PLD 2022

P L D 2022 Sindh 308 (PLP)

BAKAULLAH KHAN SAMOO — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Department and 9 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
2020-August-28
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 2022 Sindh 308 (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties BAKAULLAH KHAN SAMOO — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Department and 9 others — Respondents
Primary Law (a) Constitution of Pakistan, (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 2022 Sindh 308 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: (a) Constitution of Pakistan, (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 2022 Sindh 308 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 2022 Sindh 308 (PLP) (BAKAULLAH KHAN SAMOO — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Department and 9 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Ashar Majeed Khokhar for Petitioner.
  • Gulzar Ali Almani for Respondents Nos. 7 and 10.
  • Wali Muhammad Jamari, Assistant Advocate General.

Headnotes / Summary

Art.199

Habeas corpus

Power under Art.199 of the Constitution

Scope

Missing person

Scope

Habeas corpus writ is to be issued only when the person concerning whose liberty, the petition has been filed, is illegally detained by respondents in the petition

On the basis of a habeas corpus petition the power under Art. 199 of the Constitution is not to be exercised for tracing a missing person engaging an investigation agency empowered to investigate a case under the Code of Criminal Procedure

Investigation, if is in progress, is to be overseen by the criminal court.

S. 154

Information in cognizable cases

Missing person report

Scope

When missing report is made, the police officials enter only a Daily Diary Report and not an FIR

Such practice is deprecated by the High Court as such procedure is not correct and justified

Whenever any report is made regarding missing of any individual, immediately an FIR should be registered.

Judgment & Decree

ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J.

Petitioner through instant petition has prayed for issuance of directions to the concerned police officials to recover detainee Abdul Waheed alias Wanhial from the illegal confinement of private respondents. He has also prayed for issuance of directions to the concerned police officials not to register new case against the Petitioner, abductee/detainee and his family on the instigation of private respondents.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the police have not taken any step for tracking down the missing person namely Abdul Waheed alias Wanhial. Hence this court should issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the police to trace, recover and produce the missing person; he further prays for holding an independent inquiry in respect of alleged state of affairs as discussed supra.

3. I asked learned counsel as to how this petition is maintainable on the premise that the petitioner has recourse under the law. He replied, while giving brief history of the case and argued that detainee Abdul Waheed alias Wanhial contracted valid marriage with Respondent No.7 and after his marriage, his whereabouts are unknown, leaving his brother to move an application to Additional I.G. Police Hyderabad Range for tracking his whereabouts. He next added that Respondent No.7, who is legally wedded wife of Abdul Waheed alleged detainee as discussed supra, filed Cr. Misc. Application No. 511 of 2020 under Sections 22-A and 22-B, Cr.P.C. before the competent court of law with the assertion that alleged detainee had kidnapped her, raped her and made her objectionable videos, such FIR of the incident was registered with concerned police station and is under investigation. He further pointed out that subsequently, Respondent No. 10, who is mother of Mst. Fareeda/Respondent No.7 also filed another Cr. Misc. Application No. 542 of 2020 under Sections 22-A and 22-B, Cr.P.C., before the competent court of law, for registration of another FIR against Abdul Waheed and others on the plea that her another daughter namely Majida had been kidnapped by alleged detainee and others; such FIR of the incident was also registered with concerned police station. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted the since petitioner's nephew namely Abdul Waheed went missing, therefore he has approached this court.

4. During the course of arguments I have been informed that one FIR of the alleged incident as discussed supra has already been disposed of under C-Class, but no final order has been passed by learned trial court on the summary proceedings.

5. In our view, a habeas corpus writ is to be issued only when the person concerning whose liberty, the petition has been filed, is illegally detained by respondents in the petition. On the basis of a habeas corpus petition the power under Article 199 of the Constitution is not to be exercised for tracing a missing person engaging an investigating agency empowered to investigate a case under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The investigation, if is in progress, is to be overseen by the criminal court. Here the petitioner is asking this court to direct the police to track down his missing nephew against whom a criminal case is registered for which learned Trial Court has to take decision yet and interference at this stage is not called for, however, it is the usual practice as and when missing report is made, the police officials enter only a Daily Diary Report and not an FIR as has been done in the present case. This practice has been deprecated by this Court in various orders passed from time to time observing that such a procedure is not correct and justified.

6. Under the circumstances, we direct the official respondents that as and when any report is made regarding missing of any individual, immediately an FIR should be registered. They are required to monitor the entire process of tracing out the missing individuals so that criminals may not escape with the person.

7. In view of the forgoing, the above writ petition stand disposed of with the aforesaid directions. In the meantime official Respondents to cooperate with the petitioner and locate the whereabouts of his nephew namely Abdul Waheed alias Wanhial and if he provides concrete evidence against anyone regarding his detention, the police official shall act strictly promptly in accordance therewith. SA/B-2/Sindh Order accordingly.