P L D 2025 Balochistan 149 (PLP)
SABIRA ASAD — Petitioner Versus SAAD BIN ABDULLAH and another — Respondents
| Citation | P L D 2025 Balochistan 149 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SABIRA ASAD — Petitioner Versus SAAD BIN ABDULLAH and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Elections Act (XXXIII of 2017) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 2025 Balochistan 149 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Elections Act (XXXIII of 2017) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 2025 Balochistan 149 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 2025 Balochistan 149 (PLP) (SABIRA ASAD — Petitioner Versus SAAD BIN ABDULLAH and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khalid Ahmed Kubdani and Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Sasoli for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss.62 & 104(3)
Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199
Submission/ scrutiny of nomination papers for reserved seats
Powers of Returning Officer of the constituency
Transgression
Invoking constitutional jurisdiction of High Court
Scope
Petitioner (a political party nominated candidate) filed constitutional petition as Returning Officer of her constituency for general seats rejected her nomination papers for reserved seats for women
Petitioner submitted two nomination papers before Returning Office of relevant constituency at the relevant office, one for general seat for the National Assembly and second for the reserved seat of women for National Assembly from her political party
Record reveals that the nomination papers for the reserved seats for women from her political party were rejected by the said RO
Indisputably, though the said RO was authorized and competent to scrutinize the nomination papers of the candidates from the said constituency for general seats, but had absolutely no authority and power either to accept or reject the nomination papers of a party nominated candidate for the reserved seats as per priority list
Provincial Election Commissioner (PEC) was appointed as Returning Officer for the seats reserved for women and non-Muslims, thus, he (PEC/RO) was competent alone for receipt of nomination papers, scrutiny and decision thereon
In the present case, the petitioner had filed nomination papers for reserved seats for women before the RO of the constituency instead of filing the same before the PEC/RO, which error could have been rectified and corrected by the RO of constituency either by transmitting the nomination papers to the PEC/RO or could have returned the nomination papers to the petitioner to file the same before the competent Returning Officer i.e. (PEC/RO), but the RO of constituency rejected her nomination papers without any lawful authority and jurisdiction, which indeed was required to be rectified and corrected by High Court, while exercising jurisdiction under Art. 199 of the Constitution in order to meet the ends of justice as an aggrieved person cannot be left remediless
High Court declared the order of rejection of the nomination papers null and void and directed the matter to be transmitted to the Provincial Election Commissioner being RO of the reserved seats for women, who after due scrutiny shall render decision thereon forthwith in accordance with law
Consti-tutional petition was allowed accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
SHAUKAT ALI RAKHSHANI, J.
The instant constitutional petition has been filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 ("Constitution") by the petitioner, which carries the following relief;- "It is respectfully most respectfully prayed that while keeping in view the above made humble submissions, narrations, facts and circumstances, this Honorable Court may kindly be pleased to call the nomination papers of petitioner from the respondent No. 1 and the instant petition may kindly be allowed by issuing direction to the respondent No.2 to include the name of petitioner in the final list of reserved seat for women National Assembly. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be awarded in favor of petitioner. This will meet the ends of justice.".
2. Facts relevant to the lis in hands are that the petitioner being member of the National Party filed two nomination papers, one for general seat NA-262, Quetta-I for the National Assembly and one for the reserved seat of women for National Assembly from her party, who was called for scrutiny on 26.12.2023 by Returning Officer-Assistant Commissioner, City Quetta of National Assembly ("RO of NA-262"). Petitioner stated that she appeared before the said RO along with proposer and seconder, who securitized both of her nomination papers and accepted both the nomination papers. However, subsequently, on 24.01.2024, when the petitioner visited the website of Provincial Election Commissioner, Balochistan (respondent No.2), her name was not enlisted, thus, she immediately approached respondent No.2, who was informed that the petitioner had not submitted her nomination papers in his office, being the RO for the reserved seats for women, hence this petition.
3. Heard. Record perused with the able assistance of learned counsel for the petitioner and Assistant Director, Election Commission of Pakistan ("ECP").
4. The petitioner submitted two nomination papers, one for general seat NA-262, Quetta-I for the National Assembly and second for the reserved seat of women for National Assembly from National Party in the office RO of NA-262, Quetta-I, who after scrutiny accepted both her nomination papers. Record reflects that the nomination papers for the reserved seats for women from National Party were rejected by the RO of NA-262-Quetta-I, thus, the stance of the petitioner that her nomination papers for the reserved seats was accepted does not coincide with the record. Indisputably, the RO of NA-262, Quetta-I was authorized and competent to securitize the nomination papers of the candidates from the said constituency for general seats, but had absolutely no authority and power either to accept or reject the nomination papers of a party nominated candidate for the reserved seats as per priority list. The Provincial Election Commissioner, Balochistan (respondent No.2) was appointed as RO for the seat reserved for women and Non-muslims, thus, he was competent alone for receipt of nomination papers, scrutiny and decision thereon.
5. In the instant case, the petitioner had filed nomination papers for reserved seats for women before the RO of NA-262 instead of filing the same before the RO (respondent No.2), which error could have been rectified and corrected by the RO of NA-262, Quetta-I either by transmitting the nomination papers to the RO (respondent No.2) or could have returned the nomination papers to the petitioner to file the same before the competent Returning Officer i.e., (respondent No.2), but the RO of NA-262 rejected the nomination papers of the petitioner without any lawful authority and jurisdiction, which indeed requires to be rectified and corrected by this Court, while exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution in order to meet the ends of justice as an aggrieved person cannot be left remediless.
6. For what has been discussed hereinabove, the petition is partly accepted and consequently the order of rejection of the nomination papers is declared null and void and same shall be deemed pending, which is directed to be transmitted to the RO of the reserved seats for women i.e, respondent No.2, who after due scrutiny shall render decision thereon forthwith in accord ance with law. MQ/136/Bal. Order accordingl