MLD 2012

2012 PLP 1702 (MLD)

RAMESH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No.S-321 of 2012, decided on 2nd July, 2012.
Honorable Judges
Shahid Anwar Bajwa, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2012 PLP 1702 (MLD)
Forum / Court Sindh
Bench Members Shahid Anwar Bajwa, J
Parties RAMESH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 1702 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 1702 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: Shahid Anwar Bajwa, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 1702 (MLD) (RAMESH — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 279/322/285/287

Rash driving or riding on a public way, qatl-bis-sabab, negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter, negligent conduct with respect to machinery

Bail, grant of

Accused, who was driver of the van in question, was alleged to have overloaded the van and also allegedly ignored the complaints of the passengers about leakage of gas from the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) cylinder of the vehicle, which subsequently caught fire, killing the wife and children of the complainant

Contentions of the accused were that punishment prescribed under S. 322, P.P.C. was only Diyat whereas Ss. 279, 285 & 287, P.P.C, were bailable, and that CNG kit was the responsibility of the owner of the vehicle

Validity

Sections of P.P.C under which the accused was charged were either bailable or the punishment prescribed was only Diyat, therefore none of them fell under the prohibitory degree of S. 497, Cr.P.C

Accused was entitled to bail as a matter of right therefore there was no discretion but to grant bail to him

High Court ordered the release of the accused on bail with the observation that both administrative and legislative steps should be taken for providing a more strict regime for regulating CNG based vehicles and most stringent provisions in such regard should be considered. Tariq Mehmood v. State 2005 YLR 1968; Muhammad Nadeem v. State 1998 MLD 1537; Ahmed Khan v. State 1997 MLD 1591 and Yousuf Khan v. State 2000 PCr.LJ 203 ref. Waqar Ahmed Laghari for Applicant. Syed Meeral Shah, Deputy Prosecutor General Sindh for The State.

Judgment & Decree

SHAHID ANWAR BAJWA, J.

F.I.R. No.78 of 2011 of Police Station Matiari was recorded on 8-12-2011 at 1-00 p.m for an incident alleged to have occurred the previous day at 4-30 p.m. The complainant stated that he received information that due to Van accident his wife and children had died. The complainant reached the place of the accident and found that there was a Van which had been burnt and fire brigade was extinguishing the fire and burnt bodies were being removed from the Van by the police and the public and he came to know that at least 11 persons had died and many others had sustained injuries. Van in question was being operated through CNG. It was complained that the Van was overloaded. Passengers complained about leakage and smell of the gas but the present applicant, the driver, did not pay any heed and due to short-circuiting the fire started. The driver left the Van and escaped and fire encircled the entire Van due to which 11 people lost their lives. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the F.I.R. has been recorded under sections 322, 279, 285 and 287, P.P.C. He submitted that the punishment prescribed under section 322, P.P.C. is only Diyat whereas sections 279, 285 and 287, P.P.C. are bailable being punishable upto imprisonment for two years in case of section 279 and six months in other two sections. He further submitted that CNG kit is responsibility of the owner of the vehicle. Learned counsel referred to 2005 YLR 1968 (Tariq Mehmood v. State) 1998 MLD 1537 (Muhammad Nadeem v. State), 1997 MLD 1591 (Ahmed Khan v. State) and 2000 PCr.LJ 203 (Yousuf Khan v. State). Learned Additional Prosecutor-General Sindh vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that it is a case of gross negligence wherein 11 persons have lost their lives and nine have been seriously injured. He submitted that laboratory report has certified that the CNG cylinder of the vehicle was no longer a fit cylinder. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel and have also gone through the record. The sections under which the applicant has been charged are either bailable and in case of section 322, P.P.C. they are punishable with Diyat only. Therefore, none of the sections fall within the prohibitory degree. As such, the applicant, as a matter of right is entitled to bail. Contention of learned Deputy Prosecutor-General Sindh that 11 persons have lost their lives and nine have been seriously injured and the cylinder was no longer in a fit condition and therefore bail should be refused, if accepted would amount to the Court putting something in the law which has not been placed by the Legislature in it. I am fully conscious of the fact that the accidents like these are very serious matters and should not be handled with kid gloves. The whole machinery of State in this regard starting from those who give fitness certificates to these vehicles and going upto-all the Regulatory Agencies, are, it appears, either winking at the problem or there is lack of full awareness of consequences of their acts of omission or commissions. It is high time that the registration agencies and the certification authorities design mechanisms to ensure that the vehicles that carry CNG cylinders, and CNG cylinders, which are a veritable piece of dynamite ready to explode at the indication of the slightest weakness whether caused by designs or mechanical creep in the walls of the cylinder etc. are really safe. Both administrative and the Legislative step should be taken for providing more stringent regime for regulating CNG based vehicles, whether public transport or private, and most stringent provisions in this regard should be considered. Be that as it may since offences with which the applicant is charged are bailalbe I have no discretion but to grant this application. Consequently, this application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail upon his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000 (Rupees two lacs) with P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. MWA/R-12/K Bail granted.