PCRLJ 2003

2003 P Cr (PLP)

Mst. SHER BANO — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2002-August-19
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2003 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties Mst. SHER BANO — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others — Respondents
Primary Law (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 P Cr (PLP) (Mst. SHER BANO — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Nemo for Petitioner.
  • Learned Additional Advocate-General, Sindh present in Court submits that Noman alias Nomi is accused in Crime No.441 of 2001, Police Station. Korangi, for offence punishable under section 302, P.P.C. and sufficient material is available with the prosecution to connect him with the commission of this crime, but by misstatement made before the Court he was got released on bail. He supports the application moved by the complainant.
  • We have heard learned counsel for the complainant and perused the case record which reveals that on 21-12-2001, Mr. Abbas Ali, learned Additional Advocate-General, Sindh had stated before this Court as under:
  • "The Additional S.H.O. of Police Station Korangi has informed him that till today there is no material with him to show any involvement of the detenu in F.I.R. No.441 of 2001. On the basis of above statement given by the Additional S.H.O., of Police Station Korangi learned Additional Advocate-General concedes for passing of an order for release of the detenu on bail. "
  • As according to Mr. Sarwar Khan, learned Additional Advocate -General, Sindh there is sufficient material available with the prosecution to connect the accused Noman alias Nomi, with the commission of Crime No.441 of 2001, Police Station Korangi, we deem it fit and proper to modify the order dated 21-12-2001 in the following terms:--
  • At this stage Syed Sarfraz Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner has appeared in Court and stated that listed application, being an application under section 12(2), C.P.C. is not maintainable in law. We are not impressed by this submission of the learned counsel for the reason that listed application is not an application moved only under section 12(2), C.P.C: but many other provisions of law have also been applied. Besides it is the substance of the application rather than its form which is material for deciding its fate.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497(5)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302

Bail, cancellation of

Order granting bail to the accused had been sought to be recalled on ground that order had been obtained by suppression and misstatement of material facts

Prosecution stated that sufficient material was available with the prosecution to connect the accused with commission of crime-- Order granting bail was modified to the effect that bail granted to the accused would be considered as protective bail to the accused up to the specified date where-after it would cease to have force and in the meantime accused could approach the Trial Court for grant of bail

If an application for grant of bail was moved before Trial Court, the same would be decided strictly on merits.

Art. 199

Jurisdiction of High Court

Scope

Jurisdiction of High Court-under Art.199 of the Constitution could not be exercised in aid of injustice or to distract some proceedings pending before a Court of law.

Judgment & Decree

ANWAR ZAHIR JAMALI, J.

Through listed application under section 12(2), section 151, C.P.C. read with section 21 of the General Clauses Act, sections 497(5), 561-A and 369, Cr.P.C. the complainant has approached this Court with the prayer that the order dated 21-12-2001, passed in this petition, whereby son of the petitioner namely Noman alias Nomi involved in Crime No.441 of 2001, Police Station Korangi was admitted to bail on furnishing of surety in the sum of Rs.50,000, may be recalled as such order was obtained from this Court by suppression and misstatement of material facts. Learned Additional Advocate-General, Sindh present in Court submits that Noman alias Nomi is accused in Crime No.441 of 2001, Police Station. Korangi, for offence punishable under section 302, P.P.C. and sufficient material is available with the prosecution to connect him with the commission of this crime, but by misstatement made before the Court he was got released on bail. He supports the application moved by the complainant. We have heard learned counsel for the complainant and perused the case record which reveals that on 21-12-2001, Mr. Abbas Ali, learned Additional Advocate-General, Sindh had stated before this Court as under: "The Additional S.H.O. of Police Station Korangi has informed him that till today there is no material with him to show any involvement of the detenu in F.I.R. No.441 of 2001. On the basis of above statement given by the Additional S.H.O., of Police Station Korangi learned Additional Advocate-General concedes for passing of an order for release of the detenu on bail. " It was on the basis of above statement that accused Noman son of Nizamuddin was ordered to be released on bail. As according to Mr. Sarwar Khan, learned Additional Advocate -General, Sindh there is sufficient material available with the prosecution to connect the accused Noman alias Nomi, with the commission of Crime No.441 of 2001, Police Station Korangi, we deem it fit and proper to modify the order dated 21-12-2001 in the following terms:-- Ball granted to the accused Noman alias Nomi son of Nizamuddin in Crime No.441 of 2001, Police Station Korangi vide order dated 21-12-2001, shall be considered as protective bail to the accused up to 26-8-2002, where-after it shall cease to have force. In the meantime accused Noman son of Nizamuddin, if he so chooses, may approach the trial Court for grant of bail. In case such application is moved before the trial Court, same shall be decided strictly on merits without being influenced by any order passed in this petition. In case accused Noman son of Nizamuddin fails to appear and surrender before the trial Court within the aforesaid period, surety furnished by him before this Court shall stand forfeited and the trial Court will be free to take appropriate action against him in accordance with law. At this stage Syed Sarfraz Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner has appeared in Court and stated that listed application, being an application under section 12(2), C.P.C. is not maintainable in law. We are not impressed by this submission of the learned counsel for the reason that listed application is not an application moved only under section 12(2), C.P.C: but many other provisions of law have also been applied. Besides it is the substance of the application rather than its form which is material for deciding its fate. Before parting with this order we may further observe that jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution cannot be exercised in aid of injustice or to distract some proceedings pending before Court of law. Once it has come on record that Noman alias Nomi son of the petitioner is accused in Crime No.441 of 2001, Police Station Korangi he has to face the proceedings before the trial Court. H.B.T./S-271/K Order accordingly.