2021 PLP 1392 (YLR)
SHABBIR AHMED — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent Criminal Bail Application No. 692 of 2020, decided on 15th May, 2020.
| Citation | 2021 PLP 1392 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh |
| Bench Members | Abdul Maalik Gaddi and Mrs. Rashida Asad, JJ |
| Parties | SHABBIR AHMED — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent Criminal Bail Application No. 692 of 2020, decided on 15th May, 2020. |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2021 PLP 1392 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2021 PLP 1392 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: Abdul Maalik Gaddi and Mrs. Rashida Asad, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2021 PLP 1392 (YLR) (SHABBIR AHMED — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent Criminal Bail Application No. 692 of 2020, decided on 15th May, 2020.). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zafar Ahmed Khan, Additional Advocate General, Sindh for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Sindh Arms Act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)
Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Ss. 4 & 5
Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7
Possession of illegal weapons, explosives and grenade, act of terrorism
Allegedly, the statements of prosecution witnesses and statements of accused involved in the case had been recorded
Further proceedings could not be taken place as the Presiding Officer of the trial court was on earned leave and trial was being delayed
Accused was also chronic heart patient with high blood pressure and was not being properly treated inside the jail
Accused would be satisfied and would not press the bail application, if the matter was transferred to other court for its disposal
Scope
Record showed that accused was arrested in that case on 11.3.2015 and since then he was behind the bars, almost more than four (4) years had been passed, but trial had still not been concluded
Expeditious and fair trial was fundamental right of the accused as envisaged under Art. 10A of the Constitution
Delay in disposal of case and imparting justice could reduce the confidence of public in judicial system and would cause frustration and anguish
Object of criminal prosecution was not to punish undertrial prisoners for alleged offence and accused could not be detained for an indefinite period without remedy of trial
Present matter along with connected matters was withdrawn from the file of Anti-Terrorism Court and transferred to the other Anti-Terrorism Court for their disposal according to law
Transferee Court was directed to proceed those cases and decide the same as early as possible as per law
Since, the accused was facing heart disease, which was not disputed, therefore, under the circumstances, Superintendent, Central Prison, was also directed to provide all medical facilities to the accused inside jail and if his treatment was not possible inside the jail then he might be referred to any government recognized hospital for his treatment, but as per law
Bail application stood disposed of in the above terms Raja Hassan Nawaz for Applicant.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL MAALIK GADDI, J.
1. Urgency disposed of.
2. Over ruled. 3-4. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the applicant that applicant is in custody since 11.3.2015. He further submits that Special Case No.D-238/2015 and Special Case No.E-238/2015, out of Crime No.54/2015, under section 23(i)(a) of Sindh Arms Act, and sections 4/5, Explosive Substances Act, read with section 7, A.T.A. of Police Station Azizabad, Karachi, were amalgamated by the trial Court with other connected matters, pending before trial Court being Crimes Nos.52 to 65 of 2015 respectively of Police Station Azizabad, Karachi and according to him, in these matters, trial Court has recorded evidence of all prosecution witnesses and statements of accused involved in the said crimes have also been recorded, but further proceedings could not be taken place as the learned Presiding Officer of the trial Court is on earned leave and trial is being delayed. He further submits that applicant Shabbir Ahmed is chronic heart patient with high blood pressure and is not being properly treated inside the jail, therefore, he prayed that jail authorities may be directed to provide all medical facilities to the applicant as per law. However, under the circumstances, he submits that he would be satisfied and shall not press this bail application, if instant matter along with other connected matters may be withdrawn from the file of Anti-Terrorism Court No.XVIIth, Karachi (being vacant), and transferred to any other Anti-Terrorism Court having jurisdiction for disposal of these matters as per law as early as possible. Learned Additional Prosecutor General, Sindh present in Court in other cases, waives notice and recorded his no objection to the above propositions. It appears from the record that accused was arrested in this case on 11.3.2015 and since then he is behind the bars, almost more than four (4) years have been passed, but trial has still not been concluded. It is observed that expeditious and fair trial is fundamental right of the accused as envisaged under Article 10A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Delay in disposal of case and imparting justice can reduce the confidence of public in judicial system and would cause frustration and anguish. The object of criminal prosecution is not to punish under trial prisoners for alleged offence and accused could not be detained for an indefinite period without remedy of trial. Under these circumstances, the instant matter along with connected matters are withdrawn from the file of Anti-Terrorism Court No.XVIIth, Karachi, and transferred to the Court of Anti-Terrorism Court No.XVIth, Karachi, for their disposal according to law. Since these matters pertain to year 2015, therefore, on receipt of files, transferee Court is directed to proceed these cases and decide the same as early as possible as per law under intimation to this Court, and no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted to either side. Since the applicant is facing heart disease, which is not disputed, therefore, under the circumstances, Superintendent Central Prison, Karachi is also directed to provide all medical facilities to the applicant Shabbir Ahmed inside jail and if his treatment is not possible inside the jail, then he may be referred to any government recognized hospital for his treatment, but as per law. The bail application stands disposed of in the above terms. Office is directed to send the copy of this order to the trial Court for information and compliance. JK/S-73/Sindh Order accordingly.