P L D 1970 Azad J & K 117 (PLP)
GHULAM HUSSAIN‑ — Petitioner Versus SARKAR‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1970 Azad J & K 117 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Yusuf Saraf, J |
| Parties | GHULAM HUSSAIN‑ — Petitioner Versus SARKAR‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1970 Azad J & K 117 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1970 Azad J & K 117 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Muhammad Yusuf Saraf, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1970 Azad J & K 117 (PLP) (GHULAM HUSSAIN‑ — Petitioner Versus SARKAR‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Kh. Bashir Ahmad Farooqi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Emergency Powers Act, 1958, Ss. 2, 8 & 13 read with Azad Jammu and Kashmir Emergency Powers (Amendment) Act, 1958, S. 19 and Council Order No. 471 dated 22‑10‑1958‑Azad Jammu and Kashmir Emergency Powers Act, 1958 empowered Government alone to regulate and control price and supply of essential commodities‑Act did not empower Govern ment to delegate such powers to any other authority‑Govern ment notification conferring powers on District Magistrates to regulate and control price and supply of essential commodities Invalid and ultra vires Azad Jammu and Kashmir Emergency Powers (Amendment) Act, 1958 enabling Government to delegate its powers to any other officer or authority‑Not retrospective in effect No order delegating such powers to District Magistrates passed by Government after passing of the Amending Act‑Order passed by District Magistrate, held, not saved by Amending Act and still ultra vires and without jurisdiction. M. A. Hafeez for the Government.
Judgment & Decree
Section 2(i): --‑ "The Government may by notification make such orders as may be deemed necessary or expedient for securing the defence of the State or for preventing persons from acting in a manner prejudicial to safety or for maintenance of law and order. 2(ii) Without prejudice to the generality of the powers conferred by subsection (i) such orders may provide for all or any of the following matters namely :‑ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ii) control and supply of essential commodities rationing and control of prices ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Section 8(vi) :‑ "No person or syndicate or firm shall hoard foodgrains in violation of existing orders or any orders that may be issued by the Government or other competent authority or indulge in black‑marketing by selling commodities at rates higher than those fixed by the competent authority." In the Emergency Powers Act as it was enacted and enforced on the 15th of October 1958, the power to regulate and control the price and supply of essential commodities was given only to the Government. In the eye o law, control and regulation of the price and supply of essential commodities comes within the definition of legislation. So it can be said that the executive Government was in this respect entrusted with delegated legislative powers by the Government acting as a Legislature but the authority to do so was neither delegated to the District Magistrate nor was the Government empowered or authorised to further delegate these powers with which it had been invested under section 2 either to the District Magistrate or to any other authority. On the 22nd of October 1958 the Government purport ing to act under section 2 issued a Notification empowering the District Magistrates under this very section to pass necessary orders for preventing hoarding of essential com. modities by means of a Notification. This Notification is reproduced below :‑ "In pursuance of the provisions of section 2 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Emergency Powers Act, 1958 read with section 8, subsection (4) of the said Act, the Azad Government is pleased to direct that the District Magistrates shall take such steps, pass such orders and give such directions as may be deemed necessary by them to prevent hoarding of foodgrains and such other commodities as may be notified by them to be essential within the local limits of their ordinary jurisdiction." Obviously the Government did not, on that date, have any power or authority under the Emergency Powers $ Act to confer such Powers on the District Magis trates and reference to section 2 of the said Act in this Notification is immaterial because this section did not authorise the Government to delegate this legislative power to any other authority. The Government ultimately seems to have become conscious of this difficulty and, therefore, on the 19th of December 1958 enacted in its legislative capacity the Emergency Powers Amendment Act of 1958. By this Amendment Act, among other things, a new section was inserted as section 19 which is reproduced below "The Government may by order direct that any power or duty which under section 2 is conferred or imposed upon, the Government shall in such circumstances and under such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the direction, be executed or discharged by any officer or authority." The use of the words "executed" is somewhat unhappy ; it should have been "exercised" but let us for the sake of argument suppose that this section is correctly worded and that under this section the Government was empowered to delegate its powers, which it enjoys under section 2, to any other authority. This Amendment Act has not been given retrospective effect as is evident from the following :‑‑‑ "Section 1 subsection (2).‑It applies to the whole of Azad Kashmir Territory and shall come into force at once." It would mean that it came into force on the 19th of December 1958, the date when it was enacted and enforced. That the Government has not since the 19th of December 1958 the date of coming into force of this Amendment Act, issued any order delegating its powers wholly or partly which it enjoys under section 2 of the Act to the District Magistrates is quite apparent and has been conceded even by the learned Counsel appearing for the Government. That the District Magistrate in this case has referred to the Government Notification of 22nd October 1958, as the source of his authority, leaves no room for doubt that no order o or Notification was issued by the Government since the coming into force of section 19. The position that thus emerges is as follows:
(1) On 22‑10‑1958 when the District Magistrate was invested by the Government with powers under section 2, the Government had no authority or power to do the same. (2) The authority to delegate such powers was conferred on the Government for the first time on the 19th Decem ber 1958. (3) No order conferring such powers on the D. M. has been issued since the enactment and enforcement of section 19 on the 19th of December 1958. (4) The Amendment. Act incorporating section 19 enforced on 19‑12‑1958 has not been given retrospective effect by the Legislature. Therefore, as on the 22nd of October 1958 the Govern ment did not possess the authority to delegate its powers under section 2 to the District Magistrates, the Notifi cation conferring such powers on the latters is invalid and ultra vices. As no such order has been issued by the Government since the 19th of December 1958 when authority to delegate its powers under section 2 was conferred by the Amendment Act on it and the Amendment Act not having been given retrospective effect the notification remains a nullity and has no force in the eyes of law. I, therefore, accept the revision petition and holding the District Magistrate's orders of the 26th of March 1970 as being ultra vires of the Emergency Powers Act and without jurisdiction, set it aside and quash the proceedings taken against the petitioners. S. A. H. Revision accepted.