CLD 2011

2011 CLD 857 (PLP)

DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI — Complainant Versus Khawaja ANWAR MAJEED, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ANSARI SUGAR MILLS, KARACHI — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Environmental Protection Tribunal Karachi
Decided Date
2010-May-31
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 CLD 857 (PLP)
Forum / Court Environmental Protection Tribunal Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI — Complainant Versus Khawaja ANWAR MAJEED, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ANSARI SUGAR MILLS, KARACHI — Respondent
Primary Law Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (XXXIV of 1997)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 CLD 857 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (XXXIV of 1997) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 CLD 857 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Environmental Protection Tribunal Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 CLD 857 (PLP) (DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI — Complainant Versus Khawaja ANWAR MAJEED, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ANSARI SUGAR MILLS, KARACHI — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (XXXIV of 1997)

Representation

  • Muhammad Rafi for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 16

Environmental Tribunals (Procedure and Functions) Rules, 2008, R.9(c)

Change of management of mills

Complaint against new management

New management had taken over the charge of mills in question from the Receiver

Samples were taken and examined much prior to taking over the charge of mills by new management

Such change of management of mills being not in the knowledge of the complainant, no fresh notice of personal hearing under S.16(1) of Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 had been served on the new management

Samples of material in question were collected about nine months prior to taking over the mills by new management and at that time personal hearing was given to the then management

Later on, samples were again collected two years after change of management, but neither said samples were delivered to the new management nor copy of the laboratory report was delivered to them; and complaint had been filed without providing the opportunity of hearing to new management

Such conduct of the authorities reflected their negligent, careless and non-serious attitude in performance of their official duties

Present complaint, was also silent as to whether new management was complying with the smart program or not

When the results of the laboratory were again found in excess of National Environment Quality Standard, it became incumbent upon the authorities to monitor the mills

Application under R.9(c) of the Environmental Tribunals (Procedure and Functions) Rules, 2008 filed for withdrawal of complaint, was allowed, with permission to file fresh one if so required.

Judgment & Decree

By this order, we intend to dispose of application in hand under Rule 9(c) of the Environmental Tribunals (Procedure and Functions) Rules, 2008 moved by the Director-General, E.P.A. Sindh, seeking withdrawal of above complaint. The instant application is moved on the ground that the present management on 1-11-2008 had taken over the charge of Ansari Sugar Mills Limited from the receiver, duly appointed by the Lahore High Court in 1998. The samples were taken and examined under the provisions of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997, much prior to the said date and the fact of change of management of Ansari Sugar Mills Limited was not in the knowledge of the complainant, therefore, no fresh notice of personal hearing under section 16(1) of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 has been served, as under the legal provision of said Act an opportunity had to be afforded to the new/present management of Ansari Sugar Mills Limited, therefore, present application for withdrawal of complaint is moved. The learned D.D.P.P. has also supported the averments made by the complainant in his withdrawal application and has further stated that the provision of personal hearing as provided under subsection (1) of section 16 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997, is mandatory, therefore, withdrawal application filed by the complainant may be allowed with permission to file afresh, if required, after fulfilling all the legal requirements. We have gone through the contents of application filed by the complainant and have perused the case record. It appears from the perusal of record that the present management has taken over the charge of Messrs Ansari Sugar Mills Limited on 1-11-2008 whereas industry was first visited by the S.E.P.A. in the year 2008 and the samples were collected in the month of February, 2008, personal hearing was given to the then management on 15-2-2008. Later on the samples were again collected in the month of January, 2010 but neither samples were delivered to the present management nor copy of the Laboratory report was delivered to them. Besides, no personal hearing as provided under subsection (1) of section 16 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 was given to the existing management. No E.P.O. was, issued and simply complaint is filed before this Tribunal. Surprisingly though the samples were taken in the year 2008 and the results were found in excess of National Environmental Quality Standards but no steps were taken by the S.E.P.A. and two years and again in the year 2010 after taking the samples afresh, but without providing the opportunity of hearing to the present respondent, this complaint has been filed. This conduct on the part of S.E.P.A. reflects their negligent, careless and non-serious attitude in performance of their official duties. The present complaint is also silent as to whether the respondent is complying with smart program or not. Under these circumstances when the results are again found in excess of National Environmental Quality Standards it becomes incumbent upon S.E.P.A. to monitor the Ansari Sugar Mills Limited and after affording opportunity of hearing action may be taken in accordance with Law. Such report may be submitted before the Tribunal within thirty days of this order. Copy of this order may also be sent to the Secretary Environment, Government of Sindh for information and necessary action. With these observations, the application under Rule 9(c) of the Environmental Tribunals (Procedure and Functions) Rules, 2008 for withdrawal of present complaint is allowed with permission to file afresh, if required, after fulfilling the legal requirement. Consequently the accused Khawaja Anwar Majeed, Chief Executive, Ansari Sugar Mills Limited is acquitted. He is on bail, ills bail bond stands cancelled and surety stands discharged. H.B.T./1/ET???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Application allowed.