SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 1853 (SCMR)

THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS Petitioner Versus Messrs KUKU LIMITED and others‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No.336‑R of 1988, decided on 4th July, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Nasin Hasan Shah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 1853 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Nasin Hasan Shah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ
Parties THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS Petitioner Versus Messrs KUKU LIMITED and others‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Customs Act (Iv of 1969)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1853 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Customs Act (Iv of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1853 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasin Hasan Shah and Usman Ali Shah, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1853 (SCMR) (THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS Petitioner Versus Messrs KUKU LIMITED and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Customs Act (Iv of 1969)

Representation

  • M.A. Siddiqui, Deputy Attorney General with Manzoor Elahi, Advocate on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 4th July, 1989.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 23‑4‑1985 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Writ Petition No.3060 of 1987). ‑‑‑S.19‑‑Notification No.SR0~1277(h)/74,'1atcd 5th October, 1974‑‑Notification No.SRO 1‑18(1)/74, dated 4th December, 1974‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Art. 185(3)‑‑Installation of factory‑‑Exemption of plant and machinery to the extent of 50 per cent of customs duty in any area of Pakistan, excluding the areas specified in the notification‑‑One of the areas specified was Tehsil `S'‑‑Bv a subsequent notification, dated 30‑8‑1976 the words "Tehsil of `S"' were substituted by "Tehsil of `F"' and said amendment was made with retrospective effect so as to be valid from 4‑12‑1974‑‑Factory owner's claim for exemption from customs duty up to 50 per cent on basis of earlier notification was rejected on the ground that his factory having been situated in "Tehsil `F"' which area was covered by the amended notification was not exempt from concessions of customs duty‑‑High Court in Constitutional jurisdiction set aside the demand notice for payment of customs duty from the factory owner‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to examine contention whether Notification No.S.R.O. 148(1)/74, dated 4th December, 1974, mentioning the exemption of 50 per cent. of the customs duty excluding the area "Tehsil of `S"' which had been re‑named "Tehsil of `F"' by then. was rightly corrected by the subsequent Notification, dated 30‑8‑1976 by substituting it with the words "Tehsil of `F"', which was not a case of giving retrospective effect to a notification but only a correction of a clerical error.

Judgment & Decree

NASM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑The facts which form the background are that M/s Kuku Limited, respondent herein, imported machinery in respect of installation of Factory located on Shcikhupura Road. Tehsil Ferozewala, District Sheikhupura in 1975. During the relevant period, the Federal Government vide Notification S.R.O. No.1481(1)/74, dated the 4th December, 1974, exempted the plant and machinery to the extent of 50'1, of the customs duty, if the same was imported and installed in any area of Pakistan excluding the areas specified in Tables A & B to the aforesaid notification. One of the areas specified (in Item No.4 of Para. (ii) of Table `B' wits Tehsil Shahdara. When the machinery was received in 1975, it was released by customs, against the Bank guarantee and installed in Tehsil Ferozewala in 1975. On 30‑8‑1976, the Federal Government's Notification, dated 4‑12‑1974 was amended and in Item 4 of Para. (ii) of the Table `B', the words "Tehsil of Shahdara" were substituted by the words "Tehsil of Ferozewala". The amendment was made with retrospective effect, so as to be valid from 4‑12‑1974. After the machinery was installed in 1975, M/s Kuku Limited secured the completion certificate from the Director of Industries, Government of Punjab and filed the said certificate with other documents, with the Collector of Customs, Karachi, for the discharge of its Bank guarantee. However, this request was refused on the ground that the factory was situated in Tehsil Ferozewala, which had been excluded from the scope of the Federal Government's notification, dated 4‑12‑1974 and the respondent was asked to pay the rebate in the customs duty which was allowed to it earlier. The respondent‑Company repudiated its liability to repay the rebate which was earlier allowed to it whereupon the petitioner moved the Deputy Commissioner, Lahore and Sheikhupura for the recovery of the dues. Accordingly, the Tehsildar (Recovery), Lahore Cantonment called upon the Company to pay up the customs duties due by it, failing which its property would be attached and sold. To avoid these consequences, respondent No.1 filed a writ petition in the Lahore High Court, Lahore and the said learned Court vide judgment/order, dated 23‑4‑1988 found the demand made by the petitioner to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect and, accordingly, set it aside. Hence this petition for leave. The learned Deputy Attorney‑General has submitted that Shahdara Tchsil at one time formed part of Shekhupura District. On the 8th August, 1960, the area of Shahdara Tchsil was split up into two parts. Shahdara Town, which was within the limits of the Lahore Municipal Corporation, was made part of Lahore Tehsil, the rest of the area of Shahdara Tchsil continued to be part of Sheikhupura District as before but under the new name of Ferozewala Tehsil. Thenceforth no Sub‑Division of the District bore the name of Shahdara Tehsil. He further explained that when the Government issued Notification No.S.R.O. 1277(1)/7.1, dated 5th October, 1974 and No. S.R.O. 1481(1)/74, dated 4th December, 197‑1, under section 19 of the Customs Act, 1969, no Tehsil under the name of Sliahdara existed in the revenue papers, its name having been replaced by Fcrozcwala. By "Tchsil of Shalidara" what the Government meant m the notification was nothing else than the "Tehsil of Ferozewala'". The contention is that it is a wellrecognised principle of interpretation that modification of language and substitution of words to meet the true intention of the law‑maker is quite permissible. Accordingly, the Government Notification No.SRO 148(1)/7‑t, dated 4th December, 197.1 mentioning the exemption of 50%' of the Customs Duty excluding the area mentioned in Table `B' i.e. "Tehsil of Shahdara" which had been renamed "Tehsil Ferozewala" by then, was rightly corrected by the subsequent Notification, dated 30‑8‑1976 by substituting it with the words "Tehsil of Fcrozewala". This was not a case of giving retrospective effect to a notification, but only a correction of a clerical error. The contention needs further consideration. Leave granted. A.A./C‑43/S Leave granted.