2020 PLP 1248 (SCMR)
Mufti KAFAYAT ULLAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2020 PLP 1248 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Umar Ata Bandial, Faisal Arab and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ |
| Parties | Mufti KAFAYAT ULLAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2020 PLP 1248 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2020 PLP 1248 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Umar Ata Bandial, Faisal Arab and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2020 PLP 1248 (SCMR) (Mufti KAFAYAT ULLAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mir Afzal Malik, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Niazullah Niazi, Advocate-General, Islamabad with M. Anwar, I.O., Margallah for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against judgment dated 17.03.2020 passed by the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad in Criminal Revision No. 20 of 2019)
S. 324
Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 40
Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd
Complainant alleged that after hearing of a case in the district court, the accused and his co-accused brother confronted the complainant party in the parking lot and attempted two fire shots, but both of them luckily got stuck in the chamber of the weapon
Subsequently the accused was allegedly subdued and disarmed in the parking lot by a police officer
Such story of unusual failure of the assault rested upon word of mouth of complainant and witnesses with inherent missing links
Investigating Officer who recorded the crime report at the spot did not secure missed bullets from the weapon nor he associated the police official, who allegedly intervened to snatch the gun and subdued the accused
Said police official was also absent from the witness-box
Inclusion of accused's brother in the case for having common intention with the accused cast doubt on the prosecution case
According to notes of police proceedings, the complainant with her brother presented the weapon belonging to the accused to the police with five live bullets in the magazine
Such seizure did not qualify the riders of Art. 40 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 so as to be received as corroboration of the prosecution story that otherwise ran counter to the case set up in the crime report
Given the persistent animosity between the parties, it would be unsafe to maintain the conviction on the basis of a prosecution script, which was inherently flawed
Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and allowed, and impugned judgments were set aside and the accused was acquitted of the charge. Niazullah Niazi, Advocate-General, Islamabad with M. Anwar, I.O., Margallah for the State.
Judgment & Decree
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.
Mufti Kafayat Ullah, petitioner, was tried by a Magistrate at Islamabad for murderous assault on his estranged wife Mst. Sabiha (PW-1) as well as brother-in-law Abdul Majeed (PW-2) in District Court premises on 8.2.2013 where they confronted him after proceedings before a Family Judge. It is alleged that soon after the adjournment of proceedings in a suit filed by the complainant seeking dissolution of her marriage, the petitioner confronted them in the parking lot and attempted repeated fire shots, both luckily stuck in the chamber; the witnesses with the assistance of a police official on duty snatched the gun while he took to the heels, shadowed by his brother Shafiullah. Vide judgment dated 17.12.2018, the learned Magistrate returned a guilty verdict; convicted under section 324 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860, he was sentenced to six months' RI with a fine of Rs.5000/- or to undergo one month's SI in default thereof, pre-trial period inclusive. Learned Sessions Judge (West) Islamabad vide judgment dated 27.2.2019 dismissed the appeal; recourse to the High Court met with no better fate vide judgment dated 17.3.2020, vires whereof, are being assailed on a variety of grounds ranging from a cooked up accusation by inimical witnesses to an inherently self-destructive charge, clamouring for interference by this Court. The motion is contested by the learned Law Officer on the ground of unanimity of finding of guilt by the three tribunals.
2. Heard. Record perused.
3. Going by complainant's narrative, the petitioner twice attempted fire shots and a miracle shielded the family and it was during this process that the petitioner was subdued and disarmed with the assistance of an unnamed police officer. Story of unusual failure of an assault, allegedly pre-concerted, is resting upon word of mouth alone with inherent missing links; the Investigating Officer who recorded crime report at the spot did not secure missed bullets therefrom nor he associated the police official, who according to the witnesses while being in the line of duty, intervened to snatch the gun; he is conspicuous by his absence both at the spot as well as witness-box. Inclusion of petitioner's brother Shafiullah in the array for being in the community of intention evinces desires oblique and suspect with inevitable reflections in the retrospect. According to note of police proceedings, the complainant with her brother Abdul Majeed, upon arrival of Fakhar Abbas ASI (PW-3) presented a .30 caliber pistol with five live bullets in the magazine; seizure does not qualify the riders of Article 40 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 so as to be received as corroboration of a story that otherwise runs counter to the case set up in the crime report. Given the persisting animosity, it would be unsafe to maintain the conviction on the basis of a script, inherently flawed. Petition is converted into appeal and allowed; impugned judgments are set aside and the appellant is acquitted of the charge. These are the reasons of our short order of even date, reproduced below: "For reasons to follow, this petition is converted into appeal and allowed; conviction and sentence recorded by the learned trial Court, affirmed by the Appellate Court and the High Court are set aside. The appellant shall be released forthwith if not required to be detained in any other case." MWA/K-5/SC Petition allowed.