2018 PLP 1501 (CLD)
A.H.K.D. SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED — Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD), SECP, ISLAMABAD — Respondent
| Citation | 2018 PLP 1501 (CLD) |
| Forum / Court | Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | A.H.K.D. SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED — Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD), SECP, ISLAMABAD — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Securities Act (III of 2015) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2018 PLP 1501 (CLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Securities Act (III of 2015) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2018 PLP 1501 (CLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2018 PLP 1501 (CLD) (A.H.K.D. SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED — Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD), SECP, ISLAMABAD — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kamal Ali, Additional Director (SMD) and Asif Khan, Deputy Director (SMD) for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 150
Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997), S. 33
SECP Circular No. 4 dated 16.4.2013
Failure to file quarterly return
Appellant, in contravention of SECP Circular No.4 dated 16-4-2013, had not filed the quarterly financial return through online Financial Reporting System (F.R.S) for relevant quarter
Appellant had also failed to submit details of Bank accounts, a hard copy of half yearly accounts and a hard copy of annual accounts for the relevant year
Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) issued show-cause notice to the appellant for contravention of S.150(1) & 150(2) of Securities Act, 2015
Appellant failed to reply to the notice
No one appeared on behalf of the appellant on fixed date of hearing, Commission imposed penalty of Rs.1,000,000 on the appellant
Appellant had challenged the impugned order on the ground that show-cause notice was not served in appropriate manner
Representatives of the appellant stated that appellant's office having been closed for the last three years, no service was possible on the said address
Appellant had not informed the Commission about closure of its office
Plea of the appellant with regard to closure of its office was not tenable
Appellant did not submit the reply to the show-cause notice, nor attended the proceedings
Appellate Bench of the Commission, in view of giving of opportunity of hering to the appellant set aside the order of the Commission with direction to serve the show-cause notice on the appellant at its Chief Executive Officer's (CEO) address as provided by the appellant.
Judgment & Decree
1. This Order is in the matter of Appeal No. 51 of 2017 filed by A.H.K.D Securities (Pvt.) Limited (the Appellant) against the Order dated 30/05/17 (the Impugned Order) passed by the Commissioner-SMD (the Respondent) under Section 150 of the Securities Act, 2015 (the Act).
2. Brief facts of the case are that the Appellant, in contravention of Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (the Commission) Circular No.4 dated 16/04/13 had not filed the quarterly financial return through the online Financial Reporting System (the FRS) for the quarter ended 30/06/16, 30/09/16 and 31/12/16. The Appellant also failed to submit details of bank accounts, a hard copy of half yearly accounts and a hard copy of annual accounts for the year ended as required by PSX Notice No. PSX/N-798 dated 08/02/17, PSX Notice No. PSX/N 797 dated 08/02/17 and PSX Notice No. PSX/N-1118 dated 22/02/17.
3. The Respondent took notice and issued a Show Cause Notice dated 10/04/17 (the SCN) to the Appellant for the contravention of sections 150(1) and 150(2) of the Act. The Appellant had not filed a reply to the SCN. Hearings were fixed on 19/04/17 and 27/04/17, however, no one appeared on behalf of the Appellant. In view of the aforementioned violations, the Respondent imposed a penalty of Rs.1,000,000/- on the Appellant.
4. The Appellant has challenged the Impugned Order, inter alia on the ground, that the SCN was not served in the appropriate manner. Whereas, the Respondent has denied and rebutted the grounds of Appeal.
5. The Appellant's representatives stated that the Appellant's office has been closed for the last three years, therefore, no service was possible on said address. The Appellant's representatives argued that non-service of SCN and hearing notices is the violation of "right of fair trial". The Appellant's representation further stated that for a valid service the Respondent was required to serve the hearing notices and SCN on the Appellant's Chief Executive Officer's (CEO) address. The Respondent's representatives argued that the SCN and hearing notices were duly served on the registered office of the Appellant and in case of change of address the Appellant was required to inform the Commission. The Respondent's representative further stated that no new address was communicated to the Commission, therefore, Appellant should bear the consequences of its negligence.
6. The Appellate Bench (the Bench) has heard the parties and perused the record. It is evident from the record that the Appellant never informed the Commission about closure of its office situated at; A.H.K.D Securities (Pvt.) Limited, 414, 4th Floor, Karachi Stock Exchange Buildinz I.I. Chundrigar Road, Karachi. The Bench has noted that the Commission vide a covering letter dated 02/06/17 forwarded an attested copy of the Impugned Order to the Appellant on the aforementioned address and the same covering letter is annexed with this Appeal at page number six. The Bench has also observed that title page of this Appeal also contains the same address. The above two facts shows that Appellant plea with regard to closure of its office is not tenable. Furthermore, as per relevant law, the Respondent was required to serve notices on the registered office of the Appellant and in this regard, the Respondent had followed the law.
7. Notwithstanding, the facts contained herein above, the Appellant neither submitted the reply to the SCN nor hearing was attended therefore, to secure the ends of justice, we are inclined to provide an opportunity of hearing to the Appellant, to plead its case on merit before the Respondent.
8. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case we hereby set aside the Impugned Order and direct the Respondent to provide an opportunity of hearing to the Appellant. We further direct the Respondent to serve the SCN on Appellant and its CEO address. Through this Order we also direct the Appellant to provide an up-to-date CEO's address for service of SCN and hearing notice.
9. The Appeal is disposed of accordingly, without any order as to cost. HBT/18/SEC Order accordingly.