CLC 1989

1989 PLP 812 (CLC)

Messrs HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD.‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, NAWABSHAH and 5 others‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Constitutional Petitions Nos. D‑268 and D‑269 of 1985, heard on 17th January, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Saeed-uz-zaman Siddiqui and Allahdino G. Memon, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 812 (CLC)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Saeed-uz-zaman Siddiqui and Allahdino G. Memon, JJ
Parties Messrs HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD.‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, NAWABSHAH and 5 others‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 812 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 812 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Saeed-uz-zaman Siddiqui and Allahdino G. Memon, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 812 (CLC) (Messrs HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD.‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, NAWABSHAH and 5 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • ‑‑‑5. 62(1) & Sch. V, Part III, Entry No.6, proviso [as added by Sind Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance (I of 1988)]‑‑Sind Government's Notification No.SOV/DC‑V (7)/85 Pt‑1 dated 28‑6‑1986‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Levy and recovery of "Rawangi Mahsool" on specified items‑‑Notification dated 28‑6‑1986 levying and recovery of "Rawangi Mahsool" being subordinate legislation is prospective in operation‑‑Sind Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance, 1988 having come into force on 30‑5‑1988 could not validate notification dated 12‑6‑1986 because notifications issued under delegated authority are always prospective in nature and could not be made retrospective in operation‑‑Levy and recovery of "Rawangi Mahsool" on specified goods of petitioner exported from municipal limits of "N" was declared to be illegal, void and of no legal effect. Sharf Faridi for Appellant. M.H. Burney for Respondent. Date of hearing: 17th January, 1989.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Sind Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)‑‑ ‑‑‑Sch. V, Part III, Entry 6, proviso [as added by Sind Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance (I of 1988)]‑‑Levy and collection of "Rawangi Mahsool" on export of rectified spirit, sugar, molasses and biogases produced and exported by petitioner from local limits of "N" Municipal Committee and which passed through limits of District Council "N" during transit‑‑Legality‑‑Unless goods on which "Rawangi Mahsool" was demanded were exported actually from the local limits of District Council, no "Rawangi Mahsool" could be recovered in respect of the same. Wazir Ali Industries v. Secretary to Government of Sind 1985 C L C 1843 rel. (b) Sind Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)‑‑ ‑‑‑Sch. V, Part III, Entry No.6, proviso [as added by Sind Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance (I of 1988)]‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Levy and recovery of "Rawangi Mahsool" on export of specified goods for a period which is much prior to the date of promulgation of Ordinance (I of 1988) was illegal, void and of no legal effect. (c) Sind Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)‑‑

Judgment & Decree

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 128 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Governor of Sind is pleased to make and promulgate the following Ordinance:‑ (1 This Ordinance may be called the Sind Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance, 1988. (2) It shall come into force at once. 2‑ In the Sind Local Government Ordinance, 1979, hereinafter referred to as the said Ordinance, in Schedule V, in Part III, in Entry 6, the full‑stop at the end shall be replaced by semi‑colon and thereafter the following proviso shall be added:‑ 'Provided that Rawangi Mahsool shall be livable on fire wood, timber for use in construction of buildings wheat, jav (barley), rice, cotton (ginned, unginned or waste), sugar products such as missri, rewri and sweetmeats, whether such thing or substance is exported from the urban limits or rural limits of the revenue District.' (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the said Ordinance or rules thereunder or any judgment, order or decree of any Court:‑ (a) The Government of Sind, Housing Town Planning, Local Government and Rural Development Department Notification No.SOV/DC‑V(7)/85. pt. I, dated the 12th June, 1986, authorising the levy of Rawangi Mahsool on certain commodities, shall always be deemed to have been validly issued and enforced and taken effect accordingly but in the case of District Council Hyderabad and the District Council Nawabshah it shall be deemed to have taken effect on and from the 1st day of September, 1983, and the 19th day of May, 1984, respectively. (b The Rawangi Mahsool levied, assessed, charged, collected or realized by a District Council in pursuance of the said notifi cation shall always be deemed to have been validly levied, assessed, charged, collected or realized. Karachi, the 21, May, 1988. ASHRAF W. TABANI Governor of Sind" A careful reading of short title and commencement given in section 1 of Ordinance I of 1988, will show that it came into effect on the date of its promulgation. By section 2 of the Ordinance a proviso has been added at the end of Entry No.6 in part III of Schedule V to the Ordinance of 1979. This newly added proviso made it permissible for the Council to levy 'Rawangi Mahsool' in respect of items which are mentioned therein, if they are exported from Urban as well as Rural limits of the Revenue District. There is no indication in the language of section 2 that this newly added proviso at the end of Entry No.6 in Part III of Schedule V of the Ordinance, 1979 came into effect from a date prior to the date of enforcement of Ordinance I of 1988. We are, therefore, of the view that this amendment did not affect the cases before us which relate to recovery and levy of "Rawsngi Mahsool" by respondent No.l for the period which is much prior to the date of promulgation of Ordinance I of 1988. The learned counsel for the respondents, also relied on section 3 of Ordinance I of 1988 in support of their contentions that imposition of "Rawangi Mahsool" by respondent No.l on export of sugar, rectified spirit, Molasses and Bagasse stood validated even if their initial levy was not valid under the Ordinance. Section 3 of Ordinance No.l of 1988, purports to give effect to Notification No.SOV/DC‑V(7)/85, Pt. I,. dated 12‑6‑1986, issued by Government of Sind under subsection (1) of section 62 of the Ordinance in the case of District Council Nawabshah from 19‑5‑1984. (Note: In the notification which is printed in the Sind Government Gazette, Extraordinary dated 28‑6‑1986 only subsection (1) of Sind Local Government Ordinance 1979 is mentioned which appears to be a mistake and should be read as subsection (1) of section

62. It is as follows:‑ " No.SOV/DC‑V(7)85 Pt.I‑In pursuance of the provisions of subsection (1) of the Sind Local Government Ordinance, 1979, the Government of Sind are pleased to direct that a District Council shall levy 'Rawangi Mahsool' on fire wood, timber, for C use in construction of buildings, wheat, Jav (barely) rice, cotton (ginned, unginned or waste) and sugar and sugar products such as Miseri, Rewri and sweetmeats products within the limits of the District Council, whether such thing or substance is exported from the Urban limits or rural limits of the District." It is well‑settled law that subordinate legislation in the nature of notification, rules etc. issued in exercise of delegate authority under an Act are always prospective in their operation and, such, it D is open to serious doubts if the above notification could be made operative retrospectively by Ordinance No.l of 1988. Apart from under section 62(1) of the Ordinance of 1979 the Government could direct levy of such tax, rate, toll or fee by the council which the Council is competent to levy under the Ordinance. In those circumstances, even if we presume that the above notification became operative from 19‑5‑1984, it could not validate the levy of 'Rawangi Mahsool' by respondent No.l from that date as the proviso at the end of Entry No.6 of Part III in Schedule of the Ordinance was added on 30‑5‑1988 by Ordinance I of 1988, which authorised the council to Levy "Rawangi Mahsool" on export of items mentioned therein, if they are exported from Urban as well as rural limits of the revenue district. In addition to it neither in the newly added proviso to Entry No.6 of the Schedule V in Part III of the Ordinance, nor in the notification of the Government of Sind dated 12‑6‑1986, except Sugar, the other item on which "Rawangi Mahsool" is demanded by respondent No.l are mentioned. We accordingly overrule the contention of respondent There will no order as to costs. A.A./H‑118/K Petition accepted,