1990 PLP 1201 (SCMR)
REFIQUE SAIGAL‑‑Appellant Versus P.I.A. and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1201 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | S. Usman Ali Shah, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry and Ajmal Mian, JJ |
| Parties | REFIQUE SAIGAL‑‑Appellant Versus P.I.A. and others‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1201 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1201 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: S. Usman Ali Shah, Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry and Ajmal Mian, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1201 (SCMR) (REFIQUE SAIGAL‑‑Appellant Versus P.I.A. and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- ‑‑‑S.409/420/109‑‑‑Rcvicw‑‑‑Supreme Court proceeding ex parte set aside order of High Court and directed District Magistrate to issue fresh notice under S.202, Cr.P.C. to accused and others‑‑‑Accused sought review of the said order on the ground of having no knowledge of date of hearing‑‑‑Accused failed to explain as to whether after filing power of attorney when he was told about date of hearing, he tried to intimate through telephone or telegram to Supreme Court requesting for adjournment or likewise‑‑‑Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.‑‑‑(Review).
- Raja Muhammad Akram, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Siddidui, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Appellant.
- M. Bilal, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz M. Khan, Advocate‑on -Record for Respondents No.1.
- Date of hearing: 20th December, 1989.
- The appellant submitted an application for review to the effect that they have no knowledge for the case fixed for 15‑12‑1980 and according to the learned counsel it was on the said date i.e.15‑12‑1980 that he became aware at Karachi through Mr. Noori Advocate‑on‑Record of P.I.A.C. and was told by the said A.O.R. that the case has‑been heard in Peshawar on the same date.
- The learned counsel for the appellant before us reiterated the same arguments that on 15‑12‑1980 he was arguing a case at Karachi when he was made aware there at Karachi by Mr. Noori AOR of the case fixed for hearing of the appeal by this Court at Peshawar. On the other side Mr Bilal learned counsel for the respondent No.1 questioned the maintainability of this appeal and referred us to a power of attorney of the Advocate‑on‑Record i.e. a green sheet on page 32 of the file alongwith an‑application of enter appearance. The power of attorney bears a note of this Court dated 15‑12‑1980 with the following words:‑
- "This appeal is fixed for hearing before the Court at Peshawar today the 15‑12‑1980. Mr. M. A. Siddiqui, Advocate‑on‑Record has been informed of this position which was noted by Mr. MA. Siddiqui on the same date i.e. 15‑12‑1980."
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 15‑12‑1980 in Criminal Appeal No.l6‑P of 1973). Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑ Nemo for the Remaining Respondents
Judgment & Decree
Nemo for the Remaining Respondents Date of hearing: 20th December, 1989. S. USMAN ALI SHAH, J‑‑‑This appeal by leave of the Court in criminal Review Petition No.2‑R of 1981 is directed against the order of this Court dated 15‑12‑1980. whereby Criminal appeal No.16‑P of 1973 of the respondents against the order of the. Peshawar High Court dated 16‑2‑1971, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.37 of 1969, was allowed in their favour. The appellant with the 5 respondents were directors of the Company known as Messrs Khyber Express Limited and was carrying on the business of travel agents of P.I.A. at Nowshera. The amount collected for the freight and sale of the tickets by the said company were cheques (i.e. Cheque CAX 622571, 622575 and 623762) all worth Rs.3,64,707.40 for payment to the respondent No.1 at United Bank Limited, Lahore Branch. On presentation all these cheques were dishonoured and thus a complaint under section 409/420/109, P.P.C. was filed against the appellant and the 5 respondents in the Court of the; District Magistrate, Peshawar. An application under section 561A of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashment of the respondent No. 1's complaint against them was filed by the appellant in the Peshawar High Court and the learned Single Judge vide his order dated 16‑2‑1971 allowed the application. Respondent No. 1 filed a petition for leave to appeal against the. judgment of the High Court which was granted to examine the question in view of the law declared by this Court m "Ghulam Muhammad v. Muzammil Khan" P L D 1967 Pesh.
317. In appeal the order of the High Court being without Jurisdiction was set aside and the District Magistrate Peshawar was directed to issue fresh notice under section 202, Cr.P.C. to the appellant and the 5 respondents who were allowed to raise the points advanced in the High Court or any other plea that will he available to them under the law. The appellant submitted an application for review to the effect that they have no knowledge for the case fixed for 15‑12‑1980 and according to the learned counsel it was on the said date i.e.15‑12‑1980 that he became aware at Karachi through Mr. Noori Advocate‑on‑Record of P.I.A.C. and was told by the said A.O.R. that the case has‑been heard in Peshawar on the same date. The learned counsel for the appellant before us reiterated the same arguments that on 15‑12‑1980 he was arguing a case at Karachi when he was made aware there at Karachi by Mr. Noori AOR of the case fixed for hearing of the appeal by this Court at Peshawar. On the other side Mr Bilal learned counsel for the respondent No.1 questioned the maintainability of this appeal and referred us to a power of attorney of the Advocate‑on‑Record i.e. a green sheet on page 32 of the file alongwith an‑application of enter appearance. The power of attorney bears a note of this Court dated 15‑12‑1980 with the following words:‑ "This appeal is fixed for hearing before the Court at Peshawar today the 15‑12‑1980. Mr. M. A. Siddiqui, Advocate‑on‑Record has been informed of this position which was noted by Mr. MA. Siddiqui on the same date i.e. 15‑12‑1980." Similarly, the enter appearance application also carry the note to the same effect of the same date i.e. 15‑12‑1980. The learned counsel for the appellant was questioned that what steps he or his client took after the power of attorney was filed whereupon he was told that the case is fixed on that date i.e. 15‑12‑1980. The learned counsel have no reply and failed to explain as to whether he tried to intimate through telephone or telegram to this Court at Peshawar on 15‑12‑1980 requesting for adjournment or likewise. Under the circumstances, there is no merit in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed. N.H.Q.//R‑149/S Appeal dismissed.