SCMR 2014

2014 PLP 1667 (SCMR)

KAMRAN MURTAZA — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No.65 of 2014, decided on 15th August, 2014.
Honorable Judges
Nasir-ul-Mulk, C.J., Jawwad S. Khawaja, Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Mushir Alam JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2014 PLP 1667 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Nasir-ul-Mulk, C.J., Jawwad S. Khawaja, Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Mushir Alam JJ
Parties KAMRAN MURTAZA — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2014 PLP 1667 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2014 PLP 1667 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasir-ul-Mulk, C.J., Jawwad S. Khawaja, Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Mushir Alam JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2014 PLP 1667 (SCMR) (KAMRAN MURTAZA — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan

Representation

  • Date of hearing: 15th August, 2014.

Headnotes / Summary

(Petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan)

Arts. 2A, 17 & 184(3)

Constitutional petition under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution

Protest marches by political parties

Democratic polity

Democratic constitutional dispensation

Saving of

Unconstitutional measures

Petitioner contended that the political standoff or impasse created by the protest marches had adversely affected all spheres of national life and that such a situation may prompt or embolden some authorities or functionaries to take undue advantage of the situation and to resort to some unconstitutional measures; that the Supreme Court should intervene in the matter so that the relevant issues may be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law and the democratic polity and dispensation of the Republic was not dislodged or derailed

Validity

Supreme Court directed that all the State authorities and functionaries should act only in accordance with the Constitution and the law guided by the principles enunciated in the case of Sindh High Court Bar Association v Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2009 SC 897) and they should restrain from acting in any manner unwarranted by the Constitution and the law. Sindh High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2009 SC 897 ref. Petitioner in person. Salman Aslam Butt, Attorney-General for Pakistan for the Federation.

Judgment & Decree

NASIR-UL-MULK, C.J.

This petition under Article 184(3) has been filed by Mr. Kamran Murtaza, President, Supreme Court Bar Association. It has inter alia been contended by the petitioner appearing in person that some sections of the society maintain that the general elections held in the country last year were not free and fair and sanctity of ballot had been violated in those elections undermining the democratic foundations of the Republic; that such claimed denial of political justice contemplated by the Objectives Resolution and Article 2A read with Article 17 of the Constitution is an issue which is currently engaging the public at large and the same has led to agitation in the country on a large scale. It has been maintained by him that in the handling of such agitation large scale violations of the citizens' fundamental rights under Articles 9, 14, 15, 16, 23 and 24 of the Constitution are taking place and in this regard he has referred to killing of a number of persons including police officials, unauthorized seizing of containers of private persons or commercial enterprises by the police for its own use and restrictions placed upon the citizens' freedoms regarding movement and unarmed peaceful assembly. He has further submitted that in view of the protest marches of the agitating political parties and others in and towards the capital city of Pakistan , the daily lives of the residents of that city are in peril and the democratic constitutional dispensation in the country is in jeopardy. The petitioner has maintained that the political standoff or impasse created by the situation is adversely affecting all spheres of national life and that such situation may prompt or embolden some authorities or functionaries to take undue advantage of the situation and to resort to some unconstitutional measures. According to him this Court being at the apex of the dispute resolution mechanisms in the country and having the requisite jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights of the citizens under Article 184(3) of the Constitution and also possessing the power under Article 187(1) of the Constitution to issue such directions or orders as may be necessary for doing complete justice in any case or matter should intervene in the matter so that the relevant issues may be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and the law and the democratic polity and dispensation of the republic is not dislodged or derailed.

2. The contentions of the petitioner noted above require consideration. Let a notice of this petition be issued to the respondent and to the learned Attorney-General for Pakistan under Order XXVII-A, Rule 1, C.P.C. for 18-8-2014. in the meanwhile all the State authorities and functionaries are directed to act only in accordance with the Constitution and the law who shall be guided by the principles of Constitution and Law enunciated in the case of Sindh High Court Bar Association v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2009 SC 897) and they are restrained from acting in any manner unwarranted by the Constitution and the law. MWA/K-3/SC Order accordingly.