2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
RUKAN-UD-DIN and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Home Department and others
| Citation | 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi High Court |
| Bench Members | Syed Zawwar Hussain Jaffery and Amir Hani Muslim, JJ |
| Parties | RUKAN-UD-DIN and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Home Department and others |
| Primary Law | Police Order (22 of 2002) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Police Order (22 of 2002) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi High Court bench comprising: Syed Zawwar Hussain Jaffery and Amir Hani Muslim, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (RUKAN-UD-DIN and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Home Department and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Shabeer Khoso for Petitioners.
- Anwar Mansoor Khan, A.-G., Sindh for Respondent.
- ----Art.45---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Petitioners had sought declaration that act of authorities avoiding to make payment of honoraria and TA/DA to them was illegal, mala fide, based on discrimination and without lawful authority---Petitioners had prayed for making payment of honoraria as provided under Art.45 of Police Order, 2002---Advocate General had stated that he was not in a position to make positive statement as to when the Rules in terms of Art.45 of Police Order, 2002 would be framed as said Rules were to be framed in consultation with the NRB---Effect---Provincial Government was directed by the High Court to frame proposed Rules in terms of Art.45 of Police Order, 2002 and seek approval of NRB within specified period by sending it to NRB and in case NRB failed to approve proposed Rules, same would be published as if such Rules were approved by NRB while in the intervening period, petitioners and other members, who were entitled to TA/DA could be disbursed amount of Rs.3000 per Month as suggested by the Department in the proposed summary.
Headnotes / Summary
Art.45
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Petitioners had sought declaration that act of authorities avoiding to make payment of honoraria and TA/DA to them was illegal, mala fide, based on discrimination and without lawful authority
Petitioners had prayed for making payment of honoraria as provided under Art.45 of Police Order, 2002
Advocate General had stated that he was not in a position to make positive statement as to when the Rules in terms of Art.45 of Police Order, 2002 would be framed as said Rules were to be framed in consultation with the NRB
Effect
Provincial Government was directed by the High Court to frame proposed Rules in terms of Art.45 of Police Order, 2002 and seek approval of NRB within specified period by sending it to NRB and in case NRB failed to approve proposed Rules, same would be published as if such Rules were approved by NRB while in the intervening period, petitioners and other members, who were entitled to TA/DA could be disbursed amount of Rs.3000 per Month as suggested by the Department in the proposed summary.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioners have filed the present proceedings with the following prayers:-- ??????????? (a) Declare that the act of respondents avoiding to make payment of Honoraria and TA/DA to the petitioners is illegal, mala fide based on discrimination and ???? without lawful authority. ??????????? (b) Direct the respondents to make payment of Honoraria, as provided under ?? Article 45 of the Police Order, 2002 and TA/DA to the petitioners at the rate of ?????? Rs.5,000 per month from the date of their nomination/appointment as member of ?????? District Public Safety and Police Complaint Commission, Sukkur w.e.f. 5-8-2002 ??????? i.e. date of issue of Notification. ??????????? (c) Award cost of this petition. ??????????? (d) Grant any other relief in the circumstances of this case. Notice was issued upon which, the Home Department has filed the comments, in which, it has been stated that the Rules, which were required to be framed in terms of Article 45 of the Police Order, 2002, have not been framed till date. It is most unfortunate that more than four years have passed but the concerned agencies have not framed the rules. The Home Department in its comments has stated that it has moved the summary with the suggestion that the TA/DA to all members of DPS and PCC in Sindh be fixed at the rate of Rs.3000 per month per member along with arrears. According to the Home Department the matter is under process. The learned A.-G. Sindh states that he is not in a position to make positive statement as to when the rules in terms of section 45 of the Police Order, 2002 would be framed as these Rules are to be framed in consultation with the NRB. In these circumstances, we direct the Sindh Government to frame the proposed rules in terms of Article 45 of the Police Order, 2002 and seek approval of the NRB within three months from today by sending it to' NRB. In case the NRB fails to approve the proposed rules the same shall be published as if such rules were approved by the NRB. In the intervening period the petitioners and other members who are entitled to TA/DA may be disbursed amount of Rs.3000 as suggested by the Home Department in the proposed summary. The Home Department shall release the arrears and current amount of TA/DA to the petitioners and other members of the DPS and PCC forthwith. The petitioner has expressed his satisfaction and does not press this petition, which is accordingly disposed of as not pressed. Copy of this order be sent to the Home Department and NRB for compliance. H.B.T./R-26/K???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.