MLD 2022

2022 PLP 1306 (MLD)

NAQASH RASHEED — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court (AJ&K)
Decided Date
Criminal Reference No.194-B of 2021, decided on 1st September, 2021.
Honorable Judges
Sadaqat Hussain Raja, CJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2022 PLP 1306 (MLD)
Forum / Court High Court (AJ&K)
Bench Members Sadaqat Hussain Raja, CJ
Parties NAQASH RASHEED — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2022 PLP 1306 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2022 PLP 1306 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court (AJ&K) bench comprising: Sadaqat Hussain Raja, CJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2022 PLP 1306 (MLD) (NAQASH RASHEED — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Raja Aftab Ahmed for Petitioner/accused.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 432 & 433

Reference by Presidency Magistrate to High Court

Disposal of case according to decision of High Court and direction as to costs

Scope

Accused sought bail after arrest on statutory ground of delay in conclusion of trial

Sessions Judge after hearing arguments, sent the reference to High Court for guidance

Subordinate Court could not send for any clarification/instruction under Ss. 432 & 433, Cr.P.C., consequently it was required to decide the matter by itself keeping in view the relevant provision of law as well as newly created situation

High Court observed that it High Court would not like to give any opinion on the reference sent by Sessions Judge on the question whether the period consumed due to Covid-19 pandemic would be considered as consumed by the prosecution or by accused

Court below was directed to decide the question by itself

Reference was answered accordingly. Emperor v. Madho Singh AIR 1925 All. 318 and 1998 PCr.LJ 1377 ref.

Judgment & Decree

SADAQAT HUSSAIN RAJA, CJ.

The above titled reference has been sent by District Court of Criminal Jurisdiction Poonch/Rawalakot for guidance/ opinion regarding disposal of the after arrest bail application, filed on behalf of accused/petitioner, before the concerned court. Brief facts of the case are that a case under FIR No.165/2019 under sections 147/148/149, 109, 337A, 302, 324, APC and 15-2A/AA against accused/petitioner and others at Police Station Rawalakot. The accused/petitioner was apprehended by the police. Accused/petitioner along with others have been challaned under the aforementioned offences before the District Court of Criminal Jurisdiction Rawalakot. During trial, accused/petitioner, instituted post arrest bail application, before District Court of Criminal Jurisdiction, Poonch Rawalakot (court below) on statutory ground. The learned court below after hearing arguments, sent the present reference to this Court for guidance. Without going into the detail facts and merit of the case suffice it to say that the accused/petitioner filed post arrest bail application on the statutory ground before trial Court. Raja Aftab Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner/accused and learned AAG for the respondents have been heard at length. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the law on the subject, I am of the view that the point which needs resolution by this Court is whether the reference sent by District Criminal Court Rawalakot is competent or not? A Subordinate Court was empowered to send reference to this Court for soliciting instructions as to what he should do if a new situation is arisen. Under Sections 432 and 433 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a Division Bench Karachi High Court in a Criminal Reference No. 08 of 1990 decided on 05.08.1991 decided the case on the basis of case titled "Emperor v. Madho Singh AIR 1925 All. 318" and "AIR 1949 Mad. (sic)" that any Judge/Court subordinate to this Court cannot make any reference to this Court for any instruction as to what he should do and the Judge/Court should decide the matter by himself. Subsequently, a single Bench of Karachi High Court in a case titled "Abdul Ghafoor Magsi," District and Sessions Judge Gotki 1998 PCr.LJ 1377 followed the dictum supra and observed that Sections 432 and 433 of Criminal Procedure Code which empowered subordinate Judge/Court to send a reference to this Court for soliciting instructions have been omitted. Thus, Subordinate Court cannot sent any clarification/ instruction under Sections 432 and 433, Cr.P.C, consequently the subordinate Judge/Court should decide the matter by himself keeping in view the relevant provision of law as well as newly created situation. In view of above, I would not like to give any opinion on the reference sent by District Criminal Court Rawalakot on the question whether the period consumed due to Covid-19 pandemic shall be considered as consumed by the prosecution or the accused. In view of above discussion law, the Court below shall decide the same question by itself. Thus, the reference stands answered in the manner discussed above. SA/13/AJK (HC) Order accordingly.