CLCN 2018

2018 PLP 110 (CLCN)

SOHAIL AHMED — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary of Ministry of Health and 4 others — Defendants

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh
Decided Date
2018-May-22
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2018 PLP 110 (CLCN)
Forum / Court Sindh
Bench Members N/A
Parties SOHAIL AHMED — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary of Ministry of Health and 4 others — Defendants
Primary Law Prospectus for Dow University of Health Sciences (2013)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2018 PLP 110 (CLCN)?

This judgment primarily cites: Prospectus for Dow University of Health Sciences (2013) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2018 PLP 110 (CLCN)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2018 PLP 110 (CLCN) (SOHAIL AHMED — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary of Ministry of Health and 4 others — Defendants). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Prospectus for Dow University of Health Sciences (2013)

Headnotes / Summary

Preamble

MBBS and BDS (Admissions, House Job and Internship) Regulations, 2016, Reglns. 10 & 11

Student of MBBS Programme failed in three subjects in the examination of fourth year

Seeking promotion to next year without passing the said subjects

Scope

Vertical promotion was possible in any academic year if student failed in odd semester i.e. first, third, fifth, seventh and ninth being in the same academic year

Horizontal promotion from one academic year to subsequent academic year was only possible if student had cleared all the papers of that particular academic year

Student could not prove his locus standi within the four corners of examination policy framed by the University

Relief sought by the petitioner could not be granted as any positive resolve might open a flood gate of such litigation which would jeopardize the autonomy of Universities/ examination bodies

Regulations of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council were not explicit with regard to horizontal promotion of students from preceding academic year to succeeding academic year

Pakistan Medical and Dental Council was directed by the High Court to establish uniform minimum standards of basic and higher qualification in medical and dentistry throughout Pakistan to ensure uniformity in the examination system and set out policy and parameters for promotion of student from one academic semester/year to next academic year

Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. [Paras. 5, 6, 7 & 8 of the judgment]

Judgment & Decree

MRS. KAUSAR SULTANA HUSSAIN, J.

Through this application bearing C.M.A. No.6914/2018 (Under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151, C.P.C.) the learned counsel for plaintiff Sohail Ahmed sought relief that the defendants may be restrained from prohibiting the plaintiff from attending the lectures of final year of MBBS, in any manner whatsoever till final decision of the case. The plaintiff has attached his affidavit along with this application.

2. Notice of this application was given to the defendants. The learned counsel for defendant No.4 (Controller of Examination of Dow University of Health and Sciences) has submitted his counter affidavit to the present application.

3. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of present application are that the plaintiff is a student of Shaheed Muhtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College (SMBBMC), Lyari and perusing his degree of MBBS and is presently in fourth year of the said course. However, due to demise of his mother on 23.09.2017, he failed in three papers out of twelve papers. He sat in the examination of fourth year for six theoretical papers and also appeared in five examinations of viva. He, however, did not pass three theoretical papers out of six such papers, though cleared all examinations of viva. The plaintiff decided to appear in supplementary examination for three failed subjects and deposited examination fee with the request to defendant No. 5 to promote him in final year (fifth year) MBBS. His such request was turned down whereas according to him many failed students were promoted as such he is being discriminated against. He approached to defendants Nos.3 to 5 for promotion to final year but all in vain, hence this suit.

4. The defendant No.4, who is Controller of examination of Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS) with whom SMBBMC, Lyari is affiliated and is also examination body for the said medical college, in his counter affidavit opposed the contention of the plaintiff on the ground that terminal /annual examination of semester-VII of fourth year MBBS were held in the month of June, 2017 wherein plaintiff appeared and failed in four subjects which was much earlier than the sad demise of his mother which took place in September in the same year; that in September, 2017 when the mother of plaintiff expired, he was studying in semester-VIII of fourth year MBBS and as per prescribed rules, he was allowed to appear in the retake/repeat supplementary examination of the subjects of semester-VII and also semester-VIII but he failed in two subjects of semester-VII and one subject of semester-VIII; that there will only be a semester examination and retake examination for each semester and plaintiff availed both the opportunities; that it is mandatory for every student to pass all the viva as well as theory subjects of that particular module before promoting to next year; that once any student has availed the opportunity of semester examination as well as retake and remained unsuccessful in any of the subjects, he/she shall need to repeat the whole semester but at the end of the semester only need to appear in those papers in which such student failed; that before passing remaining subjects of semester-VII and VIII plaintiff cannot be promoted to semester-IX of the fifth year MBBS; that deposit of exam fee only makes the student entitled to appear in exam and not for promotion in the next year; that none of the students were promoted to final year MBBS without passing all the subjects of fourth year MBBS and that fifth year MBBS has already commenced from February, 2018 and four months already passed and if the plaintiff is allowed to attend the session of fifth year even then he cannot appear in the examination of semester-IX of fifth year MBBS on the basis of shortage of attendance, as student having attendance not less than 90% will only be allowed to appear in the examination.

