PLC(CS) 2024

2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

AZIZULLAH MEMON and others Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and others

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh High Court (Sukkur Bench)
Decided Date
Constitutions Petitions Nos.D-142 and D-455 of 2023, decided on 30th April, 2024.
Honorable Judges
Adnan-ul-Karim Memon and Muhammad Abdur Rahman, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Sindh High Court (Sukkur Bench)
Bench Members Adnan-ul-Karim Memon and Muhammad Abdur Rahman, JJ
Parties AZIZULLAH MEMON and others Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and others
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh High Court (Sukkur Bench) bench comprising: Adnan-ul-Karim Memon and Muhammad Abdur Rahman, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2024 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (AZIZULLAH MEMON and others Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan

Representation

  • Muzafar Ali Dehraj for Petitioners.
  • Ali Raza Baloch, Assistant Advocate General, Sindh for Respondents.
  • 3. The petitioner's counsel informed the Court today that special quotas had been allocated in all departments of the province. Nonetheless, he stated, the Sindh government was not giving government jobs to PWDs, praying to take notice and order the government to comply with. Additional Advocate General (AAG) Sindh submitted that there were/are vacancies in government offices, assuring this Court that the seats would be filled as per policy.
  • Learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr. Sohail Rajput the Chief Secretary, Sindh states that at present 1572 vacancies of differently-abled persons are available and in consequent to the advertisement made in 2021-22 applications are invited to fill available vacancies and many applications have already been received different DRCs. He states that the petitioners who have raised the grievances before the High Court or any other forum if already for their applications before the DRCs would be considered in accordance with law or if they have not filed, they may file their applications in the office of the Additional Secretary, S&GAD within 15 days. It is further categorically stated that these 1572 vacancies will be filled within a period of 90 days.

Headnotes / Summary

Arts.14, 25, 189, 190 & 199

Civil service

Appointment against disabled quota

Petitioners sought appointment against disabled quota in the light of policy of the Government and a judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan

Failure of the Government to exhaust the quota reserved for disabled persons

Effect

Contention of the petitioners was that they were deprived of their right to appointment against the quota reserved for disabled persons despite the fact they had been duly issued certificates of disability by the concerned authorities, therefore, they were discriminated against

Validity

In view of the principle of equality and non-discrimination the Government is obliged to ensure that persons with disabilities enjoy (i) the right to equality; (ii) a life with dignity; and (iii) respect for their integrity

Fundamental postulate of equality and non-discrimination is made available to persons with disabilities without constraining it with the notion of a benchmark disability

There is a critical qualitative difference between the barriers faced by persons with disabilities and other marginalized groups and in order to enable persons with disabilities to lead a life of equal dignity and worth, it is not enough to mandate that discrimination against them is impermissible, which is necessary, but not sufficient, rather it must be equally ensured that they should be provided the additional support and facilities that are necessary for them to offset the impact of their disability

Dicta laid down by the Supreme Court is binding upon the High Court under Art. 189 of Constitution

Constitutional petition was disposed of with a direction that cases of the petitioners were required to be considered by the competent authority in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court passed in CPLAs Nos.745-K to 750-K dated 14-7-2022.

Judgment & Decree

ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J.

Petitioners seek directions to the official Respondents to appoint them on the basis of their disable quota, already framed by the Government of Sindh, at 5% in each and every department of Government of Sindh as per policy framed by the Government, they seek further direction for implementation of the order dated 14.07.2022 passed by Supreme Court in CPLAs Nos.745-K to 750-K.

2. The petitioners claimed that the provincial government had failed to grant jobs to People with Disabilities (PWDs) on quotas reserved for them despite obtaining disability certificates from Director General Sindh Persons with Disabilities Protection Authority (SPDPA), Karachi as well as from Provincial Coordinator Social Welfare Department. In this regard, the Supreme Court in CPLAs Nos.745-K to 750-K strictly ordered the Sindh government to comply with recruitment quotas for PWDs. However, they have been deprived of from their fundamental rights which are clear violation of law and rules hence, they maintained these petitions.

3. The petitioner's counsel informed the Court today that special quotas had been allocated in all departments of the province. Nonetheless, he stated, the Sindh government was not giving government jobs to PWDs, praying to take notice and order the government to comply with. Additional Advocate General (AAG) Sindh submitted that there were/are vacancies in government offices, assuring this Court that the seats would be filled as per policy.

4. Perusal of record shows that petitioners have obtained disability certificate(s) issued to them by the concerned authorities. The Supreme Court has held that the fundamental postulate is based on the principle of equality and non-discrimination. The obligation on the government to ensure that persons with disabilities enjoy (i) the right to equality; (ii) a life with dignity; and (iii) respect for their integrity. The fundamental postulate of equality and non-discrimination is made available to persons with disabilities without constraining it with the notion of a benchmark disability. There is a critical qualitative difference between the barriers faced by persons with disabilities and other marginalized groups. In order to enable persons with disabilities to lead a life of equal dignity and worth, it is not enough to mandate that discrimination against them is impermissible. That is necessary, but not sufficient. It is further stated that we must equally ensure, as a society, that we provide them the additional support and facilities that are necessary for them to offset the impact of their disability. The dicta laid down by the Supreme Court is binding upon this Court under Article 199 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973.

5. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Pakistan in CPLAs Nos.745-K to 750-K while disposing off appeals of Government of Sindh have observed as under; "The proceedings were initiated by differently abled persons, projected their grievance that despite availability of specific quota meant for them, they have not been considered or appointed. The High Court consequently passed an order and thereafter initiated contempt proceedings from which the instant petition seeking leave of this Court against the order of the High Court have been filed. Learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr. Sohail Rajput the Chief Secretary, Sindh states that at present 1572 vacancies of differently-abled persons are available and in consequent to the advertisement made in 2021-22 applications are invited to fill available vacancies and many applications have already been received different DRCs. He states that the petitioners who have raised the grievances before the High Court or any other forum if already for their applications before the DRCs would be considered in accordance with law or if they have not filed, they may file their applications in the office of the Additional Secretary, S&GAD within 15 days. It is further categorically stated that these 1572 vacancies will be filled within a period of 90 days. In the circumstances, we would converted these petitions into appeal and would dispose them off by suspending the contempt proceedings for period of 90 days allowed the provincial government to complete process of appointment and issuance of appointment letters to 1572 differently-abled persons within that period after completion of process in accordance with law and then to file compliance report before the High Court." Prima facie, the case of the petitioners is required to be duly considered by the competent authority of respondents in the light of judgment of Supreme Court stated supra.

6. These petitions are disposed of in terms of order dated 14.07.2022 passed by Supreme Court in CPLAs Nos.745-K to 750-K. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within two weeks. The Chief Secretary Sindh and Secretary of concerned department to comply the order as stated above. SA/A-58/Sindh. Order accordingly.