2012 PLP 1152 (MLD)
FEROZE KHAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2012 PLP 1152 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | FEROZE KHAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 1152 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 1152 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 1152 (MLD) (FEROZE KHAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S.497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324/149/504/114/337-H(2)
Attempt to commit qatl-e-amd, unlawful assembly, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, abettor presented when offence committed, hurt by rash or negligent act
Medical report of accused revealed that he had recurrent attacks of hypertension with transient ischemic attack (TIA), and his condition was not satisfactory and his treatment in jail was not reasonable
Bail application of accused was allowed, in view of his medical report
High Court while allowing bail application of accused observed that complainant was at liberty to challenge the medical report/certificate of the accused and if the medical Board gave a contrary opinion, complainant would have the right to file application under S. 497(5), Cr.P.C.
High Court further observed that if the accused recovered, the complainant could again file an application under S. 497(5), Cr.P.C
Judgment & Decree
SHAHID ANWAR BAJWA, J.
Mr. Sangi contended that he would argue this bail application on medical grounds as well as on other grounds. However, since no medical examination was conducted by the jail authority, Medical Superintendent Central Prison-II Sukkur was directed to conduct proper medical examination of the applicant and submit report. Consequently on 17-12-2011 the Medical Superintendent GMC Hospital Sukkur submitted the following report:-- "It is submitted to your honour that above named accused attended this hospital on 15-12-2011 with the history of severe hypertensions and same was examined by the Consultant Cardiologist Dr.Zahoor Ahmed Soomro of this hospital. On examination his pulse 90/mint, BP 180/110 mmhg, chest clear, ECG WNL, after the examination, the cardiologist of this hospital opined that the above named accused has complaint of chest pain and attacks of semi unconsciousness, the accused has severe hypertension and he needs proper look after otherwise he can develop any consequence of hypertension and advised the following treatment. 1.Tab: Diophos 10/160 (2) Tab: Cardiolite 50 mg 1 OD(3) Tab: Firisum 10 mg 1/2 BD (4) Tab:Zolip 1 HS (5) Tab: Lowplate 1 OD. " When this matter came up on 23-1-2012 the Medical Superintendent, since he had nowhere stated in his report that applicant could be satisfactorily or reasonably treated in jail or not, was directed to render his report in this regard. Consequently on 30-1-2012 the Medical Superintendent GMC Hospital Sukkur submitted the following report:-- "In continuation of this office Letter No: MS/GMC/(Med: Exam)/16272/73 dated 17-12-2011. It is submitted to your honour that the Consultant Cardiologist Dr.Zahoor Ahmed Soomro of this hospital has examined the UTP/case he is of the opinion that the UTP has recurrent attacks of severe hypertension with transient ischemic attack (TIA). His condition is not satisfactory and his treatment in jail is not reasonable." When confronted with this position learned D.P.G. stated that he does not oppose the bail application. However, learned counsel for the complainant stated that firstly he wants to challenge the medical report and secondly even if the medical report is accepted, the medical condition of the applicant is transient and therefore, he would like to reserve for himself opportunity of making application under section 497(5), Cr.P.C. In view of the medical opinion submitted by the Medical Superintendent this bail application, is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be admitted to bail upon his executing P.R. bond for a sum of Rs.200,000 (Two Lacs) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. However, the complainant shall be at liberty to challenge the medical certificate and if the medical board gives contrary opinion he shall have the right to file application under section 497(5), Cr.P.C. Similarly if the applicant recovers the complainant may also again file an application under section 497(5), Cr.P.C., if that application is filed and when it is considered it will be available to the counsel for the applicant to argue the bail application on merits. M.W.A./F-7/K Bail granted.