5. I have carefully examined the written as well as verbal arguments put forth by both sides and also gone through relevant record presented before me. It appears that the case of plaintiff is founded on three main assertions that due to demise of his mother, he could not pass three papers in semester-VII of fourth year and subsequently also failed for two subjects of semester-VII and one subject of semester-VIII in supplementary examination; that many students who could not clear some papers but promoted as such he is being discriminated and that he has submitted supplementary examination fee but he is not being allowed promotion to semester-IX of fifth year MBBS. On the other side the arguments advanced by the defendants are based on examination policy of the University (DUHS) with whom SMBBMC, Lyari is affiliated. Per defendants, the MBBS comprises of five years course of institutions/study, which have been divided into ten semesters i.e two semesters each year. As gathered from the "Promotion Policy for Students of DUHS" dated 23.05.2013. Prospectus of DUHS, session 2013 and "Regulations Governing the MBBS examination" by the University of Karachi (submitted by defendants' side), vertical promotion is possible in any academic year if student fails in odd semester viz, first, third, fifth, seventh and ninth being in the same academic year. However, horizontal promotion from one academic year to subsequent academic year shall only be possible if the student clears all the odd and even papers of that particular academic year. I have also gone through "MBBS and BDS (Admission, House Job and Internship) Regulations 2016 notified by Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) dated 27.10.2016. It emerges from bare reading of these regulation that only sections 10 and 11 throw light on some aspects of MBBS and BDS examinations. The said sections are reproduced below:

10. Mandatory professional examinations for MBBS and BDS course

(1) For awarding MBBS degree, the respective university shall conduct professional examinations specified in column (2) of the Table below in academic year as specified in column (3) thereof, namely: S. No. Name of professional examination To be conducted (1) (2) (3)

1. MBBS first professional examination At the end of first academic year.

2. MBBS second professional examination At the end of second academic year.

3. MBBS third professional examination At the end of third academic year.

4. MBBS fourth professional examination At the end of fourth academic year.

5. MBBS final professional examination At the end of final academic year. (2) For awarding BDS degree, the respective university shall conduct professional examinations specified in column (2) of the Table below in the academic year as specified in column (3) thereof, namely: S. No. Name of professional examination To be conducted (1) (2) (3)

1. BDS first professional examination At the end of first academic year.

2. BDS second professional examination At the end of second academic year.

3. BDS third professional examination At the end of third academic year.

4. BDS final professional examination At the end of final academic year. 1.3

11. Re-admission of students.

Any, student who fails to clear first or second professional examination in four consecutive chances availed or un-availed and has been expelled on that account shall not be eligible for continuation of medical and dental studies for the MBBS and BDS in the subsequent professional examinations.

6. From the above discussion it transpired that the plaintiff could not prove his locus standi within the four walls of examination policy framed by the DUHS (examination body). Moreover his point of view is also repugnant to examination policy of Karachi University which was erstwhile examination body for almost all medical colleges in Karachi affiliated to it, hence relief sought by the plaintiff cannot be granted as any positive resolve may open a flood gate of such litigations thereby seriously jeopardizing the autonomy of Universities/examination bodies and integrity of examination system of such a delicate profession.

7. Before parting with the order, I would conclude that regulations of PMDC are not explicit with regard to horizontal promotion of students from preceding academic year to succeeding academic year on account of failure of one or more papers in an academic year as is evident from sections 10 and 11 ibid. PMDC is a statutory regulatory authority established under Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962 and is mandated to establish uniform minimum standards of basic and higher qualifications in medicine and dentistry throughout Pakistan. In order to ensure uniformity in the examination system within its area of jurisdiction specially to set out policy and parameters for promotion of students from one academic semester/year to next level academic semester/year, it is incumbent that PMDC should prepare and notify such regulations within minimum possible time but earlier to commencement of ensuing admissions in MBBS/BDS.

8. The above application bearing C.M.A. No. No.6914/2018 stands disposed of in above terms. Let copy of this order be also served upon PMDC for compliance. ZC/S-56/Sindh Order accordingly.