2021 PLP 758 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2021 PLP 758 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Mushir Alam, Yahya Afridi and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 PLP 758 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 PLP 758 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mushir Alam, Yahya Afridi and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 PLP 758 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zahoor Ahmed Chishti, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment dated 19.06.2017 passed by the Balochistan High Court, Quetta in Criminal Appeal No.337/2016)
Ss. 302(b) & 449
Qatl-i-amd, house-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with death
Witnesses who furnished the ocular account were all related to the deceased and were residents of the locality
Said witnesses unanimously pointed their fingers upon the accused
Hypothesis of a mistaken identity in the month of June during early dawn was beside the mark
Given the location of police station at a distance of 30/32 kilometers from the place of occurrence in an area with primitive means of communication, the delay in reporting the matter to the police could not be viewed with suspicion
Statements of witnesses were in unison with each other, and confirmed an ongoing dispute between the deceased and one of the absconding co-accused
Witnesses being inmates of the premises, themselves had no axe to grind against the accused nor were expected to swap the actual offender with an innocent person, as there was nothing on the record to even obliquely entertain any theory of substitution
Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and convictions and sentences recorded against the accused under Ss. 302 & 449, P.P.C. were maintained. Wallayat Hussain, Additional Prosecutor General Balochistan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.
Mehboob Ali, 35, was shot dead during the wee hours of 21.6.2015, while asleep as a guest in the house of his brother Abdul Karim (PW-5), located within the precincts of Police Station Levies Dashat, Mastung. Incident was reported by his sister Zarnaz (PW-1), a resident in the neighbourhood; she accused the petitioner alongside Dur Khan, Qadir Bukhsh, Badal Khan, Haji Khan and Muhammad Yousaf, away from the law till date, for the murder in the backdrop of a previous dispute. Spot inspection includes seizure of blood as well as 18 casings of Kalashnikov. Autopsy report confirmed multiple entrance wounds on the forehead with corresponding exits, cumulatively leading to the death. The petitioner was alone to contest indictment before the learned Sessions Judge Mastung; vide judgment dated 08.10.2016 he was convicted under sections 302, 449 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to imprisonment for life and seven years' RI, respectively, with a direction to pay compensation as well as fine, upheld by the High Court of Balochistan vide impugned judgment dated 19.06.2017, albeit with a direction for concurrent commutation of sentences, pretrial period inclusive.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the deceased was done to death under mysterious circumstances in an unseen occurrence, noticed subsequently and reported through the witnesses, stage-managed after consultations; that despite his having endured the period of physical remand, no recovery was effected from the petitioner, a circumstance in itself, vindicating his position. Occurrence being a night affair, reported after inordinate delay, the question of assailants' identity is looming large on the scene, concluded the learned counsel. The learned Law Officer has faithfully defended the impugned judgment.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. The prosecution has primarily relied upon ocular account furnished by Mst. Naz Malik (PW-3), Abdul Fatah (PW-4) and Abdul Karim (PW-5); the last is real brother of the deceased whom he visited during the fateful night in the month of Ramzan; Mst. Naz Malik is a niece, wife of Abdul Fatah (PW-4), residents of the locality; all of them unanimously pointed their fingers upon the petitioner, accompanied by the absconding co-accused who took on the deceased shortly after close of Sehar. In this backdrop, the hypothesis of a mistaken identity in the month of June with early dawn is beside the mark. Given the location of police station at a distance of 30/32 kilometers from the place of occurrence in the province of Balochistan with primitive means of communication, report straight at the police station cannot be viewed with suspicion. With assistance of learned counsel, we have gone through the statements of witnesses to find them in a confidence inspiring unison; inconsequential cross-examination mostly comprising of bald suggestions, each vehemently denied, fails to reflect upon the credibility of witnesses; on the contrary, confirms an ongoing dispute between the deceased and Dur Khan, one of the accused still absconding. The witnesses being inmate of the premises, themselves have no axe to grind against the accused nor are expected to swap the actual offender with the innocent, as there is nothing on the record to even obliquely entertain any theory of substitution; they have rightly been held as worthy of credence; reliance upon their testimonies by the Courts below being in accord with the principles of safe administration of criminal justice calls for no interference. Petition fails. Leave declined. MWA/M-20/SC Petition dismissed.