1982 PLP 276 (CLC)
SARDAR ALI KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE ELECTION TRIBUNAL/DISTRICT JUDGE, KHAIRP.UR
| Citation | 1982 PLP 276 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Ajmal Mian, and G. M. Kourejo, JJ |
| Parties | SARDAR ALI KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE ELECTION TRIBUNAL/DISTRICT JUDGE, KHAIRP.UR |
| Primary Law | Sind Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1982 PLP 276 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Sind Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1982 PLP 276 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ajmal Mian, and G. M. Kourejo, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1982 PLP 276 (CLC) (SARDAR ALI KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE ELECTION TRIBUNAL/DISTRICT JUDGE, KHAIRP.UR). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- K. B. Bhutto for Petitioner.
- Sajjad Husain Baloch for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 14th September, 1981.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ S. 37‑Election‑Candidate more than 21 years on date of filing of candidature‑Held, qualified to be a candidate under section 37 Irregularity, if any in mention of age in electoral roll would not vitiate election of candidate. Muhammad Tufail v. Muhammad Salkra P L D 1967 Kar. 104 and Sirajul Islam Khan v. Ahsan Ali Mondal P L D 1969 S C 5 distinguished.
Judgment & Decree
5. It may also be pertinent to refer to subsection (2) of section 6 of the Electoral Rolls Act, 1974, which reads as follows:‑ "Section 6(2).‑A person shall be entitled to be enrolled as a voter in an electoral area if he:‑ (a) is a citizen of Pakistan; (b) is not less than eighteen years of age on the first day of January in the year in which the preparation or revision of the electoral rolls com mences under this Act; (c) is not declared by a competent Court to he of unsound mind; and (d) is, or is deemed under section 7 to be, resident in the electoral area: Provided that, for the purpose of the first general election to the National Assembly or Provincial Assembly, or an election to a seat falling vacant before the holding of the second general election to the National Assembly or a Provincial Assembly, clause (b) shall have effect as if for the word "eighteen" therein the word "Twenty‑one" were substituted." It may be noticed that under the above provision, the qualifying age for a person to be enrolled as a voter given is 18 years, but through a proviso this age was increased to 21 years for the purpose of first National and Provincial Assemblies Elections.
6. Having perused the relevant provisions of the relevant enactments, it may be pertinent to refer to the cases relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner. (i) Referring to the Full Bench case reported in P L D 1967 Kar. 104, it may be pertinent to observe that the question before the Full Bench was as to whether the age of a candidate mentioned in the electoral rolls is conclusive or that it could be challenged before the Returning Officer or before any competent forum. While considering the above question, it was pointed out by Mr. Justice Anwarul Haq, J (as he then was) that whereas the age for a voter under the provisions of Electoral College Act for the purpose of National and Provincial Assemblies Election was 21 years, but under clause 1 of Article 158 of the late Constitution of 1962, there were two qualifications for a candidate for National or Provincial Assemblies Elections, namely, (1) that he must be enrolled on the electoral roll for electoral unit, (2) he must not be less than 25 years of age. It was further observed that entry of age appearing in the electoral rolls would obviously be prima facie evidence that the voter was 21 years of age, but no finality could be attached to it for the purpose of Article 158(1) which provides 25 years. (ii) Reverting to P L D 1969 S C 5 it will suffice to observe that in the above case also the Supreme Court pointed out the distinction in age provided for being a voter on the electoral rolls and for being a candidate. It was observed that the right of any person whose name appears in the electoral rolls to vote cannot be questioned as entries in the final electoral rolls have been made after elaborate inquiry and taking into account objections and claims for the said purpose. But so far as candidature for election to the Electoral College is concerned, Article 158 of the Constitution of 1962 provides that a person in order to be a candidate from a particular unit must not only be a voter of that unit but also must not be below 21 years of age. In that context, it was held that the ascertainment of the actual age of the voter is not a necessity for the purpose of preparation of the electoral rolls as it is only if it is found that the person concerned is less than 21 years of age.
7. In our view the facts of the above two cases are distinguishable for the simple reason that whereas the age of a voter provided for under the Electoral College Act, 1974, for the first National and Provincial Assemblies was 21 years, whereas under Article 158 of the late Constitution of 1962 the age of a candidate was 25 years and, therefore, it was held that the age mentioned in, the electoral roll may be conclusive to the extent that the voter was of the age of 21 years or above 21 but it cannot be conclusive as to the age provided under Article 158 of the Late Constitution of 1962 i.e. 25 years. In the instant case under section 6(2) of the Electoral Rolls Act, 1974, the qualifying age for a voter provided is only 18 years. The proviso providing the age of 21 years was in respect of the first National and Provincial Assemblies Elections. In our view the above proviso cannot be pressed into service for the purpose of election for Local Councils. Furthermore, under section 37 of the Ordinance as pointed out hereinabove the qualifications for a person to be a member of Local Council are I provided:‑ (a) that he is a citizen of Pakistan; ‑ (b) he has attained the age of 21 years ; and (c) that his name appears in the Electoral Roll. Admittedly, on the date when respondent No. 2 filed his candidature, be was more than 21 years of age and, therefore, was qualified to be a candidate under section 37 of the Ordinance. Additionally he was also on the electoral rolls on the above date. We may also observe that a complete machinery is provided in the Electoral Rolls Act, 1974, to challenge the inclusion of any person as a voter. In our view the proper stage for the petitioner to challenge the alleged illegal/irregular inclusion of respondent No. 2's name on the voter list was at the time when electoral rolls were prepared. Be that as it may, as we have observed hereinabove that in terms Ordinance, respondent No. 2 was entitled to be a candidate on the date when he filed his nomination paper, the alleged irregularity if any in mentioning of age in the electoral rolls would not vitiate the election of respondent No. 2, when he was in fact qualified on the date of filing of his candidature.
8. For the aforesaid reasons we do not find any substance in the above petition and the same is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. M. A. K. Petition dismissed.