PLD 1991

P L D 1991 Lahore 420 (PLP)

Syed ALI RAZA ASAD ABIDI — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ISHAO KHAN, PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1991 Lahore 420 (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties Syed ALI RAZA ASAD ABIDI — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ISHAO KHAN, PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN
Primary Law (i) Interpretation of statutes, (d) Interpretation of Constitution, (c) Interpretation of Constitution
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1991 Lahore 420 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: (i) Interpretation of statutes, (d) Interpretation of Constitution, (c) Interpretation of Constitution, (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (f) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (j) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (e) Interpretation of statutes, (g) Interpretation of Constitution as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1991 Lahore 420 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1991 Lahore 420 (PLP) (Syed ALI RAZA ASAD ABIDI — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ISHAO KHAN, PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(i) Interpretation of statutes (d) Interpretation of Constitution (c) Interpretation of Constitution (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (f) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (j) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (e) Interpretation of statutes (g) Interpretation of Constitution

Representation

  • Dr. Farooq Hassan for Petitioner. Attorney-General for Respondents.F.=.~ ~',.:.*

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 41(7)

Interpretation of Art. 41(7)

Clause (7) of Article 41, Constitution of Pakistan (1973) related to a particularized President mentioned by name therein and was only intended to serve a particular situation which lost its utility and efficacy with the death of said named President and in fact for all intents and purposes Art. 41 (7) is inoperative in the circumstances arising from the demise of the late President

Reading someone else's name in place of named President would defeA t the very purpose for which clause (7) of Art. 41 was promulgated as it was confined to the named President alone and said clause being a particularized provision could not be interpreted in a manner to make it generally applicable in situations not envisaged by provision itself. [p. 424) A

Arts. 41(3) & (7)

Interpretation

President envisaged by the opening words of Art.41(3) was the person mentioned by name in Art.41(7) and he having ceased to be the President on account of his demise, his term contemplated by Art.41(7) came to an end alongwith his death. [p. 4241 B

Interpretation resulting in a complete constitutional chaos has to be obviated and avoided being not countenanced by the framework of the Constitution and of necessity. [p. 424] C

Constitutional provision cannot be interpreted in a pedantic, dogmatic and narrow campus so as to deflect the underlying intention of the Constitution--Interpretation being more plausible, effective and harmonious which could give effect to the totality of the provisions of the Constitution governing the subject has to be given preference on the more rigid and narrow interpretation. [p.424] D

Whole aim of construction as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framework and the necessities which gave rise to it

Court has to place itself in the position of those who framed and adopted the particular provision of the Constitution

It the meaning be at all doubtful, the doubt should be resolved, wherever reasonably possible to do so, in way to forward the evident purpose with which the provision was adopted. [p. 425] E

Art. 41(7)

Purpose of Article 41(7) was to provide a term of five years for the named President notwithstanding the position that he had not been elected in the manner otherwise provided for by the Constitution for election of a President [p. 425] F

Effect has to be given to every part and every word of the Constitution and as a general rule Court should avoid construction which may render any provision meaningless or inoperative

Court is bound in law to lean in favour of a construction which will make every word operative rather than one which may make some words idle or redundant. [p. 425] H

Arts. 49(l) & 41(5)

After falling vacant the office of the President on demise-of the late President of Pakistan on 16-&1988, Chairman of the Senate assumed the office of the President by virtue of Art. 49 (1) who could hold that office in view of the position that the National Assembly stood dissolved at that time, only upto 30 days of the holding of the general elections to the National Assembly which concluded on 13-11-1988

Office of the President of Pakistan thus of necessity had to be filled in through election within 30 days from

Court to have recourse to the instrument as a whole, if necessary; to ascertain the true intent and meaning of any provision and even if there be any apparent repugnancy between the different provisions, the Court should harmonise them, if possible rather than render any provision meaningless. [p. 426] I

Arts. 199 & 41(6)

Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199

Assumption of office of President of Pakistan after falling of the vacancy of the President on demise of President on 16-8-1988

Bar contained in Art. 41(6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) was squarely applicable and validity of the President holding the office was beyond question. [pp. 426, 427] J & N

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Quo warranto

Laches

Laches would not generally apply in cases of quo warranto but then the Court can also not ignore the application of this principle if the attendant circumstances are such which militate against the bona fide's of the petitioner.

[Laches].

Arts. 44 & 41 (7)

Provision of Art. 41 (7) was intended to serve a particular situation relating to a particularized President

Term of office of the President of Pakistan having been provided for by Art. 44 as five years from the date he enters upon his office, would equally apply to the President elected on the occurrence of a vacancy or otherwise as no distinction in this behalf was made in any provision governing the subject and Art. 41(7) would not detract from the validity of this view. [p. 427] M

Judgment & Decree

Art. 41(7)

Purpose of Article 41(7) was to provide a term of five years for the named President notwithstanding the position that he had not been elected in the manner otherwise provided for by the Constitution for election of a President [p. 425] F (g) Interpretation of Constitution

Effect has to be given to every part and every word of the Constitution and as a general rule Court should avoid construction which may render any provision meaningless or inoperative

Court is bound in law to lean in favour of a construction which will make every word operative rather than one which may make some words idle or redundant. [p. 425] H Reference by the President of Pakistan under Article 162 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan PLD 1957 SC (Pak.) 219. ref (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Arts. 49(l) & 41(5)

After falling vacant the office of the President on demise-of the late President of Pakistan on 16-&1988, Chairman of the Senate assumed the office of the President by virtue of Art. 49 (1) who could hold that office in view of the position that the National Assembly stood dissolved at that time, only upto 30 days of the holding of the general elections to the National Assembly which concluded on 13-11-1988

Office of the President of Pakistan thus of necessity had to be filled in through election within 30 days from 13-11-1988

To contend that notwithstanding that the office of the President had fallen vacant on 16-8-1988, the election of the President could not be held on 20-4-1990 would tantamount to violence of the Constitutional provisions and rendering Art. 41( 5) of the Constitution as nugatory. [p. 425] G Reference by the President of Pakistan under Article 162 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan PLD 1957 SC (Pak.) 219 ref. (i) Interpretation of statutes

Court to have recourse to the instrument as a whole, if necessary; to ascertain the true intent and meaning of any provision and even if there be any apparent repugnancy between the different provisions, the Court should harmonise them, if possible rather than render any provision meaningless. [p. 426] I (j) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Arts. 199 & 41(6)

Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199

Assumption of office of President of Pakistan after falling of the vacancy of the President on demise of President on 16-8-1988

Bar contained in Art. 41(6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) was squarely applicable and validity of the President holding the office was beyond question. [pp. 426, 427] J & N (k) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Quo warranto

Laches

Laches would not generally apply in cases of quo warranto but then the Court can also not ignore the application of this principle if the attendant circumstances are such which militate against the bona fide's of the petitioner.

[Laches]. Laches would not generally apply in cases of quo warranto but then the Court can also not ignore the application of this principle if the attendant circumstances are such which militate against the bona fides of the petitioner. [p. 426] K In the present case the election of respondent to the office of the President of Pakistan was held on 12th December, 1988 and in pursuance of that election, respondent took oath of his office on 13th of Dccember, 1988 and is performing his functions as President of Pakistan since then. The attempt of the petitioner at such a belated stage to call in question the validity of the said election and as a consequence the validity of the acts of the President, was bound to create confusion and chaos which in national affairs must be avoided as far as possible, especially when no ground exists for holding that the election of the President held on 12th of Decerneber, 1988 suffered from any legal infirmity. The circumstances which float manifestly on the surface warranted an explanation from the petitioner about the delay in filing the petition. Nothing at all has been urged to explain the inordinate delay of 2-1/2 years from the date of the questioned election of the President and more than one year even from 20-3-1990, in filing the petition. This was yet another valid basis for refusing to entertain this petition. [p. 426] L (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Arts. 44 & 41 (7)

Provision of Art. 41 (7) was intended to serve a particular situation relating to a particularized President

Term of office of the President of Pakistan having been provided for by Art. 44 as five years from the date he enters upon his office, would equally apply to the President elected on the occurrence of a vacancy or otherwise as no distinction in this behalf was made in any provision governing the subject and Art. 41(7) would not detract from the validity of this view. [p. 427] M Dr. Farooq Hassan for Petitioner. Attorney-General for Respondents.F.=.~ ~',.:.* Date of hearing: 5th June, .1991. nz.