1990 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
FARHAT MAHMOOD LODHI Versus GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
| Citation | 1990 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Federal Service Tribunal |
| Bench Members | Rasheed‑ud‑Din Arshad and |
| Parties | FARHAT MAHMOOD LODHI Versus GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN |
| Primary Law | Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Federal Service Tribunal bench comprising: Rasheed‑ud‑Din Arshad and.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (FARHAT MAHMOOD LODHI Versus GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S.M.K. Lodhi for Appellant.
- Date of hearing: 22nd February, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑R.8‑A‑‑‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4‑‑‑Promotion from Grade‑17 to Grade‑18‑‑‑Essentials‑‑‑Recruitment Rules laid down a positive requirement of five years service in Grade‑17 for promotion to Grade‑18‑‑‑Power of relaxation in individual cases had however, been given where firstly, the concerned Ministry considered it fit to be so relaxed and secondly such relaxation was approved by the Establishment Division‑‑‑In the case of Grade‑16 employees or below, where first appointment of a person (other than person covered by proviso II of Establishment Division's Memo. No. 1/9/80‑R‑(II)(A), dated 12th January, 1981), was made to Government service in Grade‑16 or below, one‑half of service in Grade‑16 and one‑fourth of service in Grade‑15 or below might be counted as service in Grade‑17 for computing length of service for purposes of promotion only‑‑‑In the case of Ministry of Commerce under which civil servant was serving, procedure for relaxation had been laid down in the Recruitment Rules, and such Ministry only, could initiate the case for relaxation if it so deemed fit according to the procedure mentioned in the Rules‑‑‑Service Tribunal could not direct the Ministry to grant the civil servant benefit of relaxation of Rules in accordance with memorandum of Establishment Division dated 2‑6‑1983. Respondents Nos. 3 and 4 in person
Judgment & Decree
Name of the Post Persons Eligible Condition of Eligibility (1) Assistant Chief (Grade‑18) Research Officer Statistical Officer (Grade‑17). 5 years service as Research Officer/Statistical Officer in Grade‑17 subject to relaxation in an individual case where the Ministry of Commerce considers it fit to be so relaxed with the approval of the Establishment Division." Establishment Division's O.M. dated 2‑6‑1983 has been issued under Rule 8‑A of Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1983 which lays down that no promotion on regular basis shall be made in Grades 18 to 21 unless the officer concerned has completed such minimum length of service as may be speed from time to time. It reads as under:‑ "In pursuance of rule 8‑A of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973 and in super-session of the instructions laid down in the Establishment Division Office Memorandum No.l/9/80-?R.II(A), dated the 12th January, 1981, the President is pleased to decide that the minimum length of service for promotion to various grades shall be as follows:‑ For Grade‑18 ????????????????????????? 5 years in Grade‑17 For Grade‑19?????????????????????????? 12 years in Grade‑17 and above For Grade‑20 ????????????????????????? 17 years in Grade‑17 and above For Grade‑21 ????????????????????????? 22 years in. Grade‑17 and above Provided that:‑ (i)???????? Where initial appointment of a person not being a person in Government service takes place in a post in Grade 18, 19 or 20, the length of service specified in this office memorandum shall be reduced by the following periods: First appointment in????? Reduced by Grade‑18???????????????????? 5 years Grade‑19???????????????????? 12 years Grade‑20???????????????????? 17 years (ii)??????? Where initial appointment of a person already in Government service takes place, on recommendations of the Federal Public Service Commission, in a post in Grade 18, 19 or 20, the length of service specified in this office memorandum shall be reduced by the periods specified in proviso(i); (iii)?????? Where first appointment of a person other than a person covered by proviso (ii) was made to Government service in Grade‑16 or below, one?-half of the service in Grade‑16 and one‑fourth in Grade‑15 and below may be counted as service in Grade‑17 for computing length of service for the purpose of promotion only." The Recruitment Rules dated 14‑2‑1975 lay down a positive requirement of 5 years service as Research Officer/Statistical Officer in Grade‑17 for promotion as Assistant Chief (Grade‑18), but power of relaxation in individual cases has been given where firstly the Ministry of Commerce considers it fit to be so relaxed and secondly it is approved by the Establishment Division. We do not find any contradiction between the Recruitment Rules and Establishment Division's O.M. dated 2‑6‑1983 where the word "shall" has been used while laying down the minimum length of service for promotion to various grades but tile word "may" has been used for allowing the weightage for Grade‑16 or below and it has been laid that where first appointment of a person other than person covered by proviso (ii) was made to Government service in Grade‑16 or below one‑half of service in Grade‑16 and one‑fourth of service in Gradd‑15 or below may be counted as service in Grade‑17 for computing length of service for purposes of promotion only. There is as such no obligation for counting the service in Grade?16 and below for all posts, but the authorities concerned may lay down in the relevant rules that service rendered in Grade‑16 or below may be counted as service rendered in Grade‑17 to the extent mentioned in the proviso. In the case of Ministry of Commerce, the procedure for relaxation has been laid down in the Recruitment Rules and it is for the Ministry of Commerce to initiate the case for relaxation if it so deems fit according to the procedure mentioned in the rules.
5. We are, therefore, unable to accept the appeal and it is rejected. There will be no order as to costs. Parties should be informed accordingly. A.A./506/Sr. F ??????????? Appeal dismissed.