P L D 1988 Peshawar 11 (PLP)
HAZRAT MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 4 others — Respondents
| Citation | P L D 1988 Peshawar 11 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Sardar Fakhre Alam and Abdul Karim Khan Kundi, JJ |
| Parties | HAZRAT MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 4 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1988 Peshawar 11 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1988 Peshawar 11 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Sardar Fakhre Alam and Abdul Karim Khan Kundi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1988 Peshawar 11 (PLP) (HAZRAT MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 4 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mohammad Aman for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 15thSeptember, 1987
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(1), third proviso--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.199 247--Cancellation of bail--Bail granted to accused by Assistant Commissioner under third proviso to subsection (1) of 5.497, Cr.P.C. since they had remained in jail for more than two years--Bail cancelled by Additional Commissioner as also by Additional Secretary Home on ground that third proviso to subsection (1) to S.497, Cr. P.C. under which bail was granted was added by Ordinance LXXI of 1979 which was not made applicable by Governor of N.-W.F.P. to Provincially Administered Tribal Area with approval of President in term of Art. 247 of Constitution and unamended Cr.P.C. still holding field there-Orders of cancellation of bail upheld, on said grounds. 1984 P C r. L J 411 rel.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL KARIM KUNDI, J.
Hazrat Mohammad and Guli-ur- Rehman, the writ petitioners charged under section 302/34, PPC were released on bail by the Court of Asstt. Commissioner Timergara, District Dir under the third proviso to subsection (1) of section 497, Cr.P.C. since they had been detained for the offence for a continuous period exceeding two years and their trial for the offence has not concluded. Their bails were cancelled by the learned Additional Commissioner, Malakand Division, the appellate forum with reference to an authority of the Baluchistan High Court published in 1984 P Cr.L J 411, holding that the third proviso to subsection (I) of section 497 added by Code of Criminal Procedure (Second Amendment) Ordinance LXXI of 1979 was not applicable to Tribal Areas unless orders in -terms of Article 247 of the Constitution were made in this behalf. The aforesaid orders of the Additional Commissioner were further confirmed by the Additional Secretary Home and Tribal Affairs in revision. The petitioners have challenged the orders of the Addl. Commissioner and Additional Secretary vis-a-vis the cancellation of their bail contending that the authority of the Baluchistan High Court was not applicable in case of the Provincially Administered Tribal Area of NWFP and that since the Code of Criminal Procedure was applied to PATA, any amendment in the Code will also be ipso facto applicable to PATA.
2. After hearing Mr. Mohammad Aman Khan, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners at some-length we confronted him with Article 247(3) of the Constitution reading that . . . . . . . . . .no Act of Parliament or a Provincial Assembly shall apply to a Provincially Administered Tribal Area or to any part thereof unless the Governor of the Province in which the Tribal Area is situate with the approval of the President so directs. . . . . . . . . . . ." Clause (4) of the Article was read as that the President may with respect to any matter within the legislative competence of the Parliament and the Governor of a Province with the prior approval of the President may with respect to any matter within the legislative competent of the Provincial Assembly make Regulation for the peace and good Govt. of a Provincially Admintered Tribal Area of any part thereof situated in the Province. In view thereof it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners, that there is to be made independent legislation through regulation by the President in case of PATA in respect of matters within the legislative competence of a Parliament or the Governor of a Province to make Regulation for PATA or part thereof situate in his Province in respect of matters within the legislative competence of the Provincial Assembly. As for act of a Parliament is concerned including the amending Act or Ordinance, the same shall be applied independently to PATA by the Governor of the Province in which the tribal area is situate with the approval of 'the President. Since the Code of Criminal Procedure (Second Amendment) Ordinance LXXI of 1979, an act of the Parliament has not been applied by the Governor of NWFP to PATA with the approval of the President, as such, the said law effecting amendment in section 497(1), Cr.P.C. shall not apply to the PATH of the Province and the unamended Code of Criminal Procedure still holds the field.
3. That being the legal-position we do not find any merit' in this) writ petition and accordingly order its dismissal in limine. Civil Misc. for interim bail ipso facto is also dismissed. M.Y.H/562/P Petition dismissed.