure the ends of justice
Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. [Paras. 2 & 3 of the Judgment]
Judgment & Decree
AQEEL AHMED ABBASI, J.
Pursuant to Court notices, Munib Ahmed Khan and Ammar Ahmed Khan, respondents Nos.2 and 3 have shown appearance and have denied the allegations as contained in the instant petition and submit that pursuant to a compromise order passed by the learned Guardian and Wards Court, the petitioner i.e. Baby Ramma Khan, who is their real sister, has been residing happily with them and respondent No.1 since her childhood, whereas, the allegations of harassment by them as referred to hereinabove are totally false and frivolous. It has been further contended that Mst. Lubna Hussain, who contracted second marriage with one Mazhar Hussain, has reportedly filed a Guardian and Ward Case No.1082/2014 before the learned IInd Civil and Family Judge at Karachi (Central) by impleading only respondent No.1 as a party, whereas, they have not been impleaded as party with mala fide intention. It has been further stated that Baby Ramma Khan was taken from their house by Mst. Lubna Hussain without their consent and thereafter, instant frivolous petition has been filed to obtain order of the custody of their minor sister, who is living with them since her birth for the last about 11 years. When inquired from Baby Ramma Khan regarding above facts as stated by respondents Nos.2 and 3, she did not deny such facts, however, submitted that she is studying in Class-VI and wants to go with her real mother i.e. Lubna Hussain present in Court, as according to her, her stepmother, namely, Nehar Jahangir does not treat her properly. Since the matter regarding custody of Baby Ramma Khan is already pending before the competent Court of jurisdiction, therefore, it will be appropriate for the parties to seek the custody of the minor from the concerned Guardian and Ward Court in the above proceedings. However, since Baby Ramma Khan has shown her willingness to go along with her real mother, therefore, as an interim arrangement, she is permitted to go with her real mother. However, petitioner Baby Ramma Khan shall be produced before the G & W Court on the next date of hearing, who shall regulate the interim and permanent custody of minor baby in accordance with law, through speaking order, however, keeping in view the welfare of the minor as prime consideration. It is clarified that through instant order, this Court has merely allowed the petitioner Baby Ramma Khan to join her mother only till the next date fixed by the learned Guardian and Ward Court in the above G & W case, and shall have no bearing, whatsoever, on the merits of such case, and the said order shall cease to have effect on such date, whereafter, either the earlier order of G & W Court would stand revived or her custody may be regulated through some subsequent order, if passed, by the Guardian and Wards Court in above case on such date. The respondents, who are real brothers of petitioner Baby Ramma Khan are at liberty to join the above proceedings before the G & W Court in the above case, and may defend the custody of their minor sister in accordance with law. Parties shall ensure that no harassmanet may be caused to each other, whereas, legal remedy shall be availed to secure the end of justice. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms along with listed application. ZC/B-17/Sindh Order accordingly.