SCMR 2022

2022 PLP 544 (SCMR)

ABDUL GHANI — Appellant/Petitioner Versus The STATE through P.G. Balochistan and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Criminal Appeal No.3-Q and Criminal Petition No.29-Q of 2021, decided on 3rd November, 2021.
Honorable Judges
Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed and Jamal Khan Mandokhel, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2022 PLP 544 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed and Jamal Khan Mandokhel, JJ
Parties ABDUL GHANI — Appellant/Petitioner Versus The STATE through P.G. Balochistan and another — Respondents
Primary Law (a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860), (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2022 PLP 544 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: (a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860), (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2022 PLP 544 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed and Jamal Khan Mandokhel, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2022 PLP 544 (SCMR) (ABDUL GHANI — Appellant/Petitioner Versus The STATE through P.G. Balochistan and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860) (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Representation

  • Ahsan Rafiq Rana, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant/ Petitioner (in both cases).
  • Abdul Razzaq Sher, Advocate Supreme Court for the State (in both cases).

Headnotes / Summary

(Against the judgment dated 22.02.2021 passed by the High Court of Balochistan, Sibi Bench in Crl. Revision and Appeal Nos. (S) 30 and 114 of 2019)

S. 376(1)

Rape of minor

Reappraisal of evidence

Juvenile accused

Sentence of ten years' rigorous imprisonment awarded by Trial Court enhanced to imprisonment for life by the High Court

Whether justified

Plea of accused that negative forensic report cast shadow on the reliability of prosecution case, benefit whereof cannot be withheld from the accused

Validity

Child victim being in tender nubility was clinically established to have been violated, a circumstance that required no further forensic corroboration

Negative reports do not reflect upon the veracity of prosecution case for reasons more than one

D.N.A. profile generation though a most meticulous method with unfailing accuracy, nonetheless, requires an elaborate arrangement about storage and transportation of samples, a facility seldom available

Even a slightest interference with the integrity of samples may alter the results of an analysis and, thus, the fate of prosecution case cannot be pinned down to the forensic findings alone, otherwise merely presenting a corroborative support, hardly needed in the face of overwhelming evidence, presented by the prosecution through sources most unimpeachable

Crime was reported with a remarkable promptitude; accused being a close family relation, the timeframe does not space any hypothesis of consultations or deliberations

Given the violence inflicted upon the child, enhancement of accused's sentence by the High Court, his juvenility notwithstanding, cannot be viewed as excessive or harsh

Petition for leave to appeal and appeal were both dismissed.

S. 376

Rape

Penetration

Penetration is sufficient to constitute the offence (of rape) and there are many factors, physical as well as psychological, that may intervene during a carnal assault, impeding complete consummation of carnal assault

Such subsequent failures do not redeem the enormity of initial assault. Abdul Razzaq Sher, Advocate Supreme Court for the State (in both cases). Noor Jahan Kahor, Additional Prosecutor General Balochitan for the Complainant (in both cases).

Judgment & Decree

QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.

The appellant, indicted for violating Fazeela prosecutrix, 9, was returned a guilty verdict by a Juvenile Court at Naseerabad, District Dera Murad Jamali; convicted under section 376(1) of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 he was sentenced to 10-years' R.I. vide judgment dated 07.08.2019, enhanced to imprisonment for life by a learned Division of Bench of the High Court of Balochistan vide impugned judgment dated 22.02.2021, vires whereof, are being assailed through the captioned petition as well as appeal as of right.

2. According to the prosecution, the prosecutrix Fazeela Bibi (PW-1) accompanied by her sister Shireen (PW-2) was grazing goats when the appellant, no other than her father's first cousin, taking advantage of solitude violated her within the view of her younger sister; she was found lying unconscious when pursuant to information conveyed by Shireen, the family approached her lying unattended. This happened on 12.7.2018 at 4:00 p.m. whereas the report was laid with the police at 5:00 p.m. followed by medical examination of the victim on 13.7.2018 that clinically confirmed carnal assault; samples dispatched for generation of D.N.A. profile as well as confirmation of seminal stains were returned in the negative. 2(sic.) Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the prosecutrix as well as her younger sister, being impressionable children of extreme tender age, respectively 9 and 8 years, were not worthy of credit and, thus, implicit reliance upon their testimony is an option fraught with the potential risk of error, a fundamental flaw that escaped notice by the courts below; negative forensic report inescapably casts shadow on the reliability of prosecution case, benefit whereof cannot be withheld; it is alternately argued that in any case there was no occasion for the High Court to enhance the legal sentence particularly in view of tender age of the appellant with no history to haunt his past; tried as a juvenile, the wage settled by the learned trial Judge could not be viewed as inappropriate warranting interference by the High Court, concluded the learned counsel. The learned Law Officer has faithfully defended the impugned judgment; according to him, wage settled by the High Court is most conscionable in circumstances. 2(sic.) Heard. Record perused.

3. The incident occurred in a remote rural part of the Province of Balochistan when the prosecutrix's father was away to Quetta and rushed back upon receipt of information. In this backdrop, the crime is reported with a remarkable promptitude; petitioner being a close family relation, the timeframe does not space any hypothesis of consultations or deliberations. The child being in tender nubility is clinically established to have been violated, a circumstance that required no further forensic corroboration. Negative reports do not reflect upon the veracity of prosecution case for reasons more than one. D.N.A. profile generation though a most meticulous method with unfailing accuracy, nonetheless, requires an elaborate arrangement about storage and transportation of samples, a facility seldom available. Even a slightest interference with the integrity of samples may alter the results of an analysis and, thus, the fate of prosecution case cannot be pinned down to the forensic findings alone, otherwise merely presenting a corroborative support, hardly needed in the face of overwhelming evidence, presented by the prosecution through sources most unimpeachable. Penetration is sufficient to constitute the offence and there are many factors, physical as well as psychological, that may intervene during a carnal assault, impeding complete consummation of carnal assault. Such subsequent failures do not redeem the enormity of initial assault, a case otherwise established to the hilt. Given the violence inflicted upon the child, enhancement of appellant's sentence by the High Court, his juvenility notwithstanding, nonetheless, cannot be viewed as excessive or harsh. Petition as well as appeal fail. Dismissed. MWA/A-6/SC Order accordingly.