2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
NASIR ALI Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and 4 others
| Citation | 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh High Court (Larkana Bench) |
| Bench Members | Zafar Ahmed Rajput and Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, JJ |
| Parties | NASIR ALI Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and 4 others |
| Primary Law | Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh High Court (Larkana Bench) bench comprising: Zafar Ahmed Rajput and Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (NASIR ALI Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and 4 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muzafar Ali Wadhio for Petitioner.
- Liaqaut Ali Shar, Additional Advocate General for Respondents.
- 3. Mr. Liaquat Ali Shar, learned Additional Advocate General, initially resisted this petition on the premise that the petitioner did not apply in time for the subject post, as such his case could not be considered for appointment, however, we confronted the legal position of the case to him; and, several cases, decided by this Court on the subject issue, he in principle agreed for disposal of this petition accordingly. However, he submitted that the case of the petitioner for appointment on quota reserved for deceased employees may be referred to the competent authority of the Government of Sindh for consideration in the light of Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974, subject to the exception made therein.
Headnotes / Summary
Rr. 10-A & 11-A
Deceased quota
Legal heir of tender age at the time of death of government servant
Son of the deceased government servant (who served at Revenue Department, Government of Sindh) invoked constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court for his appointment under family quto
Record revealed that the father of the petitioner was Naib Qasid of the office of Deputy Commissioner, who passed away during service
At the time of death of the father of the petitioner, he was under-age and due to his tender age, he could not obtain Computerized National Identification Card and other supporting documents
However, the petitioner attained the age of majority after about nine and half years of death of his father, and he applied for his appointment against the deceased quota after four months (of attaining majority)
Said factor was duly endorsed by contents of a letter of the concerned Additional Deputy Commissioner addressed to the concerned Assistant Secretary, Board of Revenue Sindh
High Court directed respondent (the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh) for scrutiny and consideration and to pass decision through a speaking order on the application for appointment that shall be submitted by the petitioner
Constitutional petition, filed by the son of deceased government servant, was disposed of accordingly. C.Ps. Nos.482-K and 403-K of 2016 ref.
Judgment & Decree
ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J.
Through this constitutional petition under Article 199 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973, the petitioner seeks directions to the competent authority of respondent-Revenue Department Government of Sindh for his appointment to some post in Revenue Department in terms of Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974.
2. Mr. Muzafar Ali Wadhio learned Counsel for the petitioner, has argued that the petitioners' father passed away during service in the year 2009; that upon his death, he filed an application before the competent authority of Revenue Department within time as prescribed by the law; and, since then no decision has been taken by the respondent-department for his appointment on deceased quota on a suitable post as per his qualification and eligibility. In support of his contention, he heavily relied upon Rule 10-A and Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974, and argued that the petitioner is entitled to be considered for any suitable post under the law.
3. Mr. Liaquat Ali Shar, learned Additional Advocate General, initially resisted this petition on the premise that the petitioner did not apply in time for the subject post, as such his case could not be considered for appointment, however, we confronted the legal position of the case to him; and, several cases, decided by this Court on the subject issue, he in principle agreed for disposal of this petition accordingly. However, he submitted that the case of the petitioner for appointment on quota reserved for deceased employees may be referred to the competent authority of the Government of Sindh for consideration in the light of Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974, subject to the exception made therein.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties on the aforesaid issue and perused the material available on record as well as decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court on the subject issue.
5. We have noticed that the father of the petitioner, namely, Abdul Majeed Zangejo, Ex-Naib Qasid of the office of Deputy Commissioner Larkana, passed away on 26.7.2009, during service. At the time of the death of the father of the petitioner, he was underage and due to tender age, he couldn't obtain CNIC and other supporting documents. However, on attaining the age of majority i.e. (18) years on 06.02.2019, the petitioner applied for his appointment against deceased-quota on 19.06.2019. The aforesaid factum was duly endorsed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner Larkana vide letter dated 11.2.2020 addressed to Assistant Secretary, Board of Revenue Sindh, Hyderabad available on record. The learned Addl. A.G. endorsed the aforesaid factual position of the case and referred the order dated 07.11.2019 passed by this Court in C.P. No. D-3218 of 2017 and other connected petitions, whereby this Court disposed of the petitions in the light of judgment passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in C.Ps. Nos. 482-K and 403-K of 2016 vide Order dated 10.08.2016 and directed the competent authority to scrutinize and consider the cases of petitioners (therein) under the law and the prescribed rules, procedure, and policy. The aforesaid decision of this Court was assailed before the Honorable Supreme Court in Civil Petitions Nos. 739-K and 740-K of 2019, whereby the Honorable Supreme Court vide Order dated 16.7.2021 was pleased to dismiss the petition(s) by maintaining the judgment passed by this Court. Primarily, the case of the petitioner is akin to the cases decided by this Court as discussed supra. An excerpt of the order dated 16.7.2021 passed by the Honorable Supreme Court is reproduced as under: "Heard the petitioners in person and perused the record. No case is made out for our interfering with the impugned judgment. The petitions are dismissed." Prima-facie, the plea of learned A.A.G. is tenable in the light of the latest verdict of Honorable Supreme Court as discussed supra.
6. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of in the terms that Petitioner shall submit his application along with supporting material/documents to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, through any recognized courier service on or before 16.08.2021, for scrutiny and consideration and decision through a speaking order on or before 23.08.2021 strictly under the law and the prescribed rules, procedure and policy, and after providing the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Offer letter shall be issued to the petitioner if his case for appointment on deceased quota is approved by the Chief Secretary/competent authority where after petitioner shall complete all legal and codal formalities required under the law and the relevant rule, procedure, and policy.
7. The compliance report in the above terms shall be filed by the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, through learned A.A.G. with the Additional Registrar of this Court.
8. Office is directed to send copy of this Order to the Chief Secretary Sindh and Senior Member Board of Revenue, Government of Sindh for its compliance in letter and spirit.
9. By consent, this petition is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. MQ/N-15/Sindh Order accordingly.