PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

Raja MUHAMMAD AFZAL Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore High Court
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.7178 of 1991, decided on 28th August, 1991.
Honorable Judges
Gul Zarin Kiani, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Lahore High Court
Bench Members Gul Zarin Kiani, J
Parties Raja MUHAMMAD AFZAL Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT
Primary Law (f) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (d) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (e) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: (f) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (d) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (e) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (c) Rule of law, (b) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Gul Zarin Kiani, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Raja MUHAMMAD AFZAL Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(f) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (d) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (e) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) (c) Rule of law (b) Civil service

Representation

  • Zafar Pasha Chaudhry for Petitioner.
  • Irfan Qadir, Addl. A.-G for Respondents on Court's call.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Public administration...

Increasing political interference

Effect

Rapidly increasing political interference with administrative matters relating to services was fast eroding discipline in them and was adversely affecting their efficiency and capacity to perform their public duties independently.

Transfer

Mala fides

Transfer of civil servant was mala fide when it was made not for professed purpose, such as in normal course or in public or administrative interest or in the exigencies of service, but for other purpose i.e. to accommodate another person for undisclosed reasons.

Basic principle

Basic principle of rule of law and good administration is that administrative actions should be just and fair.

Art. 199

Civil service

Petitioner, civil servant seeking assistance of Member of the National Assembly to approach Education Minister for transfer at specified place

Respondent was aided by a Provincial Minister, an M.NA. and M.P.A for rescission of his transfer order and holding on his post at specified place

Locus standi to invoke Constitutional jurisdiction

High Court expressed its reluctance to interfere with a matter which was part of terms and conditions of service falling for its resolution in a jurisdiction left by .law for others

Petitioner having himself set the ball rolling by utilizing political influence and pressure to gain advantage, interference on his behalf would not be just for perpetuating his gain, though respondent also acted similarly to stick to his post.

Art. 199

Constitutional jurisdiction in administrative matters

Scope-- High Court would come to the aid of victims of administrative tyranny, to scrutinise the matter and in a deserving case was prone to give relief to the oppressed and victimized persons.

Art. 199

Civil service

Matter of transfer and conduct of inquiry of petitioner and respondent was left to the good judgment of competent authority, which, it was expected would not go unnoticed by it in the interest of service discipline itself

High Court, having left the matter to the good judgment of competent authority, declined interference in matter relating to transfer and inquiry of petitioner and respondent.

Judgment & Decree

Transfer

Mala fides

Transfer of civil servant was mala fide when it was made not for professed purpose, such as in normal course or in public or administrative interest or in the exigencies of service, but for other purpose i.e. to accommodate another person for undisclosed reasons. (c) Rule of law

Basic principle

Basic principle of rule of law and good administration is that administrative actions should be just and fair. (d) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Art. 199

Civil service

Petitioner, civil servant seeking assistance of Member of the National Assembly to approach Education Minister for transfer at specified place

Respondent was aided by a Provincial Minister, an M.NA. and M.P.A for rescission of his transfer order and holding on his post at specified place

Locus standi to invoke Constitutional jurisdiction

High Court expressed its reluctance to interfere with a matter which was part of terms and conditions of service falling for its resolution in a jurisdiction left by .law for others

Petitioner having himself set the ball rolling by utilizing political influence and pressure to gain advantage, interference on his behalf would not be just for perpetuating his gain, though respondent also acted similarly to stick to his post. (e) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Art. 199

Constitutional jurisdiction in administrative matters

Scope-- High Court would come to the aid of victims of administrative tyranny, to scrutinise the matter and in a deserving case was prone to give relief to the oppressed and victimized persons. (f) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Art. 199

Civil service

Matter of transfer and conduct of inquiry of petitioner and respondent was left to the good judgment of competent authority, which, it was expected would not go unnoticed by it in the interest of service discipline itself

High Court, having left the matter to the good judgment of competent authority, declined interference in matter relating to transfer and inquiry of petitioner and respondent. Zafar Pasha Chaudhry for Petitioner. Irfan Qadir, Addl. A.-G for Respondents on Court's call